Transportation network risk profile for an origin-destination pair security measures, terrorism, and target and attack method substitution

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2041, 2008, Pages 19-28

  Murray Tuite, Pamela M ^a  

^a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NETWORK SECURITY; RISK PERCEPTION; TERRORISM; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

ATTACK METHODS; MALICIOUS ENTITY; NETWORK RISKS; ORIGIN-DESTINATION PAIRS; RISK PROFILE; SECURITY MEASURE; SECURITY TARGET; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; TRANSPORTATION SECURITY; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 50849141096     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2041-03     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Howitt, A. M., and J. Makler. On the Ground: Protecting America's Roads and Transit Against Terrorism. The Brookings Institution Series on Transportation Reform 2005. www.brookings.edu/reports/2005/04 transportation_howitt.aspx. Accessed July 20. 2006.
2. Murray-Tuite, P. M. A Framework for Evaluating Risk to the Transportation Network from Terrorism and Security Policies. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Vol. 3, No. 3/4, 2007, pp. 389-407.
3. Balog, J. N., A. Boyd, J. Caton. P. N. Bromley, J. B. Strongin, D. Chia, and K. Bagdonas. TCRP Report 86: Public Transportation Emergency Mobilization and Emergency Operations Guide, Vol. 7. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
4. Eastern Roads. In Williamsburg Bridge: Historic Overview. www.nycroads.com/crossings/williamsburg/. Accessed Jan. 26, 2006.
5. National Research Council. Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism. The National Academies Press. Washington, D.C., 2002.
6. Sandler, T. Global Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. New York. 2004.
7. Haimes, Y. Y. Risk of Extreme Events and the Fallacy of Expected Value. In Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management, John Wiley and Sons. Inc., Hoboken, N.J., 2004, pp. 299-345.
8. Rowe, W. D. Alternative Risk Evaluation Paradigms. In Third Conference Sponsored kv the Engineering Foundation, Santa Barbara, Calif. ASCE, New York, 1987.
9. Iida, Y. Basic Concepts and Future Directions of Road Network Reliability Analysis. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1999, pp. 125-134.
10. Chen, A., et al. Capacity Reliability of a Road Network: An Assessment Methodology and Numerical Results. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2002. pp. 225-252.
11. Iida, Y., and H. Wakabayashi, An Approximation Method of Terminal Reliability of Road Network Using Partial Minimal Path and Cut Sets. In Transport Policy, Management & Technology Towards 2001: Fifth World Conference on Transport Research, Yokohama-shi, Japan, 1989.
12. Moteff, J. Risk Management and Critical Infrastructure Protection: Assessing, Integrating, and Managing Threats, Vulnerabilities and Consequences. Library of Congress. Washington. D.C., 2004.
13. Haimes, Y. Y. On the Definition of Vulnerabilities in Measuring Risks to Infrastructures. Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2006, pp. 293-296.
14. Bell, M. G. H. The Use of Game Theory to Measure the Vulnerability of Stochastic Networks. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2003, pp. 63-67.
15. D'Este, G. M., and M. A. P. Taylor. Network Vulnerability: An Approach to Reliability Analysis at the Level of National Strategic Transport Networks. In The Network Reliability of Transport: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (M. G. H. Bell and Y. Iida, eds.). Pergamon, New York, 2003, pp. 23-44.
16. Murray-Tuite, P. M. and H. S. Mahmassani. Methodology for Determining Vulnerable Links in a Transportation Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1882, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 88-96.
17. Nicholson, A. J., and E. Dalziell. Risk Evaluation and Management: A Road Network Reliability Study. In The Network Reliability of Transport: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (M. G. H. Bell and Y. Iida. eds.). Pergamon, New York, 2003, pp. 45-60.
18. Haimes, Y. Y., et al. A Risk Assessment Methodology for Critical Transportation Infrastructure. Virginia Transportation Research Council. Charlottesville. 2002.
19. Frohwein, H. I., and J. H. Lambert. Risk of Extreme Events in Multiobjective Decision Trees. Part I. Severe Events. Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2000, pp. 113-123.
20. Frohwein, H. I., Y. Y. Haimes, and J. H. Lambert. Risk of Extreme Events in Multiobjective Decision Trees. Part 2. Rare Events. Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2000, pp. 125-134.
21. Haimes, Y. Y. Statistics of Extremes: Extension of the PMRM. in Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J. 2004, pp. 439-500.
22. Murray-Tuite, P. Methodology for Determining Transportation Network Connectivity Reliability Under Threats of Terrorism. Proc., International SIIV Congress on People, Land, Environment, and Transport Infrastructures, Bari, Italy, 2005.
23. Haimes, Y. Y. Risk Modeling. Assessment, and Management of Terrorism. In Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management, John Wiley and Sons. Inc., Hoboken, N.J., 2004, pp. 684-716.
24. Little, R. G. Holistic Strategy for Urban Security. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2004, pp. 52-59.
25. Ahuja, R. K., T. L. Magnanti, and J. B. Orlin. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall. Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993.