Single versus multiple internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery bypass: 15-Year follow-up of a clinical practice trial

Circulation

Volumn 110, Issue 11 SUPPL., 2004, Pages

  Burfeind Jr , William R ^a   Glower, Donald D ^a   Wechsler, Andrew S ^b   Tuttle, Robert H ^c   Shaw, Linda K ^c   Harrell Jr , Frank E ^d   Rankin, J Scott ^d,e,f  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CENTENNIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilateral internal thoracic artery; Coronary artery bypass; Coronary artery disease; Multiple internal mammary artery grafting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PATENCY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RISK; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VEIN GRAFT;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CLINICAL TRIALS; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; INTERNAL MAMMARY-CORONARY ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; LIFE TABLES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NORTH CAROLINA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 4644292726     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138193.51635.6f     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM et al. Long-term (5-12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89:248-258.
2. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green GE, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts: effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:216-219.
3. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1-6.
4. Zeff RH, Kongtahworn C, Iannone LA, et al. Internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery: prospective randomized study with 10-years follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45:533-536.
5. Morris JJ, Smith LR, Glower DD, Muhlbaier LH, Reves IG, Wechsler AS, Rankin JS. Clinical evaluation of single versus multiple mammary artery bypass. Circulation. 1990;82(suppl IV):IV214-IV223.
6. Naunheim KS, Barner HB, Fiore AC. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts: 1992 update. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:716-718.
7. Buxton BF, Komeda M, Fuller JA, Gordon I. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery: risk adjusted survival. Circulation. 1998;98:II-1-II-6.
8. Carrel T, Horber P, Turina M, et al. Operation for two-vessel coronary artery disease: midterm results of bilateral ITA grafting versus unilateral ITA and saphenous vein grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1289-1294.
9. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic arteries are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:855-872.
10. Endo M, Nisheda H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2001;104:2164-2170.
11. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Astman DG. Effects of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001;358:870-875.
12. Dewar LR, Jamieson WR, Janusz MT, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl2):8-13.
13. Berreklouw E, Schonberger IR, Ercan H, et al. Does it make sense to use two internal thoracic arteries? Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1456-1463.
14. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:599-605.
15. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B. Validation and interdependence with patient-variables of the influence of procedural variables on early and late survival after CABG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;12:1-19.
16. Rankin JS, Morris JJ. Utilization of autologous arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass. Surgery of the Chest, 6th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia. 1993:1909-1925.
17. Rankin JS, Newman GE, Bashore TM, et al. Clinical and angiographic assessment of complex mammary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92:832-846.
18. Rankin JS, Smith LR, Muhlbaier LH, Califf RM, Jones RH, Wolfe WG, Oldham HN, VanTrigt P, Reves JG, Sabiston DC Jr: The importance of acute clinical presentation to survival prognosis after coronary artery bypass. Circulation 1988;78(suppl II):II-477.
19. Harrell FR Jr., Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361-387.
20. Mark DH, Rankin JS, Califf RM, Harrell FE Jr., Lee KL, Muhlbaier LH, Pryor DB, Peduzzi P. Surgical therapy for coronary disease: randomized and observational studies. JAMA. 1990;263:33-34.
21. Cox DR. Regression mdodels and life tables. J R Stat Soc. 1972;34:187-202.
22. Cook EF, Goldman L. Performance of tests of significance based on stratification by a multivariate confounding score or by a propensity score. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:312-324.
23. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling PL, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM. Ann Thorac Surg. in press.
24. Blackstone EH, Lytle BW. Competing risks after coronary bypass surgery: the influence of death on reintervention. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:1221-1230.