Modelling amperometric biosensors based on chemically modified electrodes

Sensors

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 4800-4820

  Baronas, Romas ^a   Kulys, Juozas ^b  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Biosensor; Chemically modified electrode; Modelling; Simulation

Indexed keywords

AMPEROMETRIC BIOSENSORS; CHEMICALLY MODIFIED ELECTRODE; ENZYME INTERACTION; FINITE-DIFFERENCE TECHNIQUES; GOVERNING PARAMETERS; REACTION DIFFUSION EQUATIONS; SIMULATION; STEADY-STATE CONDITION;

DIFFUSION; ENZYMES; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODELS;

BIOSENSORS;

EID: 50849102356     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s8084800     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Turner, A. P. E; Karube, I.; Wilson, G. S. Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
2. Scheller, F.; Schubert, F. Biosensors. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992.
3. Chaubey, A.; Malhotra, B. D. Mediated biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2002, 17(6), 441-456.
4. Wollenberger, U.; Lisdat, F.; Scheller, F. W. Frontiers in Biosensorics 2. Practical Applications. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1997.
5. Knopf, G. K.; Bassi, A. S. Smart Biosensor Technology. CRC Press, New York, 2007.
6. Cenas, N. K.; Kulys, J. J. Biocatalytic oxidation of glucose on the conductive charge transfer complexes. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1981, 8, 103-113.
7. Sapelnikova, S.; Dock, E.; Solna, R.; Skladal, P.; Ruzgas, T.; Emnéus, J. Screen-printed multienzyme arrays for use in amperometric batch and flow systems. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376(7), 1098-1103.
8. Hart, J. P.; Crew, A.; Crouch, E.; Honeychurch, K. C.; Pemberton, R. M. Some recent designs and developments of screen-printed carbon electrochemical sensors/biosensors for biomedical, environmental, and industrial analyses. Anal. Lett. 2004, 37(5), 789-830.
9. Forrow, N. J.; Bayliff, S. W. A commercial whole blood glucose biosensor with a low sensitivity to hematocrit based on an impregnated porous carbon electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21(4), 3581-587.
10. Renedo, O. D.; Alonso-Lomillo, M. A.; Martinez, M. J. A. Recent developments in the field of screen-printed electrodes and their related applications. Talanta 2007, 73(2), 202-219.
11. Tudorache, M.; Bala, C. Biosensors based on screen-printing technology, and their applications in environmental and food analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 388(3), 565-578.
12. Murray, R. W. Chemically modified electrodes. Accts. Chem. Res. 1980, 13(5), 135-141.
13. Mizutani, F. Application of enzyme-modified electrodes to biosensors. Bunseki Kagaku 1999, 48, 809-821.
14. Svancara, I.; Vytras, K.; Barek, J.; Zima, J. Carbon paste electrodes in modern electroanalysis. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2001, 31(4), 311-345.
15. Mello, L. D.; Kubota, L. T. Review of the use of biosensors as analytical tools in the food and drink industries. Food Chem. 2002, 77(2), 237-256.
16. Ferreira, L. S.; Souza, M. B. D.; Trierweiler, J. O.; Broxtermann, O.; Folly, R. O. M.; Hitzmann, B. Aspects concerning the use of biosensors for process control: experimental and simulation investigations. Comp. Chem. Engng. 2003, 27(8), 1165-1173.
17. Corcuera, J. R. D.; Cavalieri, R.; Powers, J.; Tang, J. Amperometric enzyme biosensor optimization using mathematical modeling. In Proceedings of the 2004 ASAE / Csae Annual International Meeting, page Paper No. 047030, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, (August 1-4 2004). American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
18. Amatore, C.; Oleinick, A. I.; Svir, I. Construction of optimal quasi-conformal mappings for the 2d-numerical simulation of diffusion at microelectrodes. part 1: Principle of the method and its application to the inlaid disk microelectrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2006, 597(1), 69-76.
19. Stamatin, I.; Berlic, C.; Vaseashta, A. On the computer-aided modelling of analyte-receptor interactions for an efficient sensor design. Thin Solid Films 2006, 495, 312-315.
20. Mell, C. D.; Maloy, J. T. A model for the amperometric enzyme electrode obtained through digital simulation and applied to the glucose oxidase system. Anal. Chem. 1975, 47, 299-307.
21. Kernevez, J. P. Enzyme Mathematics. Studies in Mathematics and its Applications. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1980.
22. Kulys, J. The development of new analytical systems based on biocatalysts. Anal. Lett. 1981, 14, 377-397.
23. Bartlett, P. N.; Pratt, K. F. E. Modelling of processes in enzyme electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1993, 8(9-10), 451-462.
24. Lyons, M. E. G.; Greer, J. C.; Fitzgerald, C. A.; Bannon, T.; Barlett, P. N. Theoretical analysis of time dependent diffusion, reaction and electromigration in membranes. Analyst 1996, 121, 715-731.
25. Pérusse, P.; Leech, D. Dual electrode cyclic voltammetry under computer control using graphical programming of a bipotentiostat. Instrum. Sci. Technol. 2000, 28(1), 59-70.
26. Schulmeister, T. Mathematical modelling of the dynamic behaviour of amperometric enzyme electrodes. Select. Electr. Rev. 1990, 12, 203-260.
27. Lyons, M. E. G. Mediated electron transfer at redox active monolayers. Sensors 2001, 1(7), 215-228.
28. Yokoyama, K.; Koide, S.; Kayanuma, Y. Cyclic voltammetric simulation of electrochemically mediated enzyme reaction and elucidation of blosensor behaviors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 372(2), 248-253.
29. Kulys, J.; Tetianec, L. Synergistic substrates determination with biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21(1), 152-158.
30. Chen, L. C.; Tseng, K. S.; Ho, K. C. General kinetic model for amperometric sensors based on prussian blue mediator and its analogs: Application to cysteine detection. Electroanalysis 2006, 18(13-14), 1313-1321.
31. Naujikas, R.; Malinauskas, A.; Ivanauskas, F. Modeling of electrocatalytic processes at conducting polymer modified electrodes. J. Math. Chem. 2007, 42(4), 1069-1084.
32. Aris, R. The Mathematical Theory of Diffusion and Reaction in Permeable Catalysts. The Theory of the Steady State. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.
33. Britz, D. Digital Simulation in Electrochemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 3rd edition, 2005.
34. Kulys, J.; Samalius, A. S.; Svirmickas, G.-J. S. Electron exchange between the enzyme active center and organic metal. FEBS Lett. 1980, 114, 7-10.
35. Samarskii, A. A. The Theory of Difference Schemes. Marcel Dekker, New York-Basel, 2001.
36. Baronas, R.; Kulys, J.; Ivanauskas, F. Computational modelling of biosensors with perforated and selective membranes. J. Math. Chem. 2006, 39(2), 345-362.
37. Gaidamauskaite, E.; Baronas, R. A comparison of finite difference schemes for computational modelling of biosensors. Nonlinear Anal. Model. Contr. 2007, 12(3), 359-369.
38. Moreira, J. E.; Midkiff, S. P.; Gupta, M.; Artigas, P. V.; Snir, M.; Lawrence, R. D. Java programming for high-performance numerical computing. IBM Syst. J. 2000, 39(6), 21-56.
39. Baronas, R.; Ivanauskas, F.; Kulys, J. The influence of enzyme membrane thickness on the response of amperometric biosensors. Sensors 2003, 3(7), 248-262.
40. Baronas, R.; Ivanauskas, F.; Kulys, J. The effect of diffusion limitations on the response of amperometric biosensors with substrate cyclic conversion. J. Math. Chem. 2004, 35(3), 199-213.
41. Baronas, R.; Gaidamauskaite, E.; Kulys, J. Modelling a peroxidase-based optical biosensor. Sensors 2007, 7(11), 2723-2740.
42. Ivanauskas, F.; Baronas, R. Modelling an amperometric biosensor acting in a flowing liquid. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2008, 56(8), 1313-1319.