Towards a planning support system for environmental management and agri-environmental measures-The Colorfields study

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 234-244

  Paar, Philip ^a   Röhricht, Wieland ^b   Schuler, Johannes ^b  

^a ZUSE INSTITUTE BERLIN   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecological aesthetics; Economic ecological impact assessment; Landscape visualization; Multifunctionality; Planning support system

Indexed keywords

CULTIVATION; DATA VISUALIZATION; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FARMS; PLANTS (BOTANY); VISUALIZATION;

'CURRENT; ECOLOGICAL ESTHETIC; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ECONOMIC-ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES; LANDSCAPE VISUALIZATION; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; PLANNING SUPPORT SYSTEMS; REAL-WORLD; SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ESTHETICS; EUROPEAN UNION; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PLANNING SYSTEM; STAKEHOLDER; VISUALIZATION;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BEE; BIENNIAL PLANT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EUROPEAN UNION; FALLOW; FLOWER; GERMANY; HABITAT; INSECT; INTERCROPPING; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; PROFIT; SOIL FERTILITY; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; TILLAGE;

APOIDEA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 50849102301     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.047     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Antrop M. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005) 21-34
2. Appleton K., Lovett A., Sünnenberg G., and Trudie Dockerty T. Rural landscape visualisation from GIS databases: a comparison of approaches, options and problems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26 (2002) 141-162
3. Berger G., Kächele H., and Pfeffer H. The greening of the European common agricultural policy by linking the European-wide obligation of set-aside with voluntary agri-environmental measures on a regional scale. Environmental Science and Policy 9 (2006) 509-524
4. Bienefeld K., and Künemund H. Warum wird man Imker? Auswertung einer Umfrage zur Nachwuchsbewerbung in der Imkerschaft. Teil. 1. Deutsches Bienen Journal 10 (2001) 20-22
5. Bishop I.D., and Leahy P.N.A. Assessing the visual impact of development proposals: the validity of computer simulations. Landscape Journal 8 (1989) 92-100
6. Boeckmann, T., Paar, P., Schuhmann, F., Schindler, B., 2003. Die Farbfelder-Augen-Sinnes-Bienen-Weiden auf Ackerbrachen. Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umweltschutz und Raumordnung des Landes Brandenburg (Ed.), Potsdam.
7. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde (1964), Springer, Vienna (first ed. 1928)
8. Council of Europe, 2000. The European Landscape Convention. 〈http://www.coe.int/t/e/Cultural_Co-operation/Environment/Landscape〉 (accessed: 30.10.06).
9. Daniel T.C. Data visualization for decision support in environmental management. Landscape and Urban Planning 21 (1992) 261-263
10. Deussen O. A framework for geometry generation and rendering of plants with applications in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (2003) 105-113
11. Frieben B. Das Ackerrrandstreifenprogramm in Nordrhein-Westfalen-Effizienz und Perspektiven (1992), Stiftung zum Schutz gefährdeter Pflanzen, Bonn pp. 36-43
12. Geertman S., and Stillwell J. Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28 (2004) 291-310
13. Haaren von, C., Oppermann, B., Friese, K.-I., Hachmann, R., Meiforth, J., Neumann, A., Tiedtke, S., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., Wolter, F.-E., 2005. Interaktiver Landschaftsplan Königslutter am Elm-Ergebnisse aus dem E+E-Vorhaben, Interaktiver Landschaftsplan Königslutter am Elm" des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 24, LV Druck im Landwirtschaftsverlag, Bonn.
14. Hedtke, C., 1996. Die Attraktivität von 5 Nutzpflanzen für die Honigbiene im Vergleich. Honeybee and beekeeping in densely populated Middle Europe. Abstracts III. ger.-pol. Symposium, Allenstein, 42.
15. Hedtke C. Ein Bienenweidegemisch zur Begrünung stillgelegter Flächen. Die neue Bienenzucht 24 (1997) 106-107
16. Hedtke C. Bienenweidemischungen nützen Landwirt und Imker. Deutsches Bienen Journal 8 26 (2000) 158
17. Hedtke C., and Pritsch G. Qualitative und quantitative Untersuchungen zum Beflug des Buchweizen (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Apidologie 24 (1993) 476-477
18. Kächele, H., 1999. Auswirkungen großflächiger Naturschutzprojekte auf die Landwirtschaft. Ökonomische Bewertung der einzelbetrieblichen Konsequenzen am Beispiel des Nationalparks "Unteres Odertal". Agrarwirtschaft [Sonderheft 163].
19. Klosterman R. Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer-aided planning. Journal of Planning Education Research 17 (1997) 45-54
20. Klosterman R. The what if? Planning support system. In: Brail R.K., and Klosterman R.E. (Eds). Planning Support Systems: Integrated Geographic Information Systems and Visualization Tools (2001), ESRI Press, Redlands, CA 262-284
21. Kratochwil A. Pflanzengesellschaften und Blütenbesuchergemeinschaften: biozönologische Untersuchungen in einem nicht mehr bewirtschafteten Halbtrockenrasen (Mesobrometum) im Kaiserstuhl (Südwestdeutschland). Phytocoenologia 11 (1984) 455-669
22. Kwartler M., and Bernard R.N. CommunityViz: an integrated planning support system. In: Brail R.K., and Klosterman R.E. (Eds). Planning Support Systems: Integrated Geographic Information Systems and Visualization Tools (2001), ESRI Press, Redlands, CA 285-308
23. Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz, 2005. Datensammlung für die Betriebsplanung und die betriebswirtschaftliche Bewertung landwirtschaftlicher Produktionsverfahren im Land Brandenburg, Frankfurt/Oder.
24. Lange E. The limits of realism: perceptions of virtual landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 54 (2001) 163-182
25. Leopold A. The farmer as conservationist. American Forests 45 (1939) 296-297
26. MacFarlane R. Building blocks or stumbling blocks? Landscape ecology and farm-level participation in agri-environmental policy. Landscape Research 25 (2000) 321-331
27. Mentink H.R. Long term developments in European agriculture and its visual impact on the landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 18 (1990) 203-209
28. Meyer-Aurich A., Zander P., Werner A., and Roth R. Developing agricultural land use strategies appropriate to nature conservation goals and environmental protection. Landscape and Urban Planning 41 (1998) 119-127
29. Meyer-Aurich, A., Schuler, J., Auerswald, K., Zander, P., Kächele, H., 2001. Trade off of soil protection-assessing economic consequences of erosion control. In: Helming, K. (Ed.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Soil Conservation Strategies. Proceedings of the International Symposium ESSC, DBG. ZALF Müncheberg, Zentrum für Agrarlandschafts-und Landnutzungsforschung, pp. 161-166.
30. Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten Niedersachsen (ML), 2004. Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen für Niedersächsische Agrar-Umweltprogramme (NAU) 2004, RdErl. d. ML v. 21.7.2004 (Nds.MBl. No.34/200, 655).
31. Müller P. Artenschutz durch "dauerhafte Zwischenstrukturen". Agrarspectrum 24 (1995) 85-107
32. Müller, K., Toussaint, V., Bork, H.-R., Hagedorn, K., Kern, J., Nagel, U.J., Peters, J., Schmidt, R., Weith, T., Werner, A., Dosch, A., Piorr, A. (Eds.), 2002. Nachhaltigkeit und Landschaftsnutzung: Neue Wege kooperativen Handelns. Margraf Weikersheim.
33. Nassauer J.I. Landscape care: perceptions of local people in landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape and Land Use Planning 8 (1988) 27-41
34. Nassauer J.I. The aesthetics of horticulture: neatness as a form of care. HortScience 23 (1988) 973-977
35. Nassauer J.I. Aesthetic objectives for agricultural policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44 (1989) 384-387
36. Nassauer J.I. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14 2 (1995) 161-170
37. Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Statistik (NLS). Bodennutzung und Ernte 2004 (2005), Statistische Berichte Niedersachsen, Hannover
38. Paar P. Lenné3D-the making of a new landscape visualization system: from requirements analysis and feasibility survey towards prototyping. In: Buhmann E., and Ervin S. (Eds). Trends in Landscape Modeling. Proceedings at Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, 2003 (2003), Wichmann, Heidelberg 78-84
39. Paar P. Landscape visualizations: applications and requirements of 3D visualization software for environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 30 6 (2006) 815-839
40. Paar P., and Boeckmann T. Farbfelder statt Ackerbrachen. Brandenburger Agrar und Umwelt Journal 9 (2001) 20-21
41. Paar P., and Rekittke J. Lenné3D-walk-through visualization of planned landscapes. In: Bishop I.D., and Lange E. (Eds). Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning (2005), Spon Press, UK 152-162
42. Palang H., Prinsmann A., Gyuró E.K., Urbanc M., Skowronek E., and Woloszyn W. The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecology 20 (2005) 645-655
43. Perkins N.H. Three questions on the use of photo-realistic simulations as real world surrogates. Landscape and Urban Planning 21 (1991) 265-267
44. Radtke, J., 2004. Farbfelder-Blühende Landschaften gestalten. ADIZ, 38, 20-21; die biene 140, 20-21; Imkerfreund 59, 20-21.
45. Rekittke R., and Paar P. Digital botany. Thinking eye. Journal of Landscape Architecture 2 (2006) 28-35 (cover rendition)
46. Repton, H., 1803. Observations on the theory and practice of landscape gardening: including some remarks on Grecian and Gothic architecture. Taylor, London; Phaidon, Oxfort (facs.).
47. Richert, A., 1999 ff. Die Großschmetterlinge (Macrolepidoptera) der Diluviallandschaften um Eberswalde. Deutsches Entomol. Inst., Eberswalde, vols. 1-4.
48. Röhricht, W., 2005. oik-nulla vita sine dispensatio. Vegetation modelling for landscape planning. In: Buhmann, E., Paar, P., Bishop, I.D., Lange, E. (Eds.), Trends in Real-Time Landscape Visualization and Participation. Proceedings of Anhalt University of Applied Sciences 2005, Wichmann, pp. 254-262.
49. Ruppert, V., 1993. Einfluß blütenreicher Feldrandstrukturen auf die Dichte blütenbesuchender Insekten insbesondere der Syrphinae (Diptera: Syrphidae), Agrarökologie 8, Paul Haupt Verlag, Bern, Stuttgart, Vienna.
50. Sattler C., Schuler J., and Zander P. Determination of trade-off-functions to analyse the provision of agricultural non-commodities. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 5 (2006) 309-325
51. Saure, C., 2002a. Insekten am konventionellen und transgenen Raps: Blütenbesuch, Pollentransfer und Auskreuzung. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Biology, Free University, Berlin.
52. Saure, C., 2002b. Naturschutzfachliche Bedeutung von Ackerstilllegungen für Wildbienen (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apidae). Beitrag zum E+E-Vorhaben "Schlaginterne Segregation". Expertise by order of ZALF, Müncheberg.
53. Schaffner D., and Keller S. Praxiserfahrungen mit Buntbrachen und Ackerrandstreifen in der Schweiz. Schriftenreihe der Landesanstalt für Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenschutz 6 (1998) 45-54
54. Schuhmacher W. Gefährdete Ackerkräuter können auf ungespritzten Feldrändern erhalten werden. LÖLF-Mitteilungen 9 (1984) 14-20
55. Schuler, J., Kächele, H., 2001. Best practice and best policy-an economic reflection of the implementation of the German soil protection act. In: Helming, K. (Ed.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Soil Conservation Strategies. Proceedings of the International Symposium ESSC, DBG. ZALF Müncheberg, Zentrum für Agrarlandschafts-und Landnutzungsforschung, pp. 167-172.
56. Schuler J., and Kächele H. Modelling on-farm costs of soil conservation policies with MODAM. Environmental Science and Policy 6 (2003) 51-55
57. Schwertmann U., Vogl W., and Kainz M. Bodenerosion durch Wasser-Vorhersage des Abtrags und Bewertung von Gegenmaßnahmen (1987), Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart
58. Sheppard, S.R.J., 1982. Landscape portrayals: their use, accuracy, and validity in simulating proposed landscape change. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
59. Ssymank, A., 2001. Vegetation und blütenbesuchende Insekten in der Kulturlandschaft. Schr.r. Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz, 64, Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster.
60. Stock C., and Bishop I.D. Helping rural communities envision their future. In: Bishop I.D., and Lange E. (Eds). Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning (2005), Spon Press, London 145-151
61. Strelow, H. (Ed.), 2004. Ecological Aesthetics. Art in Environmental Design: Theory and Practice. Birkhäuser, Basel, Berlin, Boston.
62. Tress B., and Tress G. Scenario visualization for participatory landscape planning-a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (2003) 161-178
63. Warren-Kretzschmer, B., Tiedke, S., 2005. What role does visualization play in communication with citizens?-a field study from the interactive landscape plan. In: Buhmann, E., Paar, P., Bishop, I.D., Lange, E. (Eds.), Trends in Real-Time Landscape Visualization and Participation. Proceedings of Anhalt University of Applied Sciences 2005, Wichmann, pp. 156-167.
64. Werner, A., Deussen, O., Döllner, J., Hege, H.-C., Paar, P., Rekittke, J., 2005. Lenné3D-walking through landscape plans. In: Buhmann, E., Paar, P., Bishop, I.D., Lange, E. (Eds.), Trends in Real-Time Landscape Visualization and Participation. Proceedings of Anhalt University of Applied Sciences 2005, Wichmann, pp. 48-59.
65. Wetzel, T. (under collaboration of Volkmar, C., Lübke-Al Hussein, M., Stark, A., Richter, L., Schmutzler, K., Frangenberg, A.), 2004. Integrierter Pflanzenschutz und Agrarökosysteme. Steinbeis-Transferzentrum (STZ) Integrierter Pflanzenschutz und Ökosysteme, Pausa/Vogtl.
66. Wiggering, H., Müller, K., Werner, A., Helming, K., 2003. The concept of multifunctionality in sustainable land development. In: Helming, K., Wiggering, H. (Eds.), Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes, Berlin, pp. 3-18.
67. Zander, P., 2003. Agricultural land use and conservation options-a modelling approach. Wageningen.
68. Zander P., and Kächele H. Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development. Agricultural Systems 59 (1999) 311-325