Selection of appropriate schedule delay analysis method: Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)

Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 483-488

  Adhikari, Ishwar ^a   Kim, Soo Yong ^a   Lee, Young Dai ^a  

^a Pukyong National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER NETWORKS; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; COST ACCOUNTING; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT LIABILITY; TUNNELING (EXCAVATION);

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; SCHEDULE-DELAY ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENTS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 50849093556     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2006.296646     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Abdalla M. Odeh, Hussein T. Battaineh. "Causes of Construction delay: traditional contracts", International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 20, pp. 67-73, 2002.
2. Alkass., S.,Mazerolle, M.,Tribaldos., and Harris, F. "Computer aided construction delay analysis and claim preparation," Journal of Construction Management and Economics, Vol.13, pp.335-352, 1995.
3. Arditi David and Thanat Pattanakitchamroon. "Selecting a delay analysis method in resolving construction claims". International Journal Of Project Management, Article in Press, September 2005.
4. Dey, P. K, "Analytic Hierarchy Process Analyzes Risk of Operating Cross-Country Petroleum Pipelines in India," ASCE, Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 4, pp. 213-221, 2003
5. Dyer R.F., and E.H Forman., "Group decision support with analytic hierarchy process," Decision support system, Vol. 8 pp. 99-124,1992.
6. Fruchtman E., "Delay analysis-eliminating the smoke and mirrors," Trans AACE Int, CDR. 6.1-CDR.6.4, 2000.
7. Jentzen GH, P Spittler., Ponce de Leon G. "Responsibility for delay after the expiration of the contract time". Trans AACE Int, DCL.9.1.-DCL.9.7, 1994.
8. McCulloough R. B. "CPM schedules in construction claims from the Contractor's prespective". Trans AACE Int,CDR.2.1.-CDR.2.4, (1999).
9. Richard J.Long, P.E., Andrew Avalon, P.E., Ronald J. Rider, MBA and Anamaria Popescu, Ph.D. 2005. "Long International's Schedule and Delay Analysis Methodologies, "Retrived 1/18/06 www.long-intl.com/schedule.pdf
10. Rubin RA, Guy SD, Maevis AC, Fairweather V. "Delay analysis construction claims analysis, presentation, and defense. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1983.
11. Saaty, T.L, "The analytical hierarchy process," McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
12. Saaty, T.L, "Decision making for leaders. Lifetime Learning," New York, 1982.
13. Saaty, T.L, "Priority setting in complex problems". IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., Vol. 30, pp. 140-155, August 1983.
14. Sabah Alkass, Mark Mazerolle and Frank Harris.,"Construction delay analysis Techniques," Journal of Construction management and Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 375-394, 1996.
15. Saied Kartam., "Generic Methodology for Analyzing Delay Claims", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol 125, pp. 409-419, 1999.
16. SCL-Society of Construction Law. "Delay and Disruption protocol;" 2002. Available from: www.eotprotocol.com
17. Vargas, L.G.., "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications,". European Journal of Operation and Res, Vol. 48, pp. 2-8. 1990.
18. Wickwire J. T Driscoll, S Hurlbut., "Construction scheduling preparation liability, and claims," New York(NY), Wiley Law Publications. 1991.
19. Zack Jr J., "But-for schedule-analysis and defense," Cost Engineering AACE, Vol 43), pp. 13-17, 2001.