Efficacy of evaluation of rooster sperm morphology using different staining methods

Research in Veterinary Science

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 583-588

  Lukaszewicz E ^a   Jerysz, A ^a   Partyka, A ^a   Siudzinska A ^a  

^a WROC AW UNIVERSITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Eosin nigrosin stains; Fowl semen; Sperm morphology

Indexed keywords

EOSIN;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; BREEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERTILITY; FOWL; HERD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCTION; ROOSTER; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; STAINING;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; COLORING AGENTS; MALE; SEMEN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 50849085157     PISSN: 00345288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ansah G.A., Segura J.C., and Buckland R.B. Semen production, sperm quality, and their heritabilities as influenced by selection for fertility of frozen-thawed semen in the chicken. Poultry Science 64 (1985) 1801-1803
2. Bakst M.R. Fertilizing capacity and morphology of fowl and turkey spermatozoa in hypotonic extender. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 60 (1980) 121-127
3. Blom E. A one minute live-dead sperm stain by means of eosin-nigrosin. Journal of Fertility and Sterility 1 (1950) 176-177
4. Blom E. Physiology and pathology of reproduction. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 4 (1981) 239-242 (in Polish)
5. Bahr J.M., and Bakst M.R. Poultry. In: Hafez E.S.E. (Ed). Reproduction in Farm Animals (1987), Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 379-497 Chapter 18
6. Bakst, M.R., Cecil, H.C., 1997. Techniques for semen evaluation, semen storage, and fertility determination. 3. Sperm viability. I. Nigrosin/eosin stain for determining live/dead and abnormal sperm counts. The Poultry Science Association, Inc., Savoy, Illinois, pp. 29-34.
7. Burrows W.H., and Quinn J.P. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poultry Science XVI 1 (1937) 19-24
8. Bilgili S.F., Renden J.A., and Sexton K.J. The influence of staining techniques and examiners on evaluation of the morphology of fowl spermatozoa. Poultry Science 64 (1985) 2358-2361
9. Bjorndahl L., Soderlund I., and Kvist U. Evaluation of the one-step eosin-nigrosin staining technique for human sperm vitality assessment. Human reproduction 18 (2003) 813-816
10. Blesbois E., Grasseau I., and Seigneurin F. Membrane fluidity and the ability of domestic bird spermatozoa to survive cryopreservation. Reproduction 129 (2005) 371-378
11. Chełmońska B. Seasonal changes in function of gander reproductive track in aspect of artificial insemination. Part I i II. Polskie Archiwum Weterynaryjne 15 (1972) 575-611 (in Polish)
12. Chalah T., and Brillard J.P. Comparison of assessment of fowl sperm viability by eosin-nigrosin and dual fluorescence (Sybr-14/PI). Theriogenology 50 (1998) 487-493
13. Cooper D.M., and Rowell J.G. Relations between fertility, embryotic survival and some semen characteristics in chicken. Poultry Science 37 (1958) 699-707
14. Donoghue A.M. Prospective approaches to avoid flock fertility problems: predictive assessment of sperm function traits in poultry. Poultry Science 78 (1999) 437-443
15. Donoghue A.M., and Wishart G.J. Storage of poultry semen. Animal Reproduction Science 62 (2000) 213-232
16. Donoghue A.M., Garner D.I., Donoghue D.J., and Johnson L.A. Assessment of the membrane integrity of fresh and stored turkey spermatozoa using a combination of hypo-osmotic stress, fluorescent staining and fowl cytometry. Theriogenology 46 (1996) 153-163
17. Edens F.W., Van Krey H.P., and Siegel P.B. Selection for body weight at eight weeks of age 10. Spermatozoal morphology. Poultry Science 52 (1973) 2287-2289
18. Froman D.P., and Feltmann A.J. Sperm mobility: a quantitative trait of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biology of Reproduction 58 (1998) 376-384
19. Głód W. Reproduction and bovine insemination, Chapter V. Semen evaluation (1976), PWRiL, Warszawa pp. 115-138, (in Polish)
20. Howarth Jr. B. Fertilizing ability of cock spermatozoa from the testis, epididimis, and vas deferens following intramagnal insemination. Biology of Reproduction 28 (1983) 586-590
21. Hazary R.C., and Wishart G.J. Assay of sperm quality in the domestic fowl by MTT reduction. British Poultry Science 42 (2001) 111-114
22. Holsberger D.R., Donoghue A.M., Froman D.P., and Ottinger M.A. Assessment of ejaculate quality and sperm characteristics in turkeys: sperm mobility phenotype is independent of time. Poultry Science 77 (1998) 1711-1717
23. King L.M., Kirby J.D., Froman D.P., Sonstegard T.S., Harry D.E., Darden J.R., Marini P.J., Walker R.M., Rhoads M.L., and Donoghue A.M. Efficacy of sperm mobility assessment in commercial flocks and the relationship of sperm mobility and insemination dose with fertility in turkeys. Poultry Science 79 (2000) 1797-1802
24. Kuster C.E., Singer R.S., and Althouse G.C. Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm. Theriogenology 61 (2004) 691-703
25. Lake, P.E., 1978. The principles and practice of semen collection and preservation in birds. In: Symposium of Zoological Society, London, p. 43
26. Łukaszewicz E. Study of diluents for cock's semen storage in the light of laboratory estimation and fertility rates. Zeszyty Naukowe AR we Wrocławiu, Zootechnika XXX 168 (1988) 43-59 (in Polish)
27. Łukaszewicz E. Cryopreservation of Anser anser L. gander semen. Zeszyty Naukowe AR we Wrocławiu 440, Rozprawy CXC (2002) 1-11 (in Polish)
28. Łukaszewicz E., and Kruszyński W. Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed gander semen of individual ganders by assessment of spermatozoa motility and morphology. Theriogenology 59 (2003) 1627-1640
29. McDaniel G.R. Managing broiler breeders for maximum fertility. World Poultry 9 (1995) 25-27
30. McIntyre D.R. Selling sires by the dose. In: Bakst M.R., and Wishart G.J. (Eds). Proceedings of First International Symposium on the Artificial Insemination of Poultry (1995), Poultry Science Association, Savoy, Illinois 123-127
31. Mellor S. Selecting males by sperm quality. World Poultry 3 (2001) 32-34
32. Morisson M., Bordas A., Petit J.M., Jayat-Vignoles C., Julien R., and Minevielle F. Associated effects of divergent selection for residual feed consumption on reproduction, sperm characteristics, and mitochondria of spermatozoa. Poultry Science 76 (1997) 425-431
33. Parker J.E., McKenzie F.F., and Kempster H.L. Fertility in the male domestic fowl. Research Bulletin 347 (1942) 1-50
34. Root-Kustritz M.V., Olson P.N., Johnston S.D., and Root T.K. The effects of stains and investigators on assessment of morphology of canine spermatozoa. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 34 (1998) 348-352
35. Sexton T.J. A new poultry semen extender. 1. Effect of extension on the fertility of chicken semen. Poultry Science 56 (1977) 1443-1446