Two minimal problems for cameras with radial distortion

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Kukelova, Zuzana ^a   Pajdla, Tomas ^a  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE PROCESSING;

RADIAL DISTORTIONS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 50649110976     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4409190     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. J. Barreto and K. Daniilidis Fundamental Matrix for Cameras with Radial Distortion. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Beijing, October 2005
2. D. Cox, J. Little, and D. O'Shea. Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, 1992.
3. D. Cox, J. Little, and D. O'Shea. Using Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
4. M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles. Random Sample Consensus: A paradigm formodel fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Comm. ACM, 24(6):381-395, 1981.
5. A. Fitzgibbon. Simultaneous linear estimation of multiple view geometry and lens distortion. CVPR 2001, pp. 125-132.
6. 4). Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 139(1-3):61-88, 1999.
7. X.-S. Gao, X.-R. Hou, J. Tang, and H.-F. Cheng. Complete solution classification for the perspective-three-point problem. IEEE PAMI, 25(8):930-943, 2003.
8. C. Geyer and H. Stewenius. A nine-point algorithm for estimating para-catadioptric fundamental matrices. CVPR 2007.
9. R. Hartley and S. Kang. Parameter-free radial distortion correction with centre of distortion estimation. ICCV 2005, pp. 1834-1841.
10. R. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
11. S. Kang. Catadioptric self-calibration. CVPR 2000, pp. I:201-208.
12. Z. Kukelova and T. Pajdla. A minimal solution to the autocalibration of radial distortion. CVPR 2007
13. H. Li. A simple solution to the six-point two-view focal-length problem. ECCV 2006, pp. 200-213.
14. H. Li and R. Hartley. A non-iterative method for correcting lens distortion from nine-point correspondences. OMNIVIS 2005.
15. H. Li and R. Hartley. Five-point motion estimation made easy. ICPR 2006, pp. 630-633.
16. J. Matas, O. Chum, M. Urban, and T. Pajdla. Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image and Vision Computing, 22(10):761-767, 2004.
17. B. Micusik and T. Pajdla. Estimation of omnidirectional camera model from epipolar geometry. CVPR 2003, pp. 485-490.
18. B. Micusik and T. Pajdla. Structure from motion with wide circular field of view cameras. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 28(7):1135-1149, July 2006.
19. D. Nister. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose. IEEE PAMI, 26(6):756-770, 2004.
20. R. Steele and C. Jaynes. Overconstrained linear estimation of radial distortion and multi-view geometry. ECCV 2006, pp. 253-264.
21. G. Stein. Lens distortion calibration using point correspondences. CVPR 1997, pp. 600:602.
22. H. Stewenius, C. Engels, and D. Nister. Recent developments on direct relative orientation. ISPRS J. of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60:284-294, 2006.
23. H. Stewenius, D. Nister, F. Kahl, and F. Schaffalitzky. Aminimal solution for relative pose with unknown focal length. In CVPR 2005, pp. 789-794.
24. H. Stewenius, D. Nister, M. Oskarsson, and K. Astrom. Solutions to minimal generalized relative pose problems. OMNIVIS 2005.
25. S. Thirthala and M. Pollefeys. The radial trifocal tensor: A tool for calibrating the radial distortion of wide-angle cameras. CVPR 2005 pp. 321-328.
26. C. Traverso. Gröbner trace algorithms. In ISSAC, pages 125-138, 1988.
27. Z. Zhang. On the epipolar geometry between two images with lens distortion. In ICPR 1996.