Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Female Pelvis

Seminars in Roentgenology

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 290-302

  Sala, Evis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMYOSIS; ADNEXA DISEASE; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; ENDOMETRIOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FOLLOW UP; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HUMAN; LEIOMYOMA; LEIOMYOSARCOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY CARCINOMA; PATIENT POSITIONING; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; ROKITANSKY SYNDROME; TREATMENT PLANNING; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERUS MALFORMATION;

ARTIFACTS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEIOMYOMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PELVIC NEOPLASMS; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS; VAGINA;

EID: 50549083725     PISSN: 0037198X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2008.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Sala E., Wakely S., Senior E., et al. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 1577-1587
2. Shibutani O., Joja I., Shiraiwa M., et al. Endometrial carcinoma: efficacy of thin-section oblique axial MR images for evaluating cervical invasion. Abdom Imaging 24 (1999) 520-526
3. Takahashi S., Murakami T., Narumi Y., et al. Preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic effect of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 206 (1998) 539-547
4. Shiraiwa M., Joja I., Asakawa T., et al. Cervical carcinoma: efficacy of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted images for evaluating parametrial invasion. Abdom Imaging 24 (1999) 514-519
5. Hricak H., Hamm B., Semelka R.C., et al. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 181 (1991) 95-106
6. Manfredi R., Mirk P., Maresca G., et al. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 231 (2004) 372-378
7. Fujii S., Matsusue E., Kigawa J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results. Eur Radiol 18 (2008) 384-389
8. Shen S.H., Chiou Y.Y., Wang J.H., et al. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 (2008) 481-488
9. Sarty G.E., Kendall E.J., Loewy J., et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion imaging of ovarian masses: a first experience with 12 cases. Magma 16 (2004) 182-193
10. Fujii S., Matsusue E., Kanasaki Y., et al. Detection of peritoneal dissemination in gynecological malignancy: evaluation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 18 (2008) 18-23
11. Rockall A.G., Sohaib S.A., Harisinghani M.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 2813-2821
12. Carrington B.M., Hricak H., Nuruddin R.N., et al. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 176 (1990) 715-720
13. Ascher S.M., Jha R.C., and Reinhold C. Benign myometrial conditions: leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14 (2003) 281-304
14. Tamai K., Togashi K., Ito T., et al. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 25 (2005) 21-40
15. Murase E., Siegelman E.S., Outwater E.K., et al. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features. MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 19 (1999) 1179-1197
16. Pattani S.J., Kier R., Deal R., et al. MRI of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Magn Reson Imaging 13 (1995) 331-333
17. Spies J.B., Roth A.R., Jha R.C., et al. Leiomyomata treated with uterine artery embolization: factors associated with successful symptom and imaging outcome. Radiology 222 (2002) 45-52
18. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58 (2008) 71-96
19. Sahdev A., Sohaib S.A., Jacobs I., et al. MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 (2001) 1307-1311
20. Shapeero L.G., and Hricak H. Mixed mullerian sarcoma of the uterus: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153 (1989) 317-319
21. Frei K.A., Kinkel K., Bonel H.M., et al. Prediction of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR imaging-a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 216 (2000) 444-449
22. Hricak H., Rubinstein L.V., Gherman G.M., et al. MR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperative study. Radiology 179 (1991) 829-832
23. Hricak H., Stern J.L., Fisher M.R., et al. Endometrial carcinoma staging by MR imaging. Radiology 162 (1987) 297-305
24. Kim S.H., Kim H.D., Song Y.S., et al. Detection of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, CT, and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19 (1995) 766-772
25. Yamashita Y., Harada M., Sawada T., et al. Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 186 (1993) 495-501
26. Nicolet V., Carignan L., Bourdon F., et al. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach. Radiographics 20 (2000) 1539-1549
27. Okamoto Y., Tanaka Y.O., Nishida M., et al. MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 23 (2003) 425-445 quiz 534-425
28. Scheidler J., and Heuck A.F. Imaging of cancer of the cervix. Radiol Clin North Am 40 (2002) 577-590
29. Jeong Y.Y., Outwater E.K., and Kang H.K. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics 20 (2000) 1445-1470
30. Hricak H., Chen M., Coakley F.V., et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate analysis. Radiology 214 (2000) 39-46
31. Tempany C.M., Zou K.H., Silverman S.G., et al. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities-report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 215 (2000) 761-767
32. Woodward P.J., Sohaey R., and Mezzetti Jr. T.P. Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 21 (2001) 193-216
33. Coakley F.V. Staging ovarian cancer: role of imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 40 (2002) 609-636
34. Ricke J., Sehouli J., Hach C., et al. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MRI in the depiction of peritoneal spread in primary or recurrent ovarian cancer. Eur Radiol 13 (2003) 943-949
35. Jeong Y.Y., Kang H.K., Chung T.W., et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 23 (2003) 969-981
36. Kinkel K., Ariche M., Tardivon A.A., et al. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology 204 (1997) 55-63
37. Low R.N., Duggan B., Barone R.M., et al. Treated ovarian cancer: MR imaging, laparotomy reassessment, and serum CA-125 values compared with clinical outcome at 1 year. Radiology 235 (2005) 918-926