Cervical carcinoma: Efficacy of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted images for evaluating parametrial invasion

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 514-519

  Shiraiwa, M ^a   Joja, I ^a   Asakawa, T ^a   Okuno, K ^a   Shibutani, O ^a   Akamatsu, N ^b   Kudo, T ^a   Hiraki, Y ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

^b HIMEJI RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Uterine neoplasms, diagnosis; Uterine neoplasms, MR; Uterine neoplasms, staging; Uterus, radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, ADENOSQUAMOUS; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PELVIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0032873542     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900552     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 1988;6:623-631
2. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Sagoh T, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;171:245-251
3. Asakawa T, Joja I, Asakawa M, et al. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with a Turbo-FLASH technique. Radiat Med 1997;15: 389-398
4. Seki H, Azuni R, Kimura M, et al. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1997; 168:1579-1585
5. Murakami T, Kurachi H, Nakamura H, et al. Cervical invasion of endometrial carcinoma evaluation by parasagittal MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1995;36:248-253
6. Joja I, Asakawa M, Asakawa T, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma with turbo-FLASH technique. JCAT 1994; 20:878-887
7. Stafl A, Mattingly RF. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: invasive carcinoma of the cervix. In: Mattingly RF, Thompson JD, eds. Linde's operative gynecology, 6th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1985;759-844
8. Grumbine FC, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA, et al. Abdominopelvic computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1981;12:286-290
9. Vick CW, Walsh JW, Weelock JB, et al. CT of the normal and abdominal parametria in cervical cancer. AJR 1984;143:597-603
10. Whitley NO, Brenner DE, Francis A, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of cervix. Radiology 1982;142:439-446
11. Walsh JW, Goplerud DR. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma. AJR 1981;137:997-1003
12. Van Nagell JR Jr, Roddick JW Jr, Lowin DM. The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971;110:973-978
13. Averette HE, Dudan RC, Ford JH Jr. Exploratory celiotomy for surgical staging of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;113: 1090-1096
14. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 1988;166:623-631
15. Rubens D, Thombuy JR, Angel C, et al. Stage 1B cervical carcinoma: comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging. AJR 1988;150:135-138
16. Waggenspack GA, Amparo EG, Hannigan EV. MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma. JCAT 1989;12:409-414
17. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Sagoh T, et al. Carcinoma of cervix: staging with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;71:245-251
18. Greco A, Mason P, Leung AWL, et al. Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: MRI-surgical correlation. Clin Radiol 1989;40:401-405
19. Boronow RC. Advance in diagnosis, staging, and management of cervical and endometrial cancer, stages 1 and 2. Cancer 1990;65: 648-659
20. Sironi S, Belloni C, Taccagni G, et al. Carcinoma of cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement. AJR 1991; 156:753-756
21. Santoni R, Bucciolini M, Chiostrini C, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in cervical carcinoma: a report on 30 cases. Br J Radiol 1991;64:498-504
22. Lien HH, Blomlie V, Kjorstad K, et al. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in determining degree of invasiveness. AJR 1991;156:1191-1194
23. Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka RC, et al. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 181:95-106
24. Milestone BN, Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, et al. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1991;180:91-95
25. Kaji Y, Sugimura K, Kitao M, et al. Histopathology of uterine carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. JCAT 1994;18:785-792