Undermining the science or undermining Nature?

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 893-897

  Sivakumar, Bellie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40649113692     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7004     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Andréassian V, Lerat J, Loumagne C, Mathevet T, Michel C, Oudin L, Perrin C. 2007. What is really undermining hydrologic science today? Hydrological Processes 21: 2819-2822.
2. Beven KJ. 2006a. On undermining the science? Hydrological Processes 20: 3141-3146.
3. Beven KJ. 2006b. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology 320: 18-36.
4. Hall J, O'Connell E, Ewen J. 2007. On not undermining the science: coherence, validation and expertise [Discussion of Invited Commentary by Keith Beven, Hydrological Processes, 20, 3141-3146 (2006)]. Hydrological Processes 21: 985-988.
5. Kundzewicz ZW, Koutsoyiannis D. 2005. The peer-review system: prospects and challenges. Hydrological Sciences Journal 50(4): 577-590.
6. Refsgaard JC, Henriksen HJ. 2004. Modeling guidelines - terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources 27: 71-82.
7. Sevruk B. 1996. Adjustment of tipping-bucket precipitation gauge measurement. Atmospheric Research 42: 237-246.
8. Sivakumar B. 2005. Hydrologic modeling and forecasting: role of thresholds. Environmental Modelling & Software 20: 515-519.
9. Sivakumar B. 2008. Peer-review system and anonymity of reviewers: a three-pronged proposal. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering (in press).
10. Sudheer KP, Jain A. 2004. Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrological Processes 18: 833-844.
11. Todini E, Mantovan P. 2007. Comment on: 'On undermining the science' by Keith Beven. Hydrological Processes 21: 1633-1638.