Environmental values and popular conflict over environmental management: A comparative analysis of public comments on the Clinton Forest Plan

Environmental Management

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 347-358

  Proctor, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinton Forest Plan; Environmental values; Pacific Northwest; Public participation

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC ATTITUDES;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST; UNITED STATES;

USA;

DECISION MAKING; FORESTRY; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

EID: 0032073851     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679900110     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bhaskar, R. 1989. Reclaiming reality. Verso, London.
2. Booth, D. E. 1994. Valuing nature: The decline and preservation of old-growth forests. Rowman & Little field Publishers, Inc., Lanham, Maryland.
3. Cambridge Reports/Research International. 1991. Survey results on forest management policy. Conducted for the Timber Industry Labor Management Committee Report #CR 3203, 20-23 June.
4. Cortner, H. J., and M. A. Shannon. 1993. Embedding public participation in its political context. Journal of Forestry 91:14-16.
5. Dietrich, W. 1992. The final forest: The battle for the last great trees of the Pacific Northwest. Simon and Schuster, New York.
6. Ervin, K 1989. Fragile majesty: The battle for North America's last great forest. The Mountaineers, Seattle.
7. Fischer, B. C., S. G. Pennington, and B. Tormoehlen, 1993. Public involvement in Indiana forestry. Journal of Forestry 91:28-31.
8. Frasz, G. B. 1993. Environmental virtue ethics: A new direction for environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 15:259-274.
9. Griggs-Anderson Research. 1990. Forest product industry and the spotted owl controversy statewide survey II. Survey conducted for The Oregonian, 1 May 1990.
10. Gunn, A. S. 1984. Preserving rare species. Pages 289-335 in Tom Regan (ed.), Earthbound: New introductory essays in environmental ethics. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
11. Hansis, R. 1995. The social acceptability of clearcutting in the Pacific Northwest. Human Organization 54:95-101.
12. Interagency SEIS Team. 1994. Report on public comments and the analysis process. USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Environmental Protection Agency, National Marine Fisheries Service, 10 January.
13. Johnson, K. N., J. F. Franklin, J. W. Thomas, and J. Gordon. 1991. Alternatives for management of late-successional forests of the Pacific Northwest. Commissioned by the Agriculture Committee and the Merchant Marine Committee of the US House of Representatives.
14. Kempton, W., J. S. Boster, and J. A. Hartley. 1995. Environmental values in American culture. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
15. Light, A. 1995. Environmental pragmatism as philosophy or metaphilosophy? On the Weston-Katz debate. Pages 325-338 in Andrew Light and Eric Katz (ed.), Environmental pragmatism, Routledge Press, London.
16. Light, A., and E. Katz (eds.). 1995. Environmental pragmatism. Routledge Press, London.
17. Milbraith, L. W. 1984. Environmentalists: Vanguards for a new society. State University of New York Press, Albany.
18. Nash, R. 1989. The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
19. Norse, E. A. 1990. Ancient forests of the Pacific Northwest. Island Press, Washington, DC.
20. Norton, B. G. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Outhwaite, W. 1987. New philosophies of social science: Realism, hermeneutics and critical theory. Macmillan Education Ltd., London.
22. Proctor, J. D. 1997. The spotted owl and the moral landscape of the Pacific Northwest. In Jody Emel and Jennifer Wolch (ed.), Animal geographies. Verso Press, London (in press).
23. Rolston, H. I., and J. Coufal. 1991. A forest ethic and multivalue forest management. Journal of Forestry 89:35-40.
24. Rose, A., B. Stevens, and G. Davis. 1989. Assessing who gains and who loses from natural resource policy. Resources Policy 16:282-291.
25. Sample, V. A. 1993. A framework for public participation in natural resource decisionmaking. Journal of Forestry 91: 22-27.
26. Seideman, D. 1993. Showdown at Opal Creek. Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York.
27. Selin, S., and D. Chavez. 1995. Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19:189-195.
28. Shindler, B., P. List, and B. S. Steel. 1993. Managing federal forests: Public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. Journal of Forestry 91:36-42.
29. Sirmon J., W. E. Shands, and C. Liggett. 1993. Communities of interests and open decisionmaking. Journal of Forestry 91: 17-21.
30. Steel, B. S., P. List, and B. Shindler. 1994. Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society and Natural Resources Journal 7:137-15.
31. The Nelson Report. 1990. Oregon timber industry and the northern spotted owl. Prepared by the Nelson Report, 18 June, Portland, Oregon.
32. Thomas, J. W., M. G. Raphael, R. G. Anthony, et al. 1999. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon.
33. USDA-USDI 1993a. Draft supplemental environmental impact statement on management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest species within the range of the northern spotted owl. US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.
34. USDA-USDI. 1993b. Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Assessment Team, Washington, DC.
35. USDA-USDI. 1994a. Final supplemental environmental impact statement on management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest species within the range of the northern spotted owl. US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.
36. USDA-USDI. 1994b. Record of decision and standards and guidelines for management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest species within the range of the northern spotted owl. US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.
37. USDI. 1990a. 1990 status review: Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). US Fish and Wildlife Service, 30 April.
38. USDI. 1990b. Determination of threatened status for the northern spotted owl; final rule. Federal Register 55:26114-26194.
39. USDI. 1992a. Determination of critical habitat for the northern spotted owl; final rule. Federal Register 57:1796-1838.
40. USDI. 1992b. Draft recovery plan for the northern spotted owl. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service Spotted Owl Recovery Team, April.
41. Weston, A. 1992. Toward better problems: New perspectives on abortion, animal rights, the environment, and justice. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
42. Yaffee, S. L. 1994. The wisdom of the spotted owl: Policy lessons for a new century. Island Press, Washington, DC.