Comparison of spectral analysis techniques for impervious surface estimation using landsat imagery

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 74, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1045-1055

  Yuan, Fei ^a   Wu, Changshan ^b   Bauer, Marvin E ^c  

^a MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ESTIMATION; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; PERCENT IMPERVIOUS SURFACES; REMOTE SENSING IMAGERY; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; SPECTRAL MIXTURE ANALYSIS; URBAN IMPERVIOUS SURFACES;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTIMATION METHOD; LANDSAT; METROPOLITAN AREA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS;

MINNESOTA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 50249177593     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.74.8.1045     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, J.B., D.E. Sabol, V. Kapos, R. Almeida-Filho, D.A. Roberts, M.O. Smith, and A.R. Gillespie, 1995. Classification of multiple images based on fractions of endmembers: Application to land-cover change in the Brazilian Amazon, Remote Sensing of Environment, 52:137-154.
2. Bauer, M.E., N.J. Heinert, J.K. Doyle, and F. Yuan, 2004. Impervious surface mapping and change monitoring using satellite remote sensing, Proceedings of the ASPRS 2004 Annual Conference, 24-28 May, Denver, Colorado, unpaginated CD-ROM.
3. Bauer, M.E., B.C. Loeffelholz, and B. Wilson, 2007. Estimating and mapping impervious surface area by regression analysis of Landsat imagery, Remote Sensing of Impervious Surfaces (Q. Weng, editor), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 3-20.
4. Breiman, L., J.H. Friedman, R.A. Olshen, and C.J. Stone, 1984. Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, California, 358 p.
5. Chander, G., and B. Markham, 2003. Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(11):2674-2677.
6. Chabaeva, A., D.L. Civco, and S. Prisloe, 2004. Development of a population density and land use based regression model to calculate the amount of imperviousness, Proceedings of the ASPRS 2004 Annual Conference, 24-28 May, Denver, Colorado, unpaginated CD-ROM.
7. Civco, D.L., and J.D. Hurd, 1997. Impervious surface mapping for the state of Connecticut, Proceedings of the ASPRS 1997 Annual Conference, 07-10 April, Seattle, Washington, pp. 124-135.
8. Civco, D.L., J.D. Hurd, E.H. Wilson, C.L. Arnold, and M.P. Prisloe, Jr., 2002. Quantifying and describing urbanizing landscapes in the Northeast United States, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 68(10):1083-1090.
9. Civco, D.L., A. Chabaeva, and J. Parent, 2006. A comparison of approaches to impervious surface characterization, Proceedings of IGARSS Convention, Denver, Colorado (IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), unpaginated CD-ROM.
10. Crist, E.P., and R.C. Cicone, 1984. A physically-based transformation of Thematic Mapper data - The TM tasseled cap, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 22(3):256-263.
11. Crist, E.P., and R.J. Kauth, 1986. The tasseled cap de-mystified, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52(1):81-86.
12. Cybenko, G., 1996. Theme editor's introduction: Neural networks in computational science and engineering, IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 3(1):36-42.
13. Dougherty, M., R.L. Dymond, S.J. Goetz, C.A. Jantz, and N. Goulet, 2004. Evaluation of impervious surface estimates in a rapidly urbanizing watershed, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(11):1275-1284.
14. Flanagan, M., and D.L. Civco, 2001. Subpixel impervious surface mapping, Proceedings of ASPRS Annual Conference, 23-27 April, St. Louis, Missouri, unpaginated CD-ROM.
15. Foody, G.M., and D.P. Cox, 1994. Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a linear mixture model and fuzzy membership functions, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(3):619-631.
16. Foody, G.M., 2002. Hard and soft classifications by a neural network with a nonexhaustively defined set of classes, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(18):3853-3864.
17. Gillies, R.R., J B. Box, J. Symanzik, and E.J. Rodemaker, 2003. Effects of urbanization on the aquatic fauna of the Line Creek watershed, Atlanta-A satellite perspective, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86:411-422.
18. Homer, C., J. Dewitz, J. Fry, M. Coan, N. Hossain, C. Larson, N. Herold, A. McKerrow, J.N. VanDriel, and J. Wickham, 2007. Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73(4):337-341.
19. Huang, C., and J.R.G. Townshend, 2003. A stepwise regression tree for nonlinear approximation: Applications to estimating subpixel land cover, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(1):75-90.
20. Huang, C., L. Yang, B. Wylie, and C. Homer, 2001. A strategy for estimating tree canopy density using Landsat 7 ETM+ and high resolution images over large areas, Proceedings of Third International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry, 05-07 November, Denver, Colorado, unpaginated CD-ROM.
21. Ji, M., and J.R. Jensen, 1999. Effectiveness of subpixel analysis in detecting and quantifying urban imperviousness from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery, Geocarto International, 14(4):33-41.
22. Lee, S., and R.G. Lathrop, 2006. Subpixel analysis of Landsat ETM+ using self-organizing map (SOM) neural networks for urban land cover characterization, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing; 44(6):1642-1654.
23. Lin, C., Y. Lee, and H. Pu, 2000. Satellite sensor image classification using cascaded architecture of neural fuzzy network, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(2):1033-1043.
24. Liu, W., and E.Y. Wu, 2005. Comparison of non-linear mixture models: Sub-pixel classification, Remote Sensing of Environment 94(2):145-285.
25. Lu, D., and Q. Weng, 2004. Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscape in Indianapolis city with Landsat ETM+ imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(9):1053-1062.
26. Lu, D., and Q. Weng, 2006. Use of impervious surface in urban land use classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 102(1-2):146-160.
27. Moller-Jensen, L., 1990. Knowledge-based classification of an urban area using texture and context information in Landsat-TM imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56(6):899-904.
28. Phinn, S., M.S. Scarth, A.T. Murray, and P.T. Shyy, 2002. Monitoring the composition of urban environments based on the vegetation-impervious surface-soil (VIS) model by subpixel analysis techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(20):4131-4153.
29. Quinlan, J.R., 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California, 302 p.
30. Rashed, T., J.R. Weeks, and M.S. Gadalla, 2001. Revealing the anatomy of cities through spectral mixture analysis of multispectral satellite imagery: A case study of the greater Cairo region, Egypt, Geocarto International, 16(4):5-15.
31. Rashed, T., J. Weeks, D. Roberts, J. Rogan, and R. Powell, 2003, Measuring the physical compositions of urban morphology using multiple endmember spectral mixture models, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(9):1011-1020.
32. Rashed, T., J.R. Weeks, D. Stow, and D. Fugate, 2005. Measuring temporal compositions of urban morphology through spectral mixture analysis: Toward a soft approach to change analysis in crowded cities, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(4):699-718.
33. Ridd, M.K., 1995. Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16:2165-2185.
34. Sawaya, K.E., L.G. Olmanson, N.J. Heinert, P.L. Brezonik, and M.E. Bauer, 2003. Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales: Land and water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 88:144-156.
35. Schowengerdt, R.A., 2007. Remote Sensing: Models and Methods for Image Processing, Third edition, Academic Press, 515 p.
36. Schueler, T.R., 1994. The importance of imperviousness, Watershed Protection Techniques, 1(3):100-110.
37. Small, C., 2003. High spatial resolution spectral mixture analysis of urban reflectance, Remote Sensing of Environment, 88:170-186.
38. Stefanov, W.L., M.S. Ramsey, and P.R. Christensen, 2001. Monitoring urban land cover change: An expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers, Remote Sensing of Environment, 77:173-185.
39. U.S. Environmental Protecting Agency, 2003. Draft report on the environment, URL: http://www.epa.gov/indicators/, U.S. EPA (last date accessed: 07 May 2008).
40. Walsh, T.A., and T.E. Burk, 1993. Calibration of satellite classifications of land area, Remote Sensing of Environment, 46:281-290.
41. Weng, Q., 2001. A remote sensing-GIS evaluation of urban expansion and its impact on surface temperature in the Zhujiang Delta, China, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(10):1999-2014.
42. Wu, C., 2004. Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93:480-492.
43. Wu, C., and A. Murray, 2003, Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis, Remote Sensing of Environment, 84:493-505.
44. Wu, C., and F. Yuan, 2007. Seasonal sensitivity analysis of impervious surface estimation with satellite imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73(12):1393-1401.
45. Xian, G., and M. Crane, 2005, Assessments of urban growth in the Tampa Bay Watershed using remote sensing data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 97:203-215.
46. Xu, M., P. Watanachaturaporn, P.K. Varshney, and M.K. Arora, 2005. Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 97:322-336.
47. Yang, L., C. Huang, C.G. Homer, B.K. Wylie, and M.J. Coan, 2003a. An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: synergistic use of Landsat-7 ETM+ and high spatial resolution imagery, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(2):230-240.
48. Yang, L., G. Xian, J.M. Klaver, and B. Deal, 2003b. Urban land-cover change detection through sub-pixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(9):1003-1010.
49. Yuan, F., and M.E. Bauer, 2007. Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 106(2):375-386.
50. Yuan, F., M.E. Bauer, N.J. Heinert, and G. Holden, 2005a. Multi-level land cover mapping of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area with multi-seasonal Landsat TM/ETM+ data, Geocarto International, 20(2):5-14.
51. Yuan, F., K.E. Sawaya, B.C. Loeffelholz, and M.E. Bauer, 2005b. Land cover mapping and change analysis in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area with Landsat remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(2-3):317-328.