Distinctive shapes benefit short-term memory for color associations, but not for color

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1024-1031

  Delvenne, Jean François ^a   Dent, Kevin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; REACTION TIME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 50249170434     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.6.1024     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AARONSON, D., & WATTS, B. (1987). Extensions of Grier's computational formulas for A' and B" to below-chance performance. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 439-442.
2. ALVAREZ, G. A., & CAVANAGH, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106-111.
3. BADDELEY, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. BIEDERMAN, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
5. CLIFFORD, C. W. G., HOLCOMBE, A. O., & PEARSON, J. (2004). Rapid global form binding with loss of associated colors. Journal of Vision, 4, 1090-1101.
6. DELVENNE, J.-F., & BRUYER, R. (2004). Does visual short-term memory store bound features? Visual Cognition, 11, 1-27.
7. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
8. GRIER, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424-429.
9. HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2001). A multi-stage account of binding in vision: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition, 8, 381-410.
10. HUMPHREYS, G. W., CINEL, C., WOLFE, J., OLSON, A., & KLEMPEN, N. (2000). Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features. Vision Research, 40, 1569-1596.
11. IRWIN, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 307-317.
12. IRWIN, D. E., & ANDREWS, R. V. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 125-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. KANWISHER, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
14. LEE, D., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). What are the units of visual short-term memory, objects or spatial locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 253-257.
15. LUCK, S. J., & VOGEL, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 309, 279-281.
16. LUCK, S. J., & VOGEL, E. K. (1998). Response from Luck and Vogel. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 78-80.
17. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. MARR, D., & NISHIHARA, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 200, 269-294.
19. PASHLER, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
20. PRICE, C. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 797-827.
21. SCHYNS, P. G. (1998). Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information, and their interactions. Cognition, 67, 147-179.
22. SINGER, W., & GRAY, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 555-586.
23. SPERLING, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74(11, Whole No. 498), 1-29.
24. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & SCHMIDT, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
25. TULVING, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting. American Scientist, 62, 74-82.
26. TULVING, E., & THOMSON, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
27. VOGEL, E. K., WOODMAN, G. F., & LUCK, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92-114.
28. WHEELER, M. E., & TREISMAN, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48-64.
29. WOJCIULIK, E., HUSAIN, M., CLARKE, K., & DRIVER, J. (2001). Spatial working memory deficit in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 39, 390-396.
30. Xu, Y. (2002a). Encoding color and shape from different parts of an object in visual short-term memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1260-1280.
31. Xu, Y. (2002b). Limitations of object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 458-468.
32. Xu, Y. (2006). Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: The roles of feature proximity and connectedness. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 815-828.