UTAPS: An underlying topology-aware peer selection algorithm in BitTorrent

Proceedings - International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 539-545

  Li, Wei ^a   Chen, Shanzhi ^a,b   Yu, Tao ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^b China Academy of Telecommunication Technology

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIT TORRENT; DOWNLOAD TIME; INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION NETWORKING; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; INTERNET TRAFFIC; OVERLAY NETWORKS; P2P OVERLAY NETWORKS; PEER SELECTION; PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING; ROUND-TRIP TIME; SIMULATION RESULTS;

INJECTION (OIL WELLS); INTERNET; INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS; TOPOLOGY;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 50249147904     PISSN: 1550445X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/AINA.2008.92     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cohen B. Incentives builds robustness in Bit Torrent. First Workshop on Economics of P2P Systems. Berkeley, CA.2003.
2. http://www.bigchampagne.com/
3. CacheLogic. Cachelogic - advanced solutions for peer-to-peer networks, http://www.cachelogic.com.
4. D. M et al. Can Network Coding Help in P2P Networks? International Symposium on Modeling and. Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, Boston, Massachusetts, April 2006.
5. [P. Felber and E. W. Biersack. Self-scaling networks for content distribution. International Workshop on Self-star Properties in Complex Information Systems, Bertinoro, Italy, May-June 20
6. A. R. Bharambe, C. Herley, and V. N. Padmanabhan.Analysing and improving bittorrent performance. IEEE Infocom'2006, Barcelona, Spain, April 2006.
7. A. Bharambe, C. Herley, and V. N. Padmanabhan. Understanding and deconstructing bittorrent performance. SIGMETRICS, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2005.
8. L. Guo, S. Chen, Z. Xiao, E. Tan, X. Ding, and X. Zhang. Measurements, analysis and modeling of bittorrent-like systems. The Internet Measurement Conference Berkeley, CA, USA, 2005.
9. Arnaud Legout, Guillaume Urvoy-Keller and Pietro Michiardi. Rarest first and choke algorithms are enough. IMC'2006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2006.
10. Ruchir Bindal et al. Improving Traffic Locality in BitTorrent via Biased Neighbor Selection. IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Lisboan, Portugal ,July 2006
11. T. S. Eugene Ng et al. Measurement-Based Optimization Techniques for Bandwidth-Demanding Peer-to-Peer Systems. IEEE INFOCOM'03, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2003.
12. D.S. Bernstein et al. Adaptive Peer Selection.2nd International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003.
13. M. Hefeeda et al. PROMISE: Peer-to-Peer Media Streaming Using CollectCast. ACM Multimedia, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003.
14. P-Cube. P-cube: IP service control. http://www.pcube.net/indexold.shtml.
15. M. Coates et al. Internet tomography. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(3), 2002.
16. Simon G. M et al. A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Neighbor-Selection Strategy for Hybrid Peer-to-Peer Networks. ICCCN 2004, Chicago USA,2004
17. Pei G,Gerla M. Fisheye State Routing : A Routing Scheme For Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. IEEE ICC'00, New Orleans, USA, June 2000.
18. http://xbtt.sourceforge.net/