Dissociations in rod bisection: The effect of viewing conditions on perception and action

Cortex

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1279-1287

  Hughes, Laura E ^a   Bates, Timothy C ^a   Aimola Davies, Anne M ^a,b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular; Monocular; Pseudoneglect; Visual illusion; Visual occlusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; RETINA ROD; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 50149106087     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Birch H.G., Proctor F., Bortner M., and Lowenthal M. Perception in hemiplegia II: judgement of the median plane. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 41 (1960) 71-75
2. Bowers D., and Heilman K.M. Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line-bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18 (1980) 491-498
3. Bridgeman B., Peery S., and Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception and Psychophysics 59 (1997) 456-469
4. Bridgeman B., Gemmer A., Forsman T., and Huemer V. Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Research 40 (2000) 3539-3552
5. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 379-382
6. Carey D.P. Do action systems resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 109-113
7. Edwards M.G., and Humphreys G.W. Pointing and grasping in unilateral visual neglect: effect of on-line visual feedback in grasping. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 959-973
8. Ellis R.R., Flanagan J.R., and Lederman S.J. The influence of visual illusions on grasp position. Experimental Brain Research 125 (1999) 109-114
9. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bulthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 20-25
10. Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (1998) 122-136
11. Heilman K.M., and Van den Abel T. Right hemispheric dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 30 (1980) 327-330
12. Hjaltason H., Caneman G., and Tegner R. Visual and tactile rod-bisection in unilateral neglect. Cortex 29 (1993) 583-588
13. Hu Y., and Goodale M.A. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (2000) 856-868
14. Hughes LE. Visual Perception, Attention and Action. Unpublished PhD, Sydney: Macquarie University, 2005.
15. Hughes L.E., Bates T.C., and Aimola Davies A. Grasping at sticks: dissociations between perception and action. Experimental Brain Research 157 (2004) 397-402
16. Hughes L.E., Bates T.C., and Aimola Davies A.M. The effects of local and global processing demands on perception and action. Brain and Cognition 59 (2005) 71-81
17. Jackson S.R., Jones C.A., Newport R., and Pritchard C.A. Kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Visual Cognition 4 (1997) 113-142
18. Jackson S.R., Newport R., and Shaw A. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements. Current Biology 12 (2002) 237-240
19. Jeannerod M., and Biguer B. The Directional Coding of Reaching Movements. A Visuomotor Conception of Spatial Neglect (1987), Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland
20. Jewell G., and McCourt M.E. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line-bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 93-110
21. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica 33 (1970) 193-201
22. Loftus A., Servos P., Goodale M.A., Mendarozqueta N., and Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Experimental Brain Research 158 (2004) 317-327
23. Marotta J.J., Behrmann M., and Goodale M.A. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research 116 (1997) 113-121
24. Marotta J.J., DeSouza J.F., Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture?. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 491-497
25. Mesulam M.M. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 354 (1999) 1325-1346
26. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain in Action (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
27. McIntosh R.D., McClements K.I., Dijkerman H.C., Birchall D., and Milner A.D. Preserved obstacle avoidance during reaching in patients with left visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 42 (2004) 1107-1117
28. Mon-Williams M., and Dijkerman H.C. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research 128 (1999) 578-582
29. Mon-Williams M., Tresilian J.R., McIntosh R.D., and Milner A.D. Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III). Experimental Brain Research 139 (2001) 127-136
30. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-114
31. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Kinsbourne M., and Moscovitch M. Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain and Cognition 12 (1990) 240-266
32. Robertson I.H., Nico D., and Hood B.M. The intention to act improves unilateral left neglect: two demonstrations. Neuroreport 7 (1995) 246-248
33. Robertson I.H. Cognitive rehabilitation: attention and neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999) 385-393
34. Rossetti Y., Revol P., McIntosh R., Pisella L., Rode G., Danckert J., Tilikete C., Dijkerman H.C., Boisson D., Vighetto A., Michel F., and Milner A.D. Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 162-177
35. Schindler I., Rice N.J., McIntosh R.D., Rossetti Y., Vighetto A., and Milner A.D. Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: evidence from optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 779-784
36. Servos P., and Goodale M.A. Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research 98 (1994) 119-127
37. Servos P., Goodale M.A., and Jakobson L.S. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Research 32 (1992) 1513-1521
38. Smeets J.B.J., Brenner E., de Grave D.D.J., and Cuijpers R.H. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Experimental Brain Research 147 (2002) 135-144
39. Westwood D.A., Chapman C.D., and Roy E.A. Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Experimental Brain Research 130 (2000) 545-548
40. Westwood D.A., and Goodale M.A. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision 16 (2003) 243-254
41. Westwood D.A., Heath M., and Roy E.A. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research 134 (2000) 456-463
42. Westwood D.A., McEachern T., and Roy E.A. Delayed grasping of a Muller-Lyer figure. Experimental Brain Research 141 (2001) 166-173