Frames and knowledge in mixed media: How activation changes information intake

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 443-450

  Veenstra, Aaron S ^a   Sayre, Ben ^a   Shah, Dhavan V ^a   McLeod, Douglas M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; MASS COMMUNICATION; MASS MEDIUM; NETWORK LEARNING; POLITICAL SYSTEM; READING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; JOURNALISM; JUDGMENT; MASS MEDIA; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POLITICS; PROPAGANDA; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; PUBLIC OPINION; READING; RESEARCH DESIGN; STEM CELLS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 50149091811     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0033     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Entman RM. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993;43:51-8.
2. Gamson WA, Modigliani A. (1987) The changing culture of affirmative action. In Braungart RG, Braungart MM, eds. Research in political sociology, vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 137-77.
3. Ball-Rokeach SJ, Loges WE. (1996) Making choices: media roles in the construction of value-choices. In Seligman C, Olson JM, Zanna MP, eds. The psychology of values: the Ontario Symposium, vol. 8. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Shah DV, Domke D, Wackman DB. "To thine own self be true": values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research 1996; 23:509-60.
5. Jamieson KH. (1992) Dirty politics: deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Lawrence RG. Game-framing the issues: tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication 2000; 17:93-114.
7. Patterson TE. (1994) Out of order. New York: Vintage Books.
8. See Domke D, McCoy K, Torres M. News media, racial perceptions, and political cognition. Communication Research 1999; 26:570-607.
9. See Iyengar S. (1991) Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Price V, Tewksbury D. (1997) News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In Barnett G, Boster FJ, eds. Progress in the Communication Sciences. New York: Ablex.
11. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12. Kohring M, Matthes J. The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: how the German press framed modern biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 2002;11:143-54.
13. Priest SH. Cloning: a study in news production. Public Understanding of Science 2001; 10:59-69.
14. Nisbet MC, Brossard D, Kroepsch A. Framing science: the stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Press/Politics 2003; 8:36-70.
15. Cappella JN, Jamieson KH. (1997) The spiral of cynicism: the press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Simon HA. (1979). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. In Simon HA, ed. Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Chaffee SH, Frank S. How Americans get political information: print versus broadcast news. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1996; 546:48-58.
18. Martinelli KA, Chaffee SH. Measuring new-voter learning via three channels of political information. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 1995;72:18-32.
19. Eveland Jr. WP, Dunwoody S. Examining information processing on the World Wide Web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology 2000; 2:219-44.
20. Norris P, Sanders D. Message or medium? Campaign learning during the 2001 British general election. Political Communication 2003; 20:232-62.
21. Holbert RL. Intramedia mediation: the cumulative and complementary effects of news media use. Political Communication 2005; 22:447-61.
22. Martinelli KA, Chaffee SH. Measuring new-voter learning via three channels of political information. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 1995;72:18-32.
23. Baum MA. Soft news and political knowledge: evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication 2003; 20:173-90.
24. Prior M. Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication 2003; 20:149-71.
25. Hollander BA. Late-night learning: do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 2005; 49:402-15.
26. de Vreese CM. The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 2004; 81:36-52.
27. Valkenburg PM, Semetko HA, de Vreese CM. The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communication Research 1999; 26:550-69.
28. Zaller JR. (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Keppel G. (1991). Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Cohen J, Cohen P. (1975) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. BlogAds 2006 reader survey. www.blogads.com/survey/ 2006_political_blogs_reader_survey.html (accessed Mar. 25, 2007).
32. Brians CL, Wattenberg MP. Campaign issue knowledge and salience: comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science 1996; 40:172-93.
33. Geer JG. (2006) In defense of negativity: attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Bellini CGP, Vargas LM. Rationale for Internet-mediated communities. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2003; 6:3-14.