Biodiversity value and the optimal location of forest conservation sites in Southern Finland

Ecological Economics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 232-243

  Kallio, A Maarit I ^a   Hänninen, Riitta ^a   Vainikainen, Nina ^a   Luque, Sandra ^b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Forest biodiversity protection; Forest sector; Habitat quality models

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT QUALITY; OPTIMIZATION; VALUATION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 49949088441     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ando A., Camm J., Polasky S., and Solow A. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279 (1998) 2126-2128
2. Bolkesjø T.F., Trømborg E., and Solberg B. Increasing forest conservation in Norway: consequences for timber and forest products markets. Environmental & Resource Economics 31 1 (2005) 95-115
3. Calkin D.E., Montgomery C.A., Schumaker N.H., Polasky S., Arthur J.L., and Nalle D.J. Developing a production possibility set of wildlife species persistence and timber harvest value. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32 (2002) 1329-1342
4. Environmental statement library webpage (URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/es_library/library_en.htm).
5. Esseen P.A., Ehnström B., Ericson L., and Sjöberg K. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46 (1997) 16-47
6. Finnish Forest Insdustries Federation webpage. (URL: http://www.forestindustries.fi/julkaisut/).
7. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Finnish Forest Research Institute. Vammala (2006) 438 pp.
8. Hanski I. Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. Annales Zoologici Fennici 37 4 (2000) 271-280
9. Hildén M., Auvinen A.-P., and Primmer E. Suomen biodiversiteettiohjeman arviointi. (Evaluation of the Finnish national action plan for biodiversity). Finnish Environment vol. 770 (2005), Edita, Helsinki 251 pp.
10. Horne P., Karppinen H., and Ylinen E. Kansalaisten mielipiteet metsien monimuotoisuuden turvaamisessa. In: Horne P., Koskela T., and Ovaskainen V. (Eds). Metsänomistajien ja kansalaisten näkemykset metsäluonnon monimuotoisuuden turvaamisessa. Abstract: Safeguarding forest biodiversity in Finland {box drawings light horizontal} Citizen's and non-industrial private forest owners' views. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 933 (2004). 951-40-1943-1
11. Hänninen R., and Kallio A.M.I. Economic impacts on the forest sector of increasing forest biodiversity conservation in Finland. Silva Fennica 41 3 (2006) 507-523
12. Hänninen R., Mutanen A., and Toppinen A. Puun tarjonta Suomessa-aluetason ekonometrinen tarkastelu 1983-2004 (Supply of roundwood in Finland-econometric analysis at the regional level 1983-2004). Metlan Työraportteja 29 (2006) 39 p
13. Ihalainen A., and Siitonen J. Lahopuuston määrä talousmetsissä ja suojelualueilla VMI9 tulosten perusteella (Volume of dead wood in managed forests and in protected forest areas, results from the 9th National Forest Inventory of Finland). In: Horne P., Koskela T., Kuusinen M., Otsamo A., and Syrjänen K. (Eds). Metson jäljillä. Etelä-Suomen metsien monimuotoisuusohjelman tutkimusraportti (2006) 78-79
14. Johnston K., Verhoef J.M., Krivoruchko K., and Lucas N. Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst (2001), ESRI Press, Redlands 300 pp.
15. Johst K., Drechsler M., and Wätzold F. An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures. Ecological Economics 41 (2002) 37-49
16. Kallio A.M.I., Moiseyev A., and Solberg B. The global forest sector model EFI-GTM-the model structure. EFI Technical Report 15 (2004) 24 pp.
17. Kallio A.M.I., Moiseyev A., and Solberg B. Economics impacts of increased forest conservation in Europe: a forest sector model analysis. Environmental Science and Policy 9 (2006) 457-465 (2006)
18. Korhonen K.T., Ihalainen A., Heikkinen J., Henttonen H., and Pitkänen J. Suomen metsävarat metsäkeskuksittain 2004-2006 ja metsävarojen kehitys 1996-2006 (Finland's forest resources by forestry centers 2004-2006 and the growing stock 1996-2006). Metsätieteen Aikakauskirja 2B (2007) 149-213 /2007
19. Kouki J. Biodiversity in the Fennoscandian boreal forests: natural variation and its management. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31 (1994) 1-217
20. Kouki J., and Löfman S. Forest fragmentation: processes, concepts and implications for especies. In: Dover J.W., and Bunce R.G.H. (Eds). Key Concepts of Landscape Ecology (1998), IALE (UK), Preston 187-203
21. Lehtonen E., Kuuluvainen J., Pouta E., Rekola M., and Li C.-Z. Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland. Environmental Science and Policy 6 3 (2003) 195-204
22. Leppänen J., Linden M., Uusivuori J., and Pajuoja H. The private cost and timber market implications of increasing strict forest conservation in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 71-83
23. Luque, S., Vainikainen, N., 2008. Habitat quality assessment and modelling for biodiversity sustainability at the forest landscape level. In: Lafortezza, R., Chen, J., Sanesi, G., Crow, T. (Eds.), Patterns and Processes in Forest landscapes: Multiple Use and Sustainable Management - Part III Landscape-scale indicators and projection models. Springer publications.
24. Martikainen P., Siitonen J., Punttila P., Kaila L., and Rauh J. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 94 (2000) 199-209
25. McCoy J., and Johnston K. Using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst (2001), ESRI Press, Redlands 240 pp.
26. Metla webpage. (URL:www.metla.fi/metinfo).
27. Ministry of the Environment. Metsien suojelun tarve Etelä-Suomessa ja Pohjanmaalla. Etelä-Suomen ja Pohjnamaan metsien suojelun tarve-työrymän mietintö (Abstract: Forest protection in southern Finland and Ostrobotnia). The Finnish Environment vol. 437 (2000), Edita Ltd., Helsinki 284 pp.
28. Ministry of Environment. 2004. METSO - The forest biodiversity programme for southern Finland 2002-2007.URL: http://wwwb.mmm.fi/metso/TIEDOTUSMATERIAALI/esitteet_ja_kalvosarjat/metso_booklet.pdf
29. Nalle D.J., Montgomery C.A., Arthur J.L., Polasky S., and Schumaker N.H. Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 (2004) 997-1017
30. Nuutinen T., Hirvelä H., Salminen O., and Härkönen K. Alueeelliset hakkuumahdollisuudet valtakunnan metsien 10. inventoinnin perusteella, maastotyöt 2004-2006. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 2B/2007: 215-248. (Harvesting possibilities by forestry centers based on the NFI10) (2007)
31. Paperprofile webpage. (URL: http://www.paperprofile.com/).
32. Piiparinen, H. 2001. Julkinen metsäonmistus - Metsähallituksen toimintaan vaikuttaneet tekijät. Master's thesis. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, 104 p. [The public forest ownership - factors affecting the conduct of Metsähallitus].
33. Polasky S., Camm J.D., and Garber-Yonts B. Selecting biological reserves cost effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Economics 77 (2001) 68-78
34. Polasky S., Nelson E., Londsdorf E., Fackler P., and Starfield A. Conserving species in a working landscape: land use with biological and economic objectives. Ecological Applications 15 4 (2005) 1387-1401
35. Pukkala T., Kangas J., Kniivilä M., and Tiainen A.-M. Integrating forest-level and compartment-level indices of species diversity with numerical forest planning. Silva Fennica 31 4 (1997) 417-429
36. Rassi P., Alanen A., Kanerva T., and Mannerkoski I. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuuus 2000. (English summary: Threatened species in Finland 2000). Uhanalaisten lajien II seurantaryhmä (2001) 432 pp.
37. Romero-Calcerrada R., and Luque S. Habitat quality assessment using Weights-of-Evidence based GIS modelling: the case of Picoides tridactylus as keystone species indicator of the biodiversity value of the Finnish forest. Ecological Modelling 196 (2006) 62-76
38. Ronnila M. Medium-term scenarios for the Finnish pulp and paper industry. International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. IIASA WP-95-38. Laxenburg (1995) 104 pp.
39. Samuelson P.A. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. The American Economic Review 42 3 (1952) 283-303
40. Siitonen J. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins 49 (2001) 1-32
41. Siitonen J., Kaila L., Kuusinen M., Martikainen P., Penttilä R., Punttila P., and Rauh J. Vanhojen talousmetsien ja luonnonmetsien rakenteen ja lajiston erot Etelä-Suomessa (Differences in structure and species composition between managed old-growth forests and natural forests in Southern Finland. In: Siitonen J. (Ed). Monimuotoinen metsä. Metsäluonnon monimuotoisuuden tutkimusohjelman loppuraportti. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 812 (2001) 25-53
42. Solberg B., Moiseyev A., and Kallio A.M.I. Economic impacts of accelerating forest growth in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 5 2 (2003) 157-171
43. Store R., and Kangas J. Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling. Landscape and Urban Planning 55 2 (2001) 79-93
44. Tilli T., Toivonen R., and Toppinen A. Havukuidun tuonti ja kotimaan puumarkkinat. Abstract: imports of pine and spruce pulpwood and pulpwood markets in Finland. Pellervo Economic Research Institute Working Papers 53 (2002) 36 pp.
45. Tomppo E. The Finnish National Forest Inventory. In: Kangas A., and Maltamo M. (Eds). Forest inventory. Methodology and applications. Managing Forest Ecosystems vol. 10 (2006), Springer, Dordrecht 179-194
46. Virkkala R. Metsien suojelualueverkon rakenne ja kehittämistarpeet - ekologinen lähestymistapa. (Reserve network of forests in Finland and the need for developing the network - an ecological approach.). Finnish Environment vol. 16 (1996), Edita, Helsinki 53 pp.
47. Virkkala R., Korhonen K.T., Haapanen R., and Aapala K. Metsien ja soiden suojelutilanne metsä-ja suokasvillisuusvyöhykkeittäin valtakunnan metsien 8. inventoinnin perusteella (The state of protection of forests and mires by vegetation zones based on the NFI8). Finnish Environment 395 (2000) 49 p
48. Väisänen R., and Järvinen O. How are extensive, human-caused habitat alterations expressed on the scale of local bird populations in boreal forests?. Ornis Scandinavica 17 (1996) 282-292