Innovations in urban design and urban form: The making of paradigms and the implications for public policy

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-72

  Garde, Ajay M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b District Center   (India)

Author keywords

Paradigms; Public policy; Urban design innovations; Urban form

Indexed keywords

EID: 49849098828     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X08321733     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Banerjee, T. 1993. Market planning, market planners, and planned markets. Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (3):353-60.
2. Banerjee, T. 2001. The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (1):9-24.
3. Banerjee, T., and W.C. Baer. 1984. Beyond the neighborhood unit: Residential environments and public policy. New York: Plenum.
4. Banerjee, T., G. Giuliano, G. Hise, and D. Sloane. 1996. Invented and reinvented streets: Designing the new shopping experience. Lusk Review 1 (2):18-31.
5. Berke, P.R. 2002. Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature 17 (1):21-36.
6. Berke, P.R., J. MacDonald, N. White, M. Holmes, D. Line, K. Oury, and R. Ryznar. 2003. Greening development to protect watersheds: Does new urbanism make a difference? Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (4):397-413.
7. Blakely, E., and M.G. Snyder. 1997. Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
8. Boyer, C.M. 1983. Dreaming the rational city: The myth of American city planning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Boyer, C.M. 1990. The return of aesthetics to city planning. In Philosophical streets: New approaches to urbanism, ed. D. Crow, 93-112. Washington DC: Maisonneuve.
10. Congress for the New Urbanism. 2000. Charter of the new urbanism, ed. M. Leccese and K. McCormick. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Cranz, G. 1982. The politics of park design: A history of urban parks in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Crawford, M. 1992. The world in a shopping mall. In Variations on a theme park, ed. M. Sorkin, 3-30. New York: Noonday.
13. Dahir, J. 1947. The neighborhood unit plan, its spread and acceptance: A selected bibliography with interpretive comments. New York: Russell Sage.
14. Domosh, M. 1996. Invented cities: The creation of landscape in nineteenth-century New York and Boston. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Downs, A. 1973. Opening up the suburbs: An urban strategy for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Duany, A. 1999. Interview with author, April 19, 1999, Kentlands, Maryland.
17. Duany, A., and E. Plater-Zyberk. 1991. Towns and town-making principles. New York: Rizzoli.
18. Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point.
19. Ewing, R. 1997. Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable ? Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1):107-26.
20. Frieden, B.J., and L.B. Sagalyn. 1989. Downtown Inc. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Fulton, W. 1996. The new urbanism: Hype or hope for American communities? Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
22. Garde, A. 2004. New urbanism as sustainable growth? A supply side story and its implications for public policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (2):154-70.
23. Garde, A. 2006. Designing and developing new urbanist projects in the United States: Insights and implications. Journal of Urban Design 11 (1):33-54.
24. Garreau, J. 1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.
25. Gordon, P., and H.W. Richardson. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1):95-106.
26. Grant, J. 2006. Planning the good community: New urbanism in theory and practice. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
27. Healey, P. 1996. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23:217-34.
28. Irazábal, C. 2006. Localizing urban design traditions: Gated and edge cities in curitiba. Journal of Urban Design 11 (1):73-96.
29. Irazábal, C., and S. Chakravarty. 2007. Comparative study of entertainment-retail centers in Hong Kong and Los Angeles. International Planning Studies 12 (3):237-67.
30. Isaacs, R. 1948. The "neighborhood unit" is an instrument of segregation. Journal of Housing 5:215-19.
31. Katz, P. 1994. The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Kelbaugh, D. 2005. Preface. In Everyday urbanism: Margaret Crawford vs. Michael Speaks, ed. R. Mehrotra. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
33. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Lang, J. 2005. Urban design: A typology of procedures and products. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Architectural.
35. Logan, J.R., and H.L. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and T. Banerjee. 1993. The negotiated plaza: Design and development of corporate open space in downtown Los Angeles and San Francisco. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13:1-12.
37. Low, S. 2003. Behind the gates: Life, security and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York: Routledge.
38. Lynch, K. 1981. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Madanipour, A. 1996. Design of urban space. New York: Wiley.
40. Mehrotra, R. 2005. Everyday urbanism: Margaret Crawford vs. Michael Speaks. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
41. Moore, C., ed. 1970. Plan of Chicago. New York: Da Capo.
42. Mumford, L. 1961. The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
43. Myers, D., and E. Gearin. 2001. Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments. Housing Policy Debate 12 (4):633-59.
44. Oldenburg, R. 1989. The great good place. New York: Paragon House.
45. Perry, C.A. 1929. The neighborhood unit (Monograph I). In Neighborhood and community planning, of the regional survey of New York and its environs (vol. 7). New York: Committee on Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.
46. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
47. Reich, R.B. 1991. Secession of the successful. New York Times Magazine (January 20): 16-17.
48. Richardson, H.W., and P. Gordon. 1993. Market planning: Oxymoron or common sense? Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (3):347-52.
49. Rittel, H., and M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4 (2):155-69.
50. Rogers, E.M. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
51. Rybczynski, W. 1999. Why we need Olmsted again. Wilson Quarterly 23 (3):15-21.
52. Schmitz, A., P. Engebreston, F. Merrill, S. Peck, R. Santos, K. Shewfelt, D. Stein, J. Torti, and M. Utter. 2003. The new shape of suburbia: Trends in residential development. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
53. Sennett, R. 1977. The fall of public man. New York: Knopf.
54. Smart Growth Network. 2001. Governors on smart growth - 2000. http://www.smartgrowth.org/ (accessed July 24, 2002).
55. Sorkin, M., ed. 1992. Variations on a theme park. New York: Noonday.
56. Sternberg, E. 2000. An integrative theory of urban design. Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (3):265-78.
57. Talen, E., and C. Ellis. 2002. Beyond relativism: Reclaiming the search for good city form. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22:36-49.
58. Tester, K., ed. 1994. The fláneur. New York: Routledge.
59. United States Green Building Council. 2007. LEED for neighborhood development rating system, pilot version. https://www.usgbc.org/ ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2845/ (accessed November 5, 2007).
60. Vanderbeek, M., and C. Irazábal. 2007. Urban design as a catalyst for social change: A comparative look at modernism and new urbanism. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 19 (1):41-57.
61. White, M., and L. White. 1962. The intellectual versus the city: From Thomas Jefferson to Frank Lloyd Wright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and the MIT Press.
62. Wilson, W.H. 1989. The city beautiful movement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.