Impact of technical and morphological factors on the precision of software-based MR tumor volumetry: A phantom study;Einfluss messtechnischer und morphologischer faktoren auf die genauigkeit der softwarebasierten MR-tumorvolumetrie: Eine phantomstudie

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 180, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 654-661

  Rohde, Stefan ^a   Massberg M ^a   Reinhardt, J ^a   Sartor, K ^a   Heiland, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Imaging software; In vitro study; MR imaging; Tumor volume; Volumetric measurements

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ARTICLE; CANCER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; IN VITRO STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR MODEL; TUMOR VOLUME; VOLUMETRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASMS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 49849096190     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027429     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. van den Broek GB, Rasch CR, Pameijer FA et al. Pretreatment probability model for predicting outcome after intraarterial chemoradiation for advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 101: 1809-1817
2. Hermans R. Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome. Cancer Imaging 2006; 6: S145-S153
3. Kurek R, Kalogera-Fountzila A, Muskalla K et al. Usefulness of tumor volumetry as a prognostic factor of survival in head and neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2003; 179: 292-297
4. Rudat V, Dietz A, Schramm O et al. Prognostic impact of total tumor volume and hemoglobin concentration on the outcome of patients with advanced head and neck cancer after concomitant boost radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 1999; 53: 119-125
5. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981; 47: 207-214
6. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205-216
7. Rohde S, Kovacs AF, Berkefeld J et al. Reliability of CT-based tumor volumetry after intraarterial chemotherapy in patients with small carcinoma of the oral cavity and the oropharynx. Neuroradiology 2006; 48: 415-421
8. Rohde S, Turowski B, Berkefeld J et al. CT-based evaluation of tumor volume after intra-arterial chemotherapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the oral cavity: comparison with clinical remission rates. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30: 85-91
9. Whalley HC, Wardlaw JM. Accuracy and reproducibility of simple cross-sectional linear and area measurements of brain structures and their comparison with volume measurements. Neuroradiology 2001; 43: 263-271
10. Bolte H, Riedel C, Knoss N et al. Computertomografiegestützte Lungenrundherdvolumetrie - können optimiert rekonstruierte Routineprotokolle eine vergleichbare Genauigkeit, Reproduzierbarkeit und Interobservervarianz erzielen wie spezielle Volumetrieprotokolle? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 276-281
11. Belge B, Coche E, Pasquet A et al. Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1424-1433
12. Lemke AJ, Kazi I, Hosten N et al. Evaluierung der MR-Volumetrie kleiner Volumina am Beispiel von Augentumoren mittels Phantomuntersuchung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 958-962
13. Sohaib SA, Turner B, Hanson JA et al. CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. The British Journal of Radiology 2000; 73: 1178-1184
14. Werner-Wasik M, Xiao Y, Pequignot E et al. Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT-based study. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2001; 51: 56-61
15. Dempsey MF, Condon BR, Hadley DM. Measurement of tumor "size" in recurrent malignant glioma: 1D, 2D, or 3D? Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 770-776
16. Kimura Y, Sumi M, Ichikawa Y et al. Volumetric MR imaging of oral, maxillary sinus, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers: correlation between tumor volume and lymph node metastasis. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2384-2389
17. Su MY, Yu H, Chiou JY et al. Measurement of volumetric and vascular changes with dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for cancer therapy monitoring. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2002; 1: 479-488
18. Shin KH, Moon SH, Suh JS et al. Tumor volume change as a predictor of chemotherapeutic response in osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 376: 200-208
19. Das M, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Gietema HA et al. Accuracy of automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules across different multislice CT scanners. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1979-1984
20. Honda O, Sumikawa H, Johkoh T et al. Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62: 106-113
21. Shi WM, Wildrick DM, Sawaya R. Volumetric measurement of brain tumors from MR imaging. J Neurooncol 1998; 37: 87-93
22. Chen AC, Sung WH, Wang PH et al. Correlation of three-dimensional tumor volumetry with cervical cancer prognostic parameters. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002; 23: 401-404
23. Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S et al. Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 781-790
24. Alderliesten T, Schlief A, Peterse J et al. Validation of semiautomatic measurement of the extent of breast tumors using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 42-49
25. Rahmouni A, Yang A, Tempany CM et al. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 935-940
26. Frericks BB, Kiene T, Stamm G et al. CT-basierte Lebervolumetrie im Tiermodell: Bedeutung für die klinische Volumetrie im Rahmen der Leberlebendspende. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 252-257
27. Jaffe CC. Measures of response: RECIST, WHO, and new alternatives. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3245-3251
28. Heussel CP, Meier S, Wittelsberger S et al. Quantitative CT-Verlaufskontrolle von Lebermalignomen nach RECIST und WHO im Vergleich zur Volumetrie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 958-964
29. Van Hoe L, Haven F, Bellon E et al. Factors influencing the accuracy of volume measurements in spiral CT: a phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 332-338
30. Tang C, Blatter DD, Parker DL. Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 377-385
31. Disler DG, Marr DS, Rosenthal DI. Accuracy of volume measurements of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging phantoms by three-dimensional reconstruction and preliminary clinical application. Invest Radiol 1994; 29: 739-745
32. Wormanns D. Radiologische Messverfahren zur Beurteilung des Therapieansprechens solider Tumoren. Radiologie up2date 2005; 3: 261-269