Considering patient non-participation in health care

Health Expectations

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 263-271

  Eldh, Ann Catrine ^a,b   Ekman, Inger ^c   Ehnfors, Margareta ^b  

^a FoU Seniorium   (Sweden)

^b ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Concept analysis; Non participation; Patient participation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPEN ENDED QUESTIONNAIRE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOSPITALS, COMMUNITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATION; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC DISORDERS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; SWEDEN;

EID: 49749151040     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00488.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Meleis AI. Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress, 3rd edn. Philadelphia : Lippincott, 2005.
2. Ogden CK, Richards IA. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Orlando, FL : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989.
3. Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing, 3rd edn. Norwalk, CT : Appleton & Lange, 1995.
4. Rothman DJ. The origins and consequences of patient autonomy: a 25-year perspective. Health Care Analysis, 2001 9 : 255 264.
5. Tauber AI. Sick autonomy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2003 46 : 484 495.
6. World Health Organization. A Declaration on the Promotion of Patients' Rights in Europe. Copenhagen : WHO, 1994. Available at: http://www.who.int/ genomics/public/eu_declaration1994.pdf, accessed on 10 August 2006.
7. Wallerstein N. What is the Evidence on Effectiveness of Empowerment to Improve Health? Health Evidence Network Report. Copenhagen : WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2006. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf, accessed on 1 September 2006.
8. Partridge E. Origins. An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, 5th edn. London : Routledge, 1990.
9. Simpson JA, Weiner ESC (eds). The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK : Clarendon, 1989.
10. Coulter A, Magee H (eds). The European Patient of the Future. Maidenhead, UK : Open University Press, 2003.
11. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html, accessed on 20 January 2007.
12. Fergusson R, Manser M, Pickering D (eds). The New Penguin English Thesaurus. London : Penguin Group, 2000.
13. Robinson M, Davidson G (eds). Chambers 21st Century Dictionary, Rev edn. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 1999.
14. National Library of Medicine. MedLine (PubMed). Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=PubMed, accessed on 5 March 2007.
15. Eldh AC, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. The phenomena of participation and non-participation in healthcare: experiences of patients attending a nurse-led clinic for chronic heart failure. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2004 3 : 239 246.
16. Eldh AC, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. The meaning of patient participation for patients and nurses at a nurse-led outpatient clinic for chronic heart failure. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2006 5 : 45 53.
17. Christensen M, Hewitt-Taylor J. Empowerment in nursing: paternalism or maternalism? British Journal of Nursing, 2006 15 : 695 700.
18. Bremberg S, Nilstun T, Kovac V, Zwitter M. GPs facing reluctant and demanding patients: analysing ethical justifications. Family Practice, 2003 20 : 254 261.
19. Eldh AC, Ekman I, Ehnfors M. The concept of patient participation: Patient's descriptions in comparison to health care definitions, in press.
20. Eldh AC, Ekman I, Ehnfors M. Conditions for patient participation and non-participation in health care. Nursing Ethics, 2006 13 : 503 514.
21. Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. ANS Advances in Nursing Science, 1993 16 : 1 8.
22. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 2004 24 : 105 112.
23. Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications and issues. Health Care for Women International, 1992 13 : 313 321.
24. Ricoeur P. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Forth Worth : Texas Christian University Press, 1976.
25. Sandelowski M. Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 2001 24 : 230 240.
26. International Council of Nurses. The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses. Geneva : ICN, 2005. Available at: http://www.icn.ch/icncode.pdf, accessed on 12 March 2007.
27. Barry CA, Stevenson FA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice. Social Science & Medicine, 2001 53 : 487 505.
28. Fossum B, Arborelius E. Patient-centred communication: videotaped consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 2004 54 : 163 169.
29. Street RL, Howard SG, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Medical Care, 2005 43 : 960 969.
30. Ekman I, Swedberg K. Home-based management of patient with chronic heart failure: focus on content not just form!. European Heart Journal, 2002 23 : 1323 1325.
31. Dieppe P, Rafferty A-M, Kitson A. The clinical encounter: the focal point of patient-centred care. Health Expectations, 2002 5 : 279 281.
32. Gillespie R, Florin D, Gillam S. How is patient-centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda? Health Expectations, 2004 7 : 142 149.
33. Ekman I, Boman K, Olofsson M, Aires N, Swedberg K. Gender makes a difference in the description of dyspnoea in patients with chronic heart failure. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2005 4 : 117 121.
34. Ekman I, Cleland JG, Andersson B, Swedberg K. Exploring symptoms in chronic heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure, 2005 7 : 699 703.
35. Mosca L, Appel LJ, Benjamin EJ et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: American Heart Association scientific statement. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2004 24 : 29 50.
36. Nerheim H. Vitenskap og Kommunikasjon. Oslo : Universitetsforlaget, 1996. [In Norwegian]
37. Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Education and Counseling, 2005 57 : 153 157.
38. Parascandola M, Hawkins J, Danis M. Patient autonomy and the challenge of clinical uncertainty. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2002 12 : 245 264.
39. Koehn D. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy. London : Routledge, 1998.
40. General Assembly of the United Nations 1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Available at: http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html, accessed on 15 March 2007.
41. Gillham B. Developing a Questionnaire. London : Continuum, 2000.