Conditions for patient participation and non-participation in health care

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 503-514

  Eldh, Ann Catrine ^a,b   Ekman, Inger ^c   Ehnfors, Margareta ^b  

^a ST GÖRAN S HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Hermeneutic; Non participation; Patient education; Patient participation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE; SWEDEN;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INPATIENTS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SWEDEN;

EID: 33748418868     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: 14770989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733006nej898oa     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Meleis AI. Theoretical nursing: development and progress, third edition. Lippincott, 2005.
2. Rothman DJ. The origins and consequences of patient autonomy: a 25-year perspective. Health Care Anal 2001; 9: 255-64.
3. Tauber AI. Sick autonomy. Perspect Biol Med 2003; 46: 484-95.
4. World Health Organization Regional Committee for Europe. The Copenhagen declaration on health policy, 1994. 1994. Retrieved 10 November, 2005, from: http://www.euro.who.int/AboutWHO/Policy/20021230_2
5. World Health Organization. A declaration on the promotion of patients' rights in Europe. 1994. Retrieved 13 November, 2005, from: http://www.who.int/ genomics/public/eu_declaration1994.pdf
6. International Council of Nurses. The ICN code of ethics for nurses. 2000. Retrieved 11 November, 2005, from: http://www.icn.ch/icncode.pdf
7. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 941-50.
8. Kelly-Powell ML. Personalizing choices: patients' experiences with making treatment decisions. Res Nurs Health 1997; 20: 219-27.
9. Davis RE, Dolan G, Thomas S et al. Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation. Health Expect 2003; 6: 198-207.
10. Ramfeit E, Lützén K. Patients with cancer: their approaches to participating in treatment plan decisions. Nurs Ethics 2005; 12: 143-55.
11. The Oxford English dictionary, second edition. Clarendon Press, 1989.
12. Jewell SE. Patient participation: what does it mean to nurses? J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 433-39.
13. Sahlsten MJ, Larsson IE, Lindencrona CS, Plos KA. Patient participation in nursing care: an interpretation by Swedish registered nurses. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 35-42.
14. Eldh AC, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. The phenomena of participation and non-participation in health care: experiences of patients attending a nurse-led clinic for chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004; 3: 239-46.
15. Eldh AC, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. The meaning of patient participation for patients and nurses at a nurse-led outpatient clinic for chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006; 5: 45-53.
16. Frank AW. The wounded storyteller: body, illness and ethics. University of Chicago Press, 1995.
17. Arnetz JE, Arnetz BB. The development and application of a patient satisfaction measurement system for quality-wide quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 1996; 6: 555-66.
18. Wilde Larsson B, Larsson G. Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. J Clin Nurs 2002; 11: 681-87.
19. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 353-58.
20. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997; 29(3): 21-43.
21. Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1993; 16(2): 1-8.
22. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24: 105-12.
23. Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications and issues. Health Care Women Int 1992; 13: 313-21.
24. Ricoeur P. Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press, 1976.
25. Sandelowski M. Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 2001; 24: 230-40.
26. Parascandola M, Hawkins J, Danis M. Patient autonomy and the challenge of clinical uncertainty. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2002; 12: 245-64.
27. Andersson M. Integritet som begrepp och princip: en studie av ett vårdetiskt ideal i utveckling. (Integrity as a concept and as a principle in health care ethics.) Åbo Academy Press, 1994. (in Swedish).
28. Schattner A, Rudin D, Jellin N. Good physicians from the perspective of their patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2004; 4: 26. Retrieved 8 May, 2006, from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/4/26
29. Joffe S, Manocchia M, Weeks JC, Cleary PD. What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 103-108.
30. Sainio C, Lauri S, Eriksson E. Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making. Nurs Ethics 2001; 8: 97-113.
31. Struhkamp RM. Patient autonomy: a view from the kitchen. Med Health Care Philos 2005; 8: 105-14.
32. Sahlsten M, Larsson I, Plos K, Lindencrona C. Hindrance for patient participation in nursing care. Scand J Caring Sci 2005; 19: 223-29.