Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer;Bildgebung für die brustkrebsfrüherkennung

Deutsches Arzteblatt

Volumn 105, Issue 31-32, 2008, Pages 541-547

  Heywang Köbrunner, Sylvia H ^a   Schreer, Ingrid ^b   Heindel, Walter ^c   Katalinic, Alexander ^d  

^a Referenzzentrum Mammographie München ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Early detection; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography screening; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 49749143314     PISSN: 00121207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0541     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P et al.: Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000; 21: 325-36.
2. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ: Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Roentgenol 2003 Jul; 181: 177-82.
3. Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al.: Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med Torino 2006; 111: 440-8.
4. Honjo S, Ando J, Tsukioka T et al.: Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population : a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2007; 37: 715-20.
5. Kaplan SS: Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221: 641-9.
6. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JC: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-75.
7. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C et al.: Mammography and subsequent whole breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1675-9.
8. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al.: Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. Jama 2008; 299: 2151-63.
9. Hagen AI, Kvistad KA, Maehle L et al.: Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional screening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series. Breast 2007; 16: 367-74.
10. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Peterse H et al.: Tumor characteristics and detection method in the MRISC screening program for the early detection of hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 102: 357-63.
11. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al.: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 8469-76.
12. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK et al.: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005; 365: 1769-78.
13. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G et al.: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 2007; 242: 698-715.
14. Warner E, Causer PA: MRI surveillance for hereditary breast-cancer risk. Lancet 2005; 365: 1747-9.
15. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D et al.: Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92: 9-15.
16. Warner E , Messersmith H, Causer P et al.: Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer: Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 671-9.
17. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA et al.: MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IB-MC 6883. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92: 32-8.
18. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al.: Italian trial for breast MR in multifocal/multicentric cancer. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breast using the whole breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1149-57.
19. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Möhrling D, Nährig J: The Role of MRI before breast conservation. Semin Breast Dis 2007, 10: 137-144.
20. Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid R et al.: High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol 2003 Jan; 76: 3-12.
21. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al.: MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007; 370: 485-92.
22. Welch HG, Black WC: Using autopsy series to estimate the disease "reservoir" for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find? Ann Intern Med 1997 Dec 1; 127: 1023-8.
23. Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K, Breuer P et al.: Outcome of a structured surveillance programme in women with a familial predisposition for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 2006; 15: 483-9.
24. Kaas R, Muller SH, Hart AAM, Rutgers EJT: Stage of breast cancers found during the surveillance of women with a familial or hereditary risk. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34: 501-7.
25. Perlet C, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A: Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 2006; 106: 982-90.