Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): Parameter optimization

Hearing Research

Volumn 243, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 57-68

  Valero, M D ^a   Pasanen, E G ^b   McFadden, D ^b   Ratnam, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; DPOAE; Marmoset; OAE; Parameter optimization; Primary tone frequency ratio; Primary tone level difference; Primate

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON; MALE; MARMOSET; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; CALLITHRIX; CERCOPITHECIDAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 49749137380     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. 1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1996) 3726-3740
2. Allen, J.B., 1990a. User Manual for the CUBDIS Distortion Product Measurement System. AT&T Bell Labs.
3. Allen J.B. Modeling the noise damaged cochlea. In: Dallos P., Geisler C.D., Matthews J.W., Ruggero M.A., and Steele C.R. (Eds). The Mechanics and Biophysics of H earing. Proceedings of a conference held at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 25 - 29 June 1990. (1990), Springer, New York 324-332
4. Barros M., Giorgetti M., Souto A.A., Vilela G., Santos K., Baos N.V., and Tomaz C. Persistent anxiety-like behavior in marmosets following a recent predatory stress condition: reversal by diazepam. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 86 (2007) 705-711
5. Bartlett E.L., and Wang X. Neural representations of temporally modulated signals in the auditory thalamus of awake primates. J. Neurophysiol. 97 (2007) 1005-1017
6. Bendor D., and Wang X. Differential neural coding of acoustic flutter within primate auditory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 10 (2007) 763-771
7. Bowman D.M., Brown D.K., and Kimberley B.P. An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing adults. Hear. Res. 142 (2000) 1-11
8. Brown A.M. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs, and gerbils. Hear. Res. 31 (1987) 25-38
9. Brown A.M., and Gaskill S.A. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 (1990) 840-849
10. Brown A.M., and Gaskill S.A. Can basilar membrane tuning be inferred from distortion measurement?. In: Dallos P., Geisler C.D., Matthews J.W., Ruggero M.A., and Steele C.R. (Eds). The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. Proceedings of a conference held at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 25 - 29 June 1990. (1990), Springer, New York 164-169
11. Brown A.M., Gaskill S.A., Carlyon R.P., and Williams D.M. Acoustic distortion as a measure of frequency selectivity: relation to psychophysical equivalent rectangular bandwidth. J Acoust. Soc. Am. 93 (1993) 3291-3297
12. Brown A.M., Harris F.P., and Beveridge H.A. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1996) 3260-3267
13. 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear. Res. 13 (1984) 29-37
14. Brown A.M., and Kemp D.T. Intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: Could basal vibration be the major cause of round window CM distortion?. Hear. Res. 19 (1985) 191-198
15. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in neonates. Hear. Res. 145 (2000) 17-24
16. Canlon B., Marklund K., and Borg E. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masking tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pigs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94 (1993) 3232-3243
17. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112 (1992) 155-159
18. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in a moth. Hear. Res. 162 (2001) 126-133
19. de la Mothe L.A., Blumell S., Kajikawa Y., and Hackey T.A. Cortical connections of the auditory cortex in marmoset monkeys: core and medial belt regions. J. Comp. Neurol. 496 (2006) 27-71
20. de la Mothe L.A., Blumell S., Kajikawa Y., and Hackey T.A. Thalamic connections of the auditory cortex in marmoset monkeys: core and medial belt regions. J. Comp. Neurol. 496 (2006) 72-96
21. Dreisbach L.E., and Siegel J.H. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 (2001) 2456-2486
22. Dunckley K.T., and Dreisbach L.E. Gender effects on high frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. Ear Hear. 25 (2004) 554-564
23. Fahey P.F., Stagner B.B., and Martin G.K. Mechanism for bandpass frequency characteristic in distortion product otoacoustic emission generation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 991-996
24. 2 from human ears: Relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84 (1988) 215-221
25. 2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 (1990) 821-839
26. 2. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1996) 3268-3274
27. Harel N., Kakigi A., Hirakawa H., Mount R., and Harrison R. The effects of anesthesia on otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. (1997) 25-33
28. 1 ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85 (1989) 220-229
29. 2 otoacoustic emission in humans. H ear. Res. 64 (1992) 133-141
30. Horner K.C., Lenoir M., and Bock G.R. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing-impaired mutant mice. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78 (1985) 1603-1611
31. Kanis L.J., and de Boer E. Frequency dependence of acoustic products in a locally active model of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101 (1997) 1527-1531
32. Kemp D.T., and Brown A.M. A comparison of mechanical nonlinearities of man and gerbil from ear canal measurements. In: Klinke R., and Hartman R. (Eds). Hearing-Physiological Bases and Biophysics (1983), Springer, Berlin 82-88
33. Khvoles R., Freeman S., and Sohmner I. Effect of temperature on the transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rats. Audiol. Neurotol. 6 (1998) 349-360
34. Kim D.O., Molnar C.E., and Matthews J.W. Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67 (1980) 1704-1721
35. Kössl M. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi. Hear. Res. 22 (1994) 105-114
36. Lasky R.E., Snodgrass E.B., Laughlin N.K., and Hecox K.E. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Macaca mulatta and humans. Hear. Res. 89 (1995) 35-51
37. Lasky R.E. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. I. Frequency effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 (1998) 981-991
38. Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K., Probst R., and Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear. Res. 28 (1987) 173-189
39. Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., Scheinin S.A., and Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear. Res. 28 (1987) 191-208
40. Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., and Coats A.C. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions. Hear. Res. 33 (1988) 49-68
41. 2). In: Allen J.B., Hall J.L., Hubbard A., Neely S.T., and Tubis A. (Eds). Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms (1986), Springer, Berlin 258-265
42. 1. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (1999) 3473-3483
43. McFadden D.M., Pasanen E.G., Raper J., Lange H.S., and Wallen K. Sex differences in otoacoustic emissions measured in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Horm. Behav. 50 (2006) 274-284
44. McFadden D.M., Pasanen E.G., Weldele M.L., Glickman S.E., and Place N.J. Masculinized otoacoustic emissions in female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Horm. Behav. 50 (2006) 285-292
45. Meenderink W.F., and van Dijk P. Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens. Hear. Res. 192 (2004) 107-118
46. Mills D.M., and Rubel E.W. Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection. Hear. Res. 77 (1994) 183-199
47. Mills D.M., and Rubel E.W. Development of the cochlear amplifier. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1996) 428-441
48. Moulin A. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 (2000) 1460-1470
49. Neely S.T., and Stover L. Otoacoustic emissions from a nonlinear active model of cochlear mechanics. In: Duifhuis H., Horst J.W., van Dijk P., and van Netten S.M. (Eds). Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems (1993), World Scientific 64-71
50. Neely S.T., and Stover L.J. A generation of distortion products in a model of cochlear mechanics. In: Allen J.B., Hall J.L., Hubbard A., Neely S.T., and Tubis A. (Eds). Diversity in Auditory Mechanics (1997), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY 258-265
51. Nielsen L.H., Popelka G.R., Rasmussen A.N., and Osterhammel P.A. Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand. Audiol. 22 (1993) 159-164
52. Norton S.J., and Rubel E.W. Active and passive components in mammalian and avian ears. In: Dallos P., Geisler C.D., Matthews J.W., Ruggero M.A., and Steele C.R. (Eds). The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing (1990), Springer-Verlag, New York Berlin, Heidelberg 219-226
53. Park J.Y., Clark W.W., Coticchia J.M., and Esselman G.H. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkey ears: normative findings. Hear. Res. 86 (1995) 147-162
54. Parham K. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the C57BL/6J mouse model of age-related hearing loss. Hear. Res. 112 (1997) 216-234
55. Power M.L., Bowman M.E., Smith R., Ziegler T.E., Layne D.G., Schulkin J., and Tardif S.D. Pattern of maternal serum corticotrophin-releasing hormone concentration during pregnancy in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). 68 (2006) 181-188
56. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.K., and Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (1991) 2027-2067
57. Schmiedt R.A. Acoustic distortion products in ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: Effects of acute noise injury. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79 (1986) 1481-1490
58. Schnupp J.W., Hall T.M., Kokelaar R.F., and Ahmed B. Plasticity of temporal pattern codes for vocalization stimuli in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 26 (2006) 4785-4795
59. 2 distortion products assessed by using 2 types of mutant mice. Hear. Res. 52 (1991) 245-254
60. Shera C.A., and Guinan Jr. J.J. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105 (1999) 782-798
61. Sieden, H.R., 1957. Auditory acuity of the marmoset monkey, Hapale jacchus. Thesis, Princeton University.
62. Smurzynski J., Leonard G., Kim D.O., Lafreniere D.C., and Jung M.D. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. Arch. Otolaryngol. H ead. Neck. Surg. 116 (1990) 1309-1316
63. 2 distortion product oto-acoustic emissions in dogs: preliminary findings. Audiol. Neurootol. 3 (1998) 313-385
64. Spatz W.B. Unipolar brush cells in the cochlear nuclei of a primate (Callithrix jacchus). Neurosci. Lett. 270 (1999) 141-144
65. Spatz W.B., and Löhle E. Calcium-binding proteins in the spiral ganglion of the monkey, Callithrix jacchus. Hear. Res. 86 (1995) 89-99
66. Stover L., Neely S.T., and Gorga M.P. Explorations of the 'filter' of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Abstr. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 17 (1994) 54
67. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A., and Dhar S. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105 (1999) 275-292
68. Tardif S.D., Ziegler T.E., Power M., and Layne D.G. Endocrine changes in full-term pregnancies and pregnancy loss due to energy restriction in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90 (2005) 335-339
69. van Hengel P.W.J., and Duifhuis H. The generation of distortion products in a nonlinear transmission line model of the cochlea. In: Wada H., Takasaka T., Ikeda K., Ohyama K., and Koike T. (Eds). Recent Developments in Auditory Mechanics (2000), World Scientific, Singapore 409-415
70. Varghese G.I., Zhu X., and Frisina R.D. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice. Hear. Res. 209 (2005) 60-67
71. Vassilakis P.N., Meenderink S.W.F., and Narins P.M. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues to hearing mechanisms in the frog ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2004) 3713-3726
72. Wever E.G., and Vernon J.A. Cochlear potentials in the marmoset. Physiology 47 (1961) 739-741
73. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91 (1992) 1587-1607
74. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II. Differential physiological vulnerability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91 (1992) 1587-1607
75. 1. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 (1995) 2346-2358
76. 2 cochlear emissions at all levels in the cat. In: Allen J.B., Hall J.L., Hubbard A., Neely S.T., and Tubis A. (Eds). Peripheral Auditory Mechanism (1986), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY 322-329
77. 2, in psychophysics and ear-canal recording. In: van den Brink G., and Bilsen F.A. (Eds). Psychophysical, physiological and behavioural studies in hearing (1980), Delft Univ. Press, Delft, Netherlands 4350
78. Zurek P.M., Clark W.W., and Kim D.O. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72 (1982) 774-780