Transient-evoked and 2F1-F2 distortion product oto-acoustic emissions in dogs: Preliminary findings

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 373-385

  Sockalingam, Ravi ^a   Filippich, Lucio ^a   Sommerlad, Sue ^a   Murdoch, Bruce ^a   Charles, Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Animal model; Dog; Oto acoustic emission; Transient evoked distortion product

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; COCHLEA; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; DOG; ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HAIR CELL; HEARING ACUITY; MALE; NONHUMAN; OTOSCOPY; OTOTOXICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TYMPANOMETRY; ANIMAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; DOGS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0031595794     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000013807     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, Elbez M, Erming M: Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97: 3012-3020.
2. Avan P, Loth D, Menguy C, Teysou M: Evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig: Basic characteristics. Hear Res 1990;44:151-160.
3. Balkany T, Telichi F, McCoy M, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G: Otoacoustic emissions in otologic practice. Am J Otol 1994;15(suppl 1): 29-38.
4. Bonfils P, Uziel A: Clinical applications of evoked-otoacoustic emissions: Results in normally hearing and hearing impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:326-331.
5. Bray P, Kemp D: An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987;21:191-204.
6. Brown AM: Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hear Res 1987;31:25-38.
7. Brownell W: Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;11:82-92.
8. Burkard R, Salvi R, Chen L: 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in white leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): Effects of frequency ratio and relative level. Audiol Neurootol 1996;1:197-213.
9. 2 acoustic distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear Res 1991;13: 185-208.
10. Harris FP: Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33: 594-600.
11. 1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:220-229.
12. Harris FP, Probst R: Reporting click-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1991;12:399-405.
13. Hilger A, Furness D, Wilson J: The possible relationship between transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and organ of Corti irregularities in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1995;84:1-11.
14. Kemp D: Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64: 1386-1391.
15. Kemp D, Ryan S: The use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening programs. Semin Hear 1993;14:30-45.
16. Khvoles R, Freeman S, Sohmer H: Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat. Hear Res 1996;97:120-126.
17. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK: The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;11:90-99.
18. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Coats AC, Martin GK: Acoustic distortion products in rabbits. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear Res 1987;28:173-189.
19. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Whitehead ML, Martin GK: Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears: Insight and generation processes; in Allum JHJ, Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, Harris FP, Probst R (eds): Progress in Brain Research. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1993, vol 97, pp 77-90.
20. Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Coats AC: Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a non-human primate: Basic features and relationship to other emissions. Hear Res 1988;33:49-68.
21. Mills DM, Rubel EW: Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection. Hear Res 1994;77:183-199.
22. Munro KJ, Cox CL: Investigation of hearing impairment in Cavalier King Charles spaniels using auditory brainstem response audiometry. J Small Anim Pract 1997;38:2-5.
23. Munro KJ, Shiu JN, Cox CL: The effect of the head size on the auditory brainstem response for two breeds of dogs. Br J Audiol 1997;31:309-314.
24. Nelson D, Kimberley B: Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:1142-1159.
25. Norton SJ, Bargones J, Rubel EW: Development of otoacoustic emissions in gerbil: Evidence for micromechanical changes underlying development of the place code. Hear Res 1991;51:73-92.
26. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK: A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;89: 2027-2067.
27. Reshef I, Attias J, Furst M: Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1993;27:387-395.
28. Robinette M: Clinical observations with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with adults. Semin Hear 1992; 13:23-35.
29. Sims M, Robert R, James T: Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in dogs. J Vet Neurol 1994;5:49-56.
30. Ueda H, Hattori T, Sawaki M, Niwa H, Yanagita N: The effect of furosemide on evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear Res 1992; 62:199-205.
31. 2 in rabbits; in Dallos P, Geisler D, Matthews J, Ruggero M, Steele C (eds): Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. New York, Springer, 1990, pp 243-250.
32. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK: Relevance of animal models to the clinical application of otoacoustic emissions. Semin Hear 1992;13:81-101.
33. 2 cochlear emissions at all levels in the cat; in Allen J, Hall J, Hubbard A, Neely S, Tubis A (eds): Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms. Berlin, Springer, 1986, pp 322-329.
34. Wilson J: Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate. Hear Res 1980;2: 527-532.
35. Wit H, Kahman H: Frequency analysis of stimulated cochlear acoustic emissions in monkey ears. Hear Res 1982;8:1-11.
36. Zheng X-Y, Wang J, Salvi R, Henderson D: Effects of kainic acid on the cochlear potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla. Hear Res 1996;95:161-167.
37. Zurek P, Clark W, Kim D: The behaviour of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:774-780.