Active Annotation

EACL 2006 - 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining, ATEM 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 64-71

  Vlachos, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; REUSABILITY; SUPERVISED LEARNING; TEXT PROCESSING;

ACTIVE LEARNING; BIOMEDICAL DOMAIN; HIDDEN-MARKOV MODELS; LEARNING FRAMEWORKS; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING; TRAINING MATERIAL; UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION; UNSUPERVISED METHOD;

HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS;

EID: 49749110541     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. J. Baldridge and M. Osborne. 2004. Active learning and the total cost of annotation. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, Barcelona, Spain.
2. M. Becker, B. Hachey, B. Alex, and C. Grover. 2005. Optimising selective sampling for bootstrapping named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Learning with Multiple Views, ICML.
3. D. A. Cohn, Z. Ghahramani, and M. I. Jordan. 1995. Active learning with statistical models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 7.
4. M. Collins and Y. Singer. 1999. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on EMNLP and VLC.
5. Aron Culotta and Andrew McCallum. 2004. Confidence estimation for information extraction. In Proceedings of HLT 2004, Boston, MA.
6. M. Dickinson andW. D.Meurers. 2003. Detecting errors in part-of-speech annotation. In Proceedings of EACL 2003, pages 107-114, Budapest, Hungary.
7. S. Dingare, J. Finkel, M. Nissim, C. Manning, and C. Grover. 2004. A system for identifying named entities in biomedical text: How results from two evaluations reflect on both the system and the evaluations. In The 2004 BioLink meeting at ISMB.
8. J. D. Kim, T. Ohta, Y. Tateisi, and J. Tsujii. 2003. Genia corpus - a semantically annotated corpus for biotextmining. In ISMB (Supplement of Bioinformatics).
9. J. Kim, T. Ohta, Y. Tsuruoka, Y. Tateisi, and N. Collier, editors. 2004. Proceedings of JNLPBA, Geneva.
10. A. Morgan, L. Hirschman, A. Yeh, and M. Colosimo. 2003. Gene name extraction using FlyBase resources. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Workshop on NLP in Biomedicine, pages 1-8.
11. T. Nakagawa and Y. Matsumoto. 2002. Detecting errors in corpora using support vector machines. In Proceedings of COLING 2002.
12. M. Osborne. 2002. Shallow parsing using noisy and non-stationary training material. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2:695-719.
13. D. Pierce and C. Cardie. 2001. Limitations of co-training for natural language learning from large datasets. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2001, pages 1-9.
14. T. Scheffer, C. Decomain, and S. Wrobel. 2001. Active hiddenMarkov models for information extraction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2189:309+.
15. H. S. Seung, M. Opper, and H. Sompolinsky. 1992. Query by committee. In Proceedings of COLT 1992.
16. D. Shen, J. Zhang, J. Su, G. Zhou, and C. L. Tan. 2004. Multi-criteria-based active learning for named entity recongition. In Proceedings of ACL 2004, Barcelona.
17. J. Sjöbergh and O. Knutsson. 2005. Faking errors to avoid making errors: Machine learning for error detection in writing. In Proceedings of RANLP 2005