Detecting errors in part-of-speech annotation

10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 107-114

  Dickinson, Markus ^a   Meurers, W Detmar ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CLASS ANALYSIS; CLOSED CLASS; FINITE-STATE; GOLD STANDARDS; GUIDE PATTERNS; HIGH-PRECISION; N-GRAMS; PART OF SPEECH; TREEBANKS; WALL STREET JOURNAL;

ERROR DETECTION;

EID: 85054452952     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Steven Abney, Robert E. Schapire and Yoram Singer, 1999. Boosting Applied to Tagging and PP Attachment. In Pascale Fung and Joe Zhou (eds.), Proceedings of Joint EMNLP and Very Large Corpora Conference. pp. 38-45.
2. Rakesh Agrawal and Ramakrishnan Srikant, 1994. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases. In Jorge B. Bocca, Matthias Jarke and Carlo Zaniolo (eds.), VLDB'94. Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 487-499.
3. John Paul Baker, 1997. Consistency and accuracy in correcting automatically tagged data. In Garside et al. (1997), pp. 243-250.
4. Thorsten Brants, 2000. Inter-Annotator Agreement for a German Newspaper Corpus. In Proceedings of LREC. Athens, Greece.
5. Eleazar Eskin, 2000. Automatic Corpus Correction with Anomaly Detection. In Proceedings of NAACL. Seattle, Washington.
6. Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech and Tony McEnery (eds.), 1997. Corpus annotation: linguistic information from computer text corpora. Longman, London and New York.
7. Hideki Hirakawa, Kenji Ono and Yumiko Yoshimura, 2000. Automatic Refinement of a POS Tagger Using a Reliable Parser and Plain Text Corpora. In Proceedings of COLING. Saarbriicken, Germany.
8. Pavel KvétOn and Karel Oliva, 2002. Achieving an Almost Correct P05-Tagged Corpus. In Petr Sojka, Ivan Kopeèek and Karel Pala (eds.), Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD). Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 19-26.
9. Geoffrey Leech, 1997. A Brief Users' Guide to the Grammatical Tagging of the British National Corpus. UCREL, Lancaster University.
10. Geoffrey Leech, Roger Garside and Michael Bryant, 1994. CLAWS4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. In Proceedings of COLING. Kyoto, Japan, pp. 622-628.
11. M. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini and M. A. Marcinkiewicz, 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
12. Frank H. Muller and Tylman Ule, 2002. Annotating topological fields and chunks - and revising POS tags at the same time. In Proceedings of COLING. Taipei, Taiwan.
13. Karel Oliva, 2001. The Possibilities of Automatic Detection/Correction of Errors in Tagged Corpora: A Pilot Study on a German Corpus. In Vdclav Matougek, Pavel Mautner, Roman Mou6ek and Karel Tauger (eds.), Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD). Springer, pp. 39-46.
14. Adwait Ratnaparkhi, 1996. A maximum entropy model part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Philadelphia, PA, pp. 133-141.
15. Beatrice Santorini, 1990. Part-Of-Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project (3rd revision, 2nd printing). Ms., Department of Linguistics, UPenn. Philadelphia, PA.
16. John M. Sinclair, 1992. The automatic analysis of corpora. In Jan Svartvik (ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, NY, pp. 379-397.
17. Wojciech Skut, Brigitte Krenn, Thorsten Brants and Hans Uszkoreit, 1997. An Annotation Scheme for Free Word Order Languages. In Proceedings of ANLP. Washington, D.C.
18. Hans van Halteren, 2000. The Detection of Inconsistency in Manually Tagged Text. In Anne Abeille, Thorsten Brants and Hans Uszkoreit (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora. Luxembourg.
19. Atro Voutilainen and Timo Jarvinen, 1995. Specifying a shallow grammatical representation for parsing purposes. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the EACL. Dublin, Ireland.