Cadence, age, and weight as determinants of forefoot plantar pressures using the Biofoot in-shoe system

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 302-310

  Martínez Nova, Alfonso ^a   Huerta, Javier Pascual ^b   Sánchez Rodríguez, Raquel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49749102410     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/0980302     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BOOYA F, BANDARIAN F, LARIJANI B, ET AL: Potential risk factors for diabetic neuropathy: a case control study. BMC Neurol 5: 24, 2005.
2. ROZEMA A, ULBRECHT J, PAMMER S, ET AL: In shoe plantar pressures during activities of daily living: implications for therapeutic footwear design. Foot Ankle Int 17: 352, 1996.
3. BRANTHWAITE HR, PAYTON CJ, CHOCKALINGAM N: The effect of simple insoles on three-dimensional foot motion during normal walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19: 972, 2004.
4. BRYANT A, TINLEY P, SINGER K: Plantar pressure distribution in normal, hallux valgus and hallux limitus feet. The Foot 9: 115, 1999.
5. BRYANT AR, TINLEY P, SINGER KP: Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system. JAPMA 90: 295, 2000.
6. CAVANAGH PR, MORAG E, BOULTON AJM, ET AL: The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech 30: 243, 1997.
7. MORAG E, CAVANAGH PR: Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking. J Biomech 32: 359, 1999.
8. MUELLER MJ, HASTINGS M, COMMEAN PK, ET AL: Forefoot structural predictors of plantar pressures during walking in people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. J Biomech 36: 1009, 2003.
9. PAYNE C, TURNER D, MILLER K: Determinants of plantar pressures in the diabetic foot. J Diabetes Complications 16: 277, 2002.
10. MENZ HB, MORRIS ME: Clinical determinants of plantar forces and pressures during walking in older people. Gait Posture 24: 229, 2006.
11. HESSERT MJ, VYAS M, LEACH J, ET AL: Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and old adults. BMC Geriatr 5: 8, 2005.
12. PLANCK MJ: The pattern of forefoot pressure distribution in hallux valgus. The Foot 5: 8, 1995.
13. STEBBINS JA, HARRINGTON ME, GIACOMOZZI C, ET AL: Assessment of sub-division of plantar pressure measurement in children. Gait Posture 22: 372, 2005.
14. CAVANAGH PR, RODGERS MM, IIBOSHI A: Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle 5: 262, 1987.
15. LUGER EJ, NISSAN M, KARPF A, ET AL: Patterns of weight distribution under metatarsal heads. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81: 199, 1999.
16. SCOTT G, MENZ HB, NEWCOMBE L: Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture 26: 68, 2007.
17. HILLS AP, HENNING EM, MCDONALD M, ET AL: Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Obes 25: 1674, 2001.
18. CLARKE TE, CAVANAGH P: Pressure distribution under the foot during barefoot walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 13: 135, 1981.
19. CAVANAGH PR, SIMS DS, SANDERS LJ: Body mass is a poor predictor of peak plantar pressures in diabetic men. Diabetes Care 14: 750, 1991.
20. BIRTANE M, TUNA H: The evaluation of plantar pressure distribution in obese and non-obese adults. Clin Biomech 19: 1055, 2004.
21. ROSENBAUM D, HAUTMANN S, GOLD M, ET AL: Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion. Gait Posture 2: 191, 1994.
22. BURNFIELD JM, FEW CD, MOHAMED OS, ET AL: The influence of walking speed on footwear on plantar pressures in older adults. Clin Biomech 19: 78, 2004.
23. ZZHU H, WERTSCH JJ, HARRIS GF, ET AL: Walking cadence effect on plantar pressures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76: 1000, 1995.
24. FORNER A, GARCIA AC, ALCANTARA E, ET AL: Properties of shoe insert materials related to shock wave transmission during gait. Foot Ankle Int 16: 778, 1995.
25. SÁNCHEZ-RODRÍGUEZ R, MARTÍ NEZ-NOVA A, QUEROL-MAHTÍNEZ E, ET AL: Estudio comparativo del diseño de cuatro tratamientos ortopodológicos para la descarga de la segunda cabeza metatarsal. Rev Esp Podol 17: 146, 2006.
26. LAFUENTE R, DOÑATE JJ, POVEDA R, ET AL: Valoración evolutiva de fracturas de calcáneo mediante el análisis biomecánico de la marcha: análisis de resultados. Mapfre Medicina 13: 275, 2002.
27. ORLIN MN, MCPOIL TG: Plantar pressure assessment. Phys Ther 80: 399, 2000.
28. HUGHES J, PRATT L, LINGE K, ET AL: Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech 6: 14, 1991.
29. VANZANT RS, MCPOIL TG, CORNWALL MW: Symmetry of plantar pressures and vertical forces in healthy subjects during walking. JAPMA 91: 337, 2001.
30. BARNETT S, CUNNINGHAM JL, WEST S: A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an inshoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 16: 353, 2001.
31. HURKMANS H, BUSSMANN J, BENDA E, ET AL: Accuracy and repeatability of the Pedar Mobile system in long-term vertical force measurements. Gait Posture 23: 118, 2006.
32. QUESADA PM, RASH GS, JARBOE N: Assessment of Pedar and F-Scan revisited. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 12: S15, 1997.
33. PORTNEY LG, WATKINS MP: "Statistical Measures of Reliability," in Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, p505, Appleton & Lange, East Norwalk, CT, 1993.
34. MURPHY DF, BEYNNON BD, MICHELSON JD, ET AL: Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure. Foot Ankle Int 26: 171, 2005.
35. DE COCK A, WILLEMS T, WITVROUW E, ET AL: A functional foot type classification with cluster analysis based on plantar pressure distribution during jogging. Gait Posture 23: 339, 2003.
36. MOHAMED O, CERNY K, JONES W, ET AL: The effect of terrain on foot pressures during walking. Foot Ankle Int 26: 859, 2005.
37. BURGER ES: The measurement of the static forces at the weight bearing points of the feet with reference to critical heel heights and "split heel" factors. Chir Rec 35: 1, 1952.
38. DAENTZER D, WULKER N, ZIMMERMANN U: Observations concerning the transverse metatarsal arch. Foot Ankle Surg 3: 15, 1997.
39. NIGG BM: The role of impact forces and foot pronation: a new paradigm. Clin J Sport Med 11: 2, 2001.
40. NIGG BM, WAKELING JM: Impact forces and muscle tuning: a new paradigm. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 29: 37, 2001.
41. BOYER KA, NIGG BM: Muscle activity in the leg is tuned in response to impact force characteristics. J Biomech 37: 1583, 2004.
42. WAKELING JM, VON TSCHARNER V, NIGG BM, ET AL: Muscle activity in the leg is tuned in response to ground reaction forces. J Appl Physiol 91: 1307, 2001.
43. SARNOW MR, VEVES A, GIURINI JM, ET AL: In-shoe pressure measurements in diabetics with at-risk feet and in healthy subjects. Diabetes Care 17: 1002, 1994.
44. MENZ HB: Two feet, or one person? problems associated with statistical analysis of paired data in foot and ankle medicine. The Foot 14: 2, 2004.