Is computer-generated interactive mathematics homework more effective than traditional instructor-graded homework?

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 928-932

  Kodippili, Asitha ^a   Senaratne, Deepthika ^b  

^a FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; COURSE DESIGN; MULTIMEDIA INSTRUCTIONS; ON-LINE HOMEWORKS;

STUDENTS;

CURRICULA;

EID: 49749092726     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00794.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 223 234.
2. Cooper, H. (1989). Synthesis of research on home work. Educational Leadership, 47, 85 91.
3. Doyle, M. E. Barber, B. S. (1990). Homework as a learning experience (3rd ed Washington, DC : National Education Association.
4. Hong, E. Milgram, R. M. (1999). Preferred and actual homework style: a cross cultural examination. Educational Research, 41, 3, 251 265.
5. Malanie, H., Diana, S. T., Bronwen, S., Kenneth, T. John, T. (2004). Computer or paper? That is the question: does the medium in which assessment questions are presented affect children performance in mathematics? Educational Research, 46, 1, 29 42.
6. Marcy, P. D. (2001). Computers for what? Examining the roles of technology in teaching and learning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 2 3, 335 349.
7. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : NCATE.
8. Qing, L. (2005). Infusing technology into a mathematics methods course: any impact? Educational Research, 47, 2, 217 233.
9. Walberg, H. J. (1985). Homework: powerful effect on learning. Educational Leadership, 42, 76 79.