Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization: Toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 35, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 102-112

  Tennis, Joseph T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49749091621     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-102     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 1969. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
2. Bates, Marcia, J. 2005. An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models, In Fisher, Karen.E., Erdelez, Sandra and McKechnie, Lynne, eds. Theories of information behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 1-24.
3. Bates, Marcia. J. 1994. The design of databases and other information resources for humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project report no. 4. Online and CD-ROM review 18 no. 6: 331-340.
4. Beghtol, Clare. 2003. Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationships between "professional" and "naïve" classifications. Knowledge organization 30 no. 2: 64-73.
5. Beghtol, Clare. 2002. A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems. Journal of documentation 58 no. 5: 507-532.
6. Beghtol, Clare. 1986. Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of documentation 42 no. 2: 84-113.
7. Bliss Classification Association. 2007. The Bliss Bibliographic Classification: history & description. Available at http://www. blissclassification.org.uk/bchist.htm
8. Bowker, Geoffrey C. 2005. Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
9. Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
10. Broadfield, A. 1946. Philosophy of classification. London: Grafton.
11. Campbell, D. Grant. 2006. A phenomenological framework for the relationship between the semantic web and user-centered tagging systems. In Fumer, Jonathan and Tennis, Joseph T., eds. Proceedings 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research 17, Austin, Texas Available at http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1838/.
12. Carlyle, Allyson. 1989. Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog. Cataloging & classification quarterly 10: 37-63.
13. Daly, Mary in cahoots with Jane Caputi. 1987. Websters' first new intergalactic wickedary of the English language. Boston: Beacon Press.
14. Day, Ronald. 2001 Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management through European documentation, critical modernity, and Post-Fordism. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 5 no. 29: 725-735.
15. Feinberg, Melanie. 2006. An examination of authority in social classification systems. In Furner, Jonathan and Tennis, Joseph T. eds. Proceedings 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research 17, Austin, Texas. Available at list.sir.arizona.edu/1783/01/feinberg.pdf
16. Fidel, Raya. 1994. User-centered indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 no. 8: 572-578.
17. Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Quoted in Mai 2002.
18. Frohmann, B. 1990. Rules of indexing: a critique of mentalism in information retrieval theory. Journal of documentation 46 no. 2: 81-101.
19. Furner, Jonathan. 2007. Dewey deracialized: a critical race-theoretic perspective. Knowledge organization 34 no. 3: 144-168.
20. Furner, Jonathan. 2002. Shera's social epistemology recast as psychological bibliology. Social epistemology 16: 5-22.
21. Gene Ontology. 2008. Available at http://www.geneontology.org/
22. Gnoli, Claudio and Poli, Roberto. 2004. Levels of reality and levels of representation. Knowledge organization 31 no. 3: 151-160.
23. Hjørland, Birger. 1998. Theory and metatheory of Information Science: a new interpretation. Journal of documentation 54 no. 5: 606-621.
24. Hjorland, Birger. 2004. Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science. Library trends 52 no. 3: 488-506.
25. Jeng, L. H. 1996. Using verbal reports to understand cataloging expertise: two cases. Library resources and technical services 40: 343-358.
26. Kipp, Margaret E.I. and Campbell, D. Grant. 2006. Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: an examination of tagging practices. Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, November 3-8, 2006. Available at http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1704/
27. Korotkin, Arthur L. et al. 1965. Indexing aids, procedures, and devices. Rome Air Development Center Report RADC-TR-64-582. Available from C.F.S.T. I. as AD 616342.
28. Krarup, Karl and Boserup, Ivan. 1982. Reader-oriented indexing. Part of the series, Automation and Documentation Pamphlets Edited by the Royal Library vol. 2. Royal Library, Copenhagen.
29. Langridge, Derek Wilton. 1989. Subject analysis: principles and procedures. London: Bowker Saur.
30. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2002. Is classification theory possible? Rethinking classification research. In López-Huertas, María J., ed., Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference 10-13 July 2002 Granada. Würzburg: Ergon, 472-78.
31. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2001. Semiotics and indexing: an analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of documentation 57 no. 5: 591-622.
32. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2000. The subject indexing process: an investigation into the problems in knowledge representation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
33. Negri, Antonio. 1988. Archaeology and project: The mass worker and the social worker. Revolution retrieved: selected writings on Marx, Keynes, Capitalist crisis and new social subjects. London: Red Notes: 203-228.
34. Negri, Antonio. 1999. Value and affect. Boundary 2 no. 26: 77-88.
35. Negri, Antonio. 2000. Kairòs, alma Venus, multitudo: nove lezioni impartite a me stesso. Rome: Manifestolibri.
36. Oliver, Lawrence H. 1966. An investigation of the basic processes involved in the manual indexing of scientific documents. Bethesda, MD: General Electric Company. NSF C-422 [PB 169 415].
37. Olson, Hope A. 2002. The power to name: locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
38. Ranganathan, Shiyali Ramamrita. 1967. Prolegomena to library classification. 3rd ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
39. Reynolds, Paul D. 1971. A primer in theory construction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
40. Richardson, Laurel. 2004. Writing as a method of inquiry. In Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy and Leavy, Patricia eds., Approaches to qualitative research: a reader on theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Ritzer, George. 1991a. Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
42. Ritzer, George. 1991b. Reflections on the rise of metatheorizing in sociology. Sociological perspectives 34 no. 3: 237-248.
43. Rorty, Richard. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin Books.
44. Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45. Sandstrom, A. R. and Sandstrom, P. E. 1995. The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research. Library quarterly 65 no. 2: 161-199.
46. Šauperl, Alenka. 1999. Subject indication during the cataloging process. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
47. Šauperl, Alenka. 2002. Subject determination during the cataloging process. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
48. Šauperl, Alenka. 2004. Cataloger's common ground and shared knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55 no. 1: 55-63.
49. Smith, Barry. 2005. From concepts to clinical reality: an essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies. Journal of biomedical informatics 39: 288-298.
50. Soergel, Dagobert. 1974. Indexing languages and thesauri: construction and maintenance. Los Angeles: Melville.
51. Sonesson, G. 1998a. Icon. In Bouissac, Paul ed. Encyclopedia of semiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Sonesson, G. 1998b. Index. In Bouissac, Paul ed. Encyclopedia of semiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Tennis, Joseph T. 2006. Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks. In Budin, Gerhard, Swertz, Christian, and Mitgutsch, Konstantin eds., Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the Ninth International ISKO Conference 4-7 July 2006 Vienna. Würzburg: Ergon, 303-310.
54. Wilson, Patrick. 1983. Second-hand knowledge: an inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
55. Wilson, Patrick. 1968. Two kinds of power: an essay in bibliographical control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.