Applications of meta-models in finite element based reliability analysis of engineering structures

CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 161-184

  Panda, S S ^a   Manohar, C S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURE; AIRFRAMES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RANDOM VARIABLES; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SCHRODINGER EQUATION; STATIC ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY;

AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES; APPROXIMATE PROCEDURES; ENGINEERING STRUCTURES; EXTREME VALUES; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT MODEL; ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES; KRIGING MODELS; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; META-MODELS; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS; PERFORMANCE FUNCTIONS; RELIABILITY CALCULATIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS; SPACE-FILLING; SURROGATE MODELING;

RELIABILITY;

EID: 49749086194     PISSN: 15261492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ang, A. H-S.; Tang, W.H. (1984): Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, vol. 3, Decision, Risk and Reliability, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2. Audze, P.; Eglais, V. (1977): New approach for planning out of experiments, Problems of Dynamics and Strengths; 35, 104-107. Zinatne Publishing House.
3. Bates, S.J.; Sienz, J.; Langley, D.S. (2003): Formulation of the Audze-Eglais uniform Latin hypercube design of experiments, Advances in Engineering Software, 34(8), 493-506.
4. Breitung, K.; Faravelli, L. (1996): Chapter 5: Response surface methods and asymptotic approximations. In Casciati, F. and Roberts, J.B., editors, Mathematical models for structural reliability analysis. CRC Press, New York.
5. Bucher, C.G.; Bourgund, U. (1990): A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems, Structural Safety, 7, 57-66.
6. Coles, S. (2001): An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer Verlag
7. Castillo, E. (1988): Extreme Value Theory in Engineering, Academic Press.
8. Faravelli, L. (1992): Structural reliability via response surface. In: Bellomo N, Casciati F, editors. Proc of IUTAM symposium on nonlinear stochastic mechanics. Springer Verlag; 213-23.
9. Faravelli, L. (1998): Response surface approach for reliability analysis. J Eng Mechanics, ASCE; 115(12), 2763-81.
10. Gupta Sayan (2004): Reliability Analysis of Randomly Vibrating Structures with Parameter Uncertainties, Doctoral Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
11. Gupta Sayan; Manohar C.S. (2004a): Response surface method for time variant reliability analysis of nonlinear random structures under nonstationary excitations, Nonlinear Dynamics, 36, 267-280.
12. Gupta Sayan; Manohar C.S. (2004b): Improved response surface method for structural reliability analysis, Structural safety, 123-139.
13. Haldar, A.; Mahadevan, S. (2000): Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
14. Helton, J.C.; Johnson, J.D.; Sallaberry, C.J.; Storlie, C.B. (2006): Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(10-11), 175-1209.
15. Huh, J.; Haldar, A. (2002): Seismic reliability of non-linear frames with PR connections using systematic RSM, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 17, 177-190.
16. Kaymaz, I. (2005): Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems, Structural Safety, 27, 133-151.
17. Kaymaz, I.; McMahon, C.A. (2005): A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 20, 11-17.
18. Khuri, A.I.; Cornell, J.A. (1997) Response surfaces: design and analyses. New York: Marcel and Dekker.
19. Kim, S.-H., Na, S.-W. (1997): Response surface method using vector projected sampling points. Structural Safety, 19(1), 3-19.
20. Kotz, S.; Nadarajah, S. (2000): Extreme Value Distributions. Imperial College Press, London.
21. Lee, J.B.; Jai Hak Park; Sung Ho Lee; Hong-Deok Kim; Han-Sub Chung (2006): Prediction of Crack Growth in Steam Generator Tubes Using Monte Carlo Simulation, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 11(1), 9-16.
22. Liou, W. W.; Fang, Y.C. (2000): Implicit Boundary Conditions for Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Method in MEMS Flow Predictions, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 1, 119-128.
23. Liu, Y.W.; Moses, F. (1994): A sequential response surface method and its application in the reliability analysis of aircraft structural systems. Structural Safety, 16, 39-46.
24. Lophaven, S N.; Nielsen, H.B.; Sndergaard, J. (2002): DACE - A Matlab kriging toolbox, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, DTU.
25. Liefvendahl, M.; Stocki, R. (2006): A study on algorithms for optimization of Latin hypercubes, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136, 3231-3247.
26. Manohar, C.S.; Ibrahim, R.A. (1999): Progress in structural dynamics with stochastic parameter variations 1987-1998, ASME Applied Mechanics Reviews, 52(5), 177-197.
27. Manohar, C.S.; Sayan Gupta (2005), Modeling and evaluation of structural reliability: current status and future directions, in Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Edited by K S Jagadish and R N Iyengar, University Press, Hyderabad, pp. 90-187.
28. Melchers, R.E. (1999): Structural reliability analysis and prediction, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
29. Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C. (1995): Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
30. Papoulis, A.; Pillai, S.U. (2002): Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic processes, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 146-147.
31. Sundararajan, C.R. (1995): Probabilistic structural mechanics handbook, Chapman and Hall, New York.
32. Rackwitz, R. (2001): Reliability analysis-a review and some perspectives, Structural Safety, 23, 365-395.
33. Radhika, B.; Panda, S.S.; Manohar, C.S. (2007): Time variant reliability analysis of non-linear structural dynamical systems using combined Monte Carlo simulations and asymptotic extreme value theory, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, to be submitted.
34. Rajashekhar, M.R.; Ellingwood, B.R. (1993): A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Structural Safety, 12, 205-20.
35. Sacks, J.; Welch, W.J.; Mitchell, T.J.; Wynn, H.P. (1989): Design and Analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science, 4, 409-435.
36. Santner, T.J.; Williams, B.H.; Notz W.I. (2003): The design and analysis of computer experiments, Springer, New York.
37. Schueller, G.I.; Pradlwarter, H.J. (2007), Benchmark study on reliability estimation in higher dimensions of structural systems-an overview, 2007, Structural Safety, 29, 167-182.
38. Schueller, G.I.(Ed) (1997): A state-of-the-art report on computational stochastic mechanics, Probabilistic Engineering mechanics, 12(4), 197-321.
39. Sudret, B.; Der Kiureghian, A. (2002): Comparison of finite element reliability methods, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 17, 337-348.
40. Wong, F.S. (1984): Uncertainties in dynamic soil structure interaction. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 110(2), 308-324
41. Wong, F.S. (1985): Slope stability and response surface method. Journal of geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 111(1), 32-53.
42. Xu, C;Jia, X.; Williams, R. A.; Stitt, E.H.; Nijemeisland, M.; El-Bachir, S.; Sederman, A. J.; Gladden, L.F. (2008): Property Predictions for Packed Columns Using Monte Carlo and Discrete Element Digital Packing Algorithms. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 23(2), 117-126.