Individualism, masculinity, and the sources of organizational commitment

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 599-617

  Gelade, Garry A ^a   Dobson, Paul ^a   Auer, Katharina ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Shell International BV

Author keywords

Cultural values; Individualism; Masculinity; Organizational commitment

Indexed keywords

EID: 49649129910     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: 15525422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022022108321308     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
2. Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252-276.
3. Andolšek, D.M., & Štebe, J. (2004). Multinational perspectives on work values and commitment. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4, 181-209.
4. Azen, R., & Budescu, D.V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129-148.
5. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Transnational management: Text, cases, and readings in cross-border management (3 rd ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw Hill.
7. Bliese, P.D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizational psychology (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Buchko, A.A., Weinzimmer, L.G., & Sergeyev, A.V. (1998). Effects of cultural context on the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment: A study of Russian workers. Journal of Business Research, 43, 109-116.
9. Budescu, D.V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542-551.
10. Cheng, Y., & Stockdale, M.S. (2003). The validity of the three-component model of organizational commitment in a Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 465-489.
11. Cook, J., & Wall, T.D. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
12. Devellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Dunham, R.B., Grube, J.A., & Castañeda, M.B. (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 370-380.
14. Gelade, G.A., Dobson, P., & Gilbert, P. (2006). National differences in organizational commitment: Effect of economy, product of personality, or consequence of culture? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 542-556.
15. Gelfand, M.J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479-514.
16. Harris, C., Daniels, K., & Briner, R.B. (2003). A daily diary study of goals and affective well-being at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 401-410.
17. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Hofstede, G. (1997). The Archimedes effect. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Working at the interface of cultures: 18 lives in social science (pp. 47-61). London: Routledge.
19. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D.D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286-316.
21. Johnson, J.W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1-19.
22. Klein, K.J., Bliese, P.D., Kozlowski, S.W.J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M.B., Griffin, M.A., et al. (2000). Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizational psychology (pp. 512-553). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Knapp, H., & Kirk, S.A. (2003). Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: Does methodology matter ? Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 117-134.
24. Ko, J., Price, J.L., & Mueller, C.W. (1997). Assessment of Meyer's and Allen's three-component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 961-973.
25. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
26. Malka, A., & Chatman, J.A. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic orientations as moderators of the effect of annual income on subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 737-746.
27. Marsden, P.V., Kalleberg, A.L., & Cook, C.R. (1993). Gender differences in organizational commitment: Influences of work positions and family roles. Work and Occupations, 20, 268-390.
28. Mathieu, J.E., & Zajac, D.M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
29. Mehta, R., & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 429-439.
30. Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
31. Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
32. Oishi, S., Diener, E.F., Lucas, R.E., & Suh, E.M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980-990.
33. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R.E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67, 157-184.
34. Palich, L.E., Hom, P.W., & Griffeth, R.W. (1995). Managing in the international context: Testing cultural generality of sources of commitment to multinational enterprises. Journal of Management, 21, 671-690.
35. Randall, D.M. (1993). Cross-cultural research on organizational commitment: A review and application of Hofstede's Value Survey Module. Journal of Business Research, 26, 91-110.
36. Reade, C. (2001). Dual identification in multinational corporations: Local managers, and their psychological attachment to the subsidiary versus the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 405-424.
37. Restubog, S.L.D., & Bordia, P. (2006). Workplace familism and psychological contract breach in the Philippines. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 563-585.
38. Rousseau, D.M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 121-139.
39. Rousseau, D.M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Rousseau, D.M., & Schalk, R. (2000). Psychological contracts in employment: Cross-national perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Schwartz, S.H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
42. Smith, P.B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and values of organizational employees. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231-264.
43. Stanton, J.M. (1998). An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Personnel Psychology, 51, 709-725.
44. Steers, R.M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
45. Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H.C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482-493.
46. Vandenberghe, C. (1996). Assessing organisational commitment in a Belgian context: Evidence for the three-dimensional model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 371-386.
47. Vandenberghe, C., Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., & Delhaise, T. (2001). An examination of the cross-cultural validity of a multidimensional model of commitment in Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 322-347.
48. Walumbwa, F.O., Orwa, B., Wang, P., & Lawler, J.J. (2005). Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction: A comparative study of Kenyan and U.S. financial firms. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 235-256.
49. White, M.M., Parks, J.M., Gallagher, D.G., Tetrault, L.A., & Wakabayashi, M. (1995). Validity evidence for the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire in the Japanese corporate culture. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 278-290.
50. Yousef, D.A. (2003). Validating the dimensionality of Porter et al.'s measurement of organizational commitment in a non-Western culture setting. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 1067-1079.