Implications of rate-limited mass transfer for aquifer storage and recovery

Ground Water

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 591-605

  Culkin, Sean L ^a   Singha, Kamini ^a   Day Lewis, Frederick D ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY; COMMON CRITERIA; FINITE DIFFERENCE; FRESH WATER; GEOCHEMICAL PROCESS; INJECTED FLUIDS; LENGTH SCALE; MODEL RESULTS; MULTI-CYCLE; PILOT SCALE; PORE FLUIDS; RECOVERY EFFICIENCY; SOUTH CAROLINA; TRANSPORT BEHAVIOR;

ADVECTION; AQUIFERS; DISPERSIONS; HYDROGEOLOGY; MASS TRANSFER; REMELTING; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

ADVECTION; AQUIFER; BRACKISH WATER; DISPERSION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; HYDROGEOCHEMISTRY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MASS TRANSFER; NUMERICAL MODEL; SURFACE WATER; WATER STORAGE;

CHARLESTON; NORTH AMERICA; SOUTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

WATER;

ARTICLE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER;

EID: 49649103790     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00435.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aucott, W.A., and G.K. Speiran. 1985. Potentiometric surfaces of the Coastal Plain aquifers of South Carolina prior to development. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4208. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
2. Barker, J.A., T.E.J. Wright, and B.A. Fretwell. 2000. Pulsedvelocity method of double-porosity solute transport modeling. In IAHS Publication no. 262, 297-302.
3. Brothers, K., and T. Katzer. 1990. Water banking through artificial recharge, Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada. Journal of Hydrology 115, no. 1-4: 77-103.
4. Campbell, B.G., K.J. Conlon, J.E. Mirecki, and M.D. Petkewich. 1997. Evaluation of aquifer storage recovery in the Santee Limestone/Black Mingo Aquifer near Charleston, South Carolina, 1993-95. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4283. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
5. Coats, K.H., and B.D. Smith. 1964. Dead end pore volume and dispersion in porous media. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 4, no. 1: 73-84.
6. Eastwood, J., and P. Stanfield. 2001. Key success factors in an ASR scheme. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 35, no. 4: 399-409.
7. Feehley, C.E., C. Zheng, and F.J. Molz. 2000. A dual-domain mass transfer approach for modeling solute transport in heterogeneous aquifers: Application to the macrodispersion experiment (MADE) site. Water Resources Research 26, no. 9: 2501-2516.
8. Flach, G.P., S.A. Crisman, and F.J. Molz. 2004. Comparison of single-domain and dual-domain subsurface transport models. Ground Water 42, no. 6: 815-828.
9. Fleming, S.W., and R. Haggerty. 2001. Modeling solute diffusion in the presence of pore-scale heterogeneity: Method development and an application to the Culebra dolomite member of the rustler formation, New Mexico, USA. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 48, no. 3-4: 253-276.
10. Gaus, I., P. Shand, I.N. Gale, A.T. Williams, and J.C. Eastwood. 2002. Geochemical modeling of fluoride concentration changes during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in he Chalk aquifer in Wessex, England. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 35, no. 2: 203-208.
11. Gleick, P.H. 2000. The World's Water 1998-1999: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
12. Griffioen, J.W., D.A. Barry, and J.Y. Parlange. 1998. Interpretation of two-region model parameters. Water Resources Research 34, no. 3: 373-384.
13. Haggerty, R., and S.M. Gorelick. 1998. Modeling mass transfer processes in soil columns with pore-scale heterogeneity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62, no. 1: 62-74.
14. Haggerty, R., and S.M. Gorelick. 1995. Multiple-rate mass transfer for modeling diffusion and surface reactions in media with pore-scale heterogeneity. Water Resources Research 35, no. 10: 2382-2400.
15. Haggerty, R., S.W. Fleming, L.C. Meigs, and S.A. McKenna. 2001. Tracer tests in a fractured dolomite: 3. Double-porosity, multiple-rate mass transfer processes in convergent flow tracer tests. Water Resources Research 37, no. 5: 1143-1151.
16. Harbaugh, A.W., E.R. Banta, M.C. Hill, and M.G. McDonald. 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. USGS Open- File Report 00-92. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
17. Harvey, C.F., R. Haggerty, and S.M. Gorelick. 1994. Aquifer remediation: A method for estimating mass transfer rate coefficients and an evaluation of pulsed pumping. Water Resources Research 30, no. 7: 1979-1992. (Pubitemid 2115287)
18. Haselow, J.S., and R.A. Greenkorn. 1991. An experimental investigation of the effect of idealized heterogeneity on the dispersion of miscible fluids. Water Resources Research 27, no. 9: 2473-2482.
19. Haws, N.W., B.S. Das, P. Suresh, and C. Rao. 2004. Dualdomain solute transfer and transport processes: Evaluation in batch and transport experiments. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 75, no. 3-4: 257-280.
20. Herczeg, A., K. Rattray, P. Killon, P. Pavelic, and K. Barry. 2004. Geochemical processes during five years of aquifer storage recovery. Ground Water 42, no. 3: 438-445.
21. Le Gal La Salle, C., J. Vanderzalm, J. Hutson, P. Dillon, P. Pavelic, and R. Martin. 2005. Isotope evolution and contribution to geochemical investigations in aquifer storage and recovery: A case study using reclaimed water at Bolivar, South Australia. Hydrological Processes 19, 3395-3411.
22. Lowry, C. 2004. Assessment of aquifer storage recovery; defining hydraulic controls on recovery efficiency at three representative sites in Wisconsin. M.S. thesis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
23. Lowry, C.S., and M.P. Anderson. 2006. An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models. Ground Water 44, no. 5: 661-667.
24. Ma, L., and R.F. Spalding. 1996. Stable isotope characterization of the impacts of artificial ground water recharge. Water Resources Bulletin 26, no. 6: 1273-1282.
25. Mirecki, J.E., B.G. Campbell, K.J. Conlon, and M.D. Petkewich. 1998. Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone/clastic aquifer. Ground Water 36, no. 3: 394-403.
26. Molz, F.J., C. Zheng, S.M. Gorelick, and C.F. Harvey. 2006. Comment on "Investigating the Macrodipersion Experiment (MADE) site in Columbus, Mississippi, using a threedimensional inverse flow and transport model" by Heidi Christiansen Barlebo, Marcy C. Hill, and Dan Rosbjerg. Water Resources Research 42, no. 10: W06603.
27. Parkhurst, D.L., and M.D. Petkewich. 2001. Geochemical modeling of an aquifer storage recovery experiment, Charleston, South Carolina. USGS Open-File Report 02-89. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
28. Pedit, J.A., and C.T. Miller. 1994. Heterogeneous sorption processes in subsurface systems. 1. Model formulations and applications. Environmental Science and Technology 28, no. 12: 2094-2104.
29. Petkewich, M.D., D.L. Parkhurst, K.J. Conlon, B.G. Campbell, and J.E. Mirecki. 2004. Hydrologic and geochemical evaluation of aquifer storage recovery in the Santee Limestone/Black Mingo Aquifer, Charleston, South Carolina, 1998- 2002. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5046. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
30. Plummer, L.N. 1975. Mixing of sea water with calcium carbonate ground water. Geological Society of America Memoir 142, 219-236.
31. Pyne, R.D.G. 1995. Groundwater Recharge and Wells. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers.
32. Rao, P.S.C., D.E. Rolston, R.E. Jessup, and J.M. Davidson. 1980. Solute transport in aggregated porous media. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, no. 6: 1139-1146.
33. Reese, R.S. 2002. Inventory and review of aquifer storage and recovery in Southern Florida. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 04-0236. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
34. Singha, K., F.D. Day-Lewis, and J.W. Lane. 2007. Geoelectrical evidence of biocontinuum transport in groundwater. Geophysical Research Letters 34, no. 12: L12401.
35. Vanderzalm, J.L., C. Le Gal La Salle, J.L. Hutson, and P.J. Dillon. 2002. Water quality changes during aquifer storage and recovery at Bolivar, South Australia. In Management of Aquifer Recharge for Sustainability, ed. P.J. Dillon, 265- 268. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
36. van Genuchten, M.T., and P.J. Wierenga. 1976. Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media I. Analytical solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, no. 4: 473-479.
37. Zheng, C., and G. Bennet. 2002. Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
38. Zheng, C., and P.P. Wang. 1999. MT3DMS, a modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reaction of contaminants in groundwater systems; documentation and user's guide. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Contract Report SERDP-99-1. Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.