An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models

Ground Water

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 661-667

  Lowry, Christopher S ^a   Anderson, Mary P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER STORAGE RECOVERY (ASR); RECOVERY EFFICIENCY; TRACKING MODELS;

GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

AQUIFERS;

FRESH WATER;

AQUIFER; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; PUMPING; RECOVERY; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; STORAGE; WATER RETENTION;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; GEOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRESH WATER; GEOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; GEOLOGY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY; WISCONSIN;

EID: 33748430665     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00237.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Conlon, T.D. 1991. A hydrogeologic investigation of a sand-and-gravel aquifer using reflection seismology and groundwater flow modeling. M.S. thesis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin - Madison.
2. Feinstein, D.T., T.T. Eaton, D.J. Hart, J.T. Krohelski, and K.R. Bradbury. 2003. Regional aquifer model for southeastern Wisconsin. Report 1: Data collection, conceptual model development, numerical model construction, and model calibration. Administrative Report to the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission: Waukesha, Wisconsin.
3. Fram, M.S., B.A. Bergamashci, K.D. Goodwin, R. Jujii, and J.F. Clark. 2003. Processes affecting the trihalomethane concentrations associated with the third injection, storage and recovery test at Lancaster, Antelope Valley, California, March 1998 through April 1999. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 03-4062.
4. Gaus, I., P. Shand, I.N. Gale, A.T. Williams, and J.C. Eastwood. 2002. Geochemical modeling of fluoride concentration changes during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in the Chalk aquifer in Wessex, England. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 35, no. 2: 203-208.
5. Herczeg, A.L., K.J. Rattray, P.J. Dillon, P. Pavelic, and E.B. Karen. 2004. Geochemical processes during five years of aquifer storage recovery. Ground Water 42, no. 3: 438-445.
6. Kimbler, O.K. 1970. Fluid model studies of the storage of freshwater in saline aquifers. Water Resources Research 6, no. 5: 1522-1527.
7. Kimbler, O.K., R.G. Kazmann, and W.R. Whitehead. 1975. Cyclic storage of fresh water in saline aquifers. Louisiana Water Resources Research Institute Bulletin 10. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University.
8. Lowry, C.S. 2004. Assessment of aquifer storage recovery: Defining hydraulic controls on recovery efficiency at three representative sites in Wisconsin. M.S. thesis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin - Madison.
9. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground water flow model. USGS Techniques of Water-Resources Investigation Report, v. 06-A1. 586 p.
10. Merritt, M.L. 1986. Recovering fresh water stored in saline limestone aquifers. Ground Water 24, no. 4: 516-529.
11. Merritt, M.L. 1985. Subsurface storage of freshwater in south Florida: A digital model analysis of recoverability. USGS Water-Supply Paper 2261.
12. Molz, F.J., and L.C. Bell. 1977. Head gradient control in aquifers used for fluid storage. Water Resources Research 13, no. 4: 795-798.
13. Moulder, E.A. 1970. Freshwater bubbles: A possibility for using saline aquifers to store water. Water Resources Research 6, no. 5: 1528-1531.
14. Pollock, D.W. 1994. User's Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological survey finite-difference ground-water flow model. USGS Open-File Report 94-464. USGS: Reston, Virginia.
15. Pyne, R.D.G. 1994. Groundwater Recharge and Wells, 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers.
16. Quinones-Aponte, V., and E.J. Wexler. 1995. Preliminary assessment of injection, storage, and recovery of freshwater in the lower hawthorn aquifer, Cape Coral, Florida. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 94-4121. USGS: Tallahassee, Florida.
17. Rayne, T.W., K.R. Bradbury, and M.A. Muldoon. 2001. Delineation of capture zones for municipal wells in fractured dolomite, Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, USA. Hydrogeology Journal 9, no. 5: 432-450.
18. Rumbaugh, J.O., and D.B. Rumbaugh. 2004. Groundwater Vistas. Reinholds, Pennsylvania: Environmental Simulations Inc. www.groundwatermodels.com.
19. Schulze-Makuch, D. 2005. Longitudinal dispersivity data and implications for scaling behavior. Ground Water 43, no. 3: 443-456.
20. Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, and Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey. 2002. Ground water resources of southeastern Wisconsin. Waukesha, Wisconsin: Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey.
21. Streetly, M.J. 1998. The use of modelling to predict the behavior of ASR systems. In Artificial Recharge of Ground Water, ed. Peter et al., 263-267. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
22. Thomas, J.M., W.A. McKay, E. Cole, J.E. Landmeyer, and P.M. Bradly. 2000. The fate of haloaceticacid and trihalomethanes in an aquifer storage and recovery program, Las Vegas, Nevada. Ground Water 38, no. 4: 605-614.
23. Vacher, H.L., W.C. Hutchings, and D.A. Budd. 2006. Metaphors and models: The ASR bubble in the Floridan aquifer. Ground Water 44, no. 2: 149-154.
24. Wanless, H.R. 2004. Keep it clean and do the research. Ground Water 42, no. 2: 157.
25. Whitehead, W.R., R.G. Kazmann, and O.K. Kimbler. 1978. Comment on 'Head Gradient Control in Aquifers Used for Fluid Storage' by Fred J. Molz and Lansford C. Bell. Water Resources Research 14, no. 2: 381-384
26. Yobbi, D.K. 1996. Simulation of subsurface storage and recovery of treated effluent injected in a saline aquifer, St. Petersburg, Florida. USGS Water-Resources investigations report 95-4271. USGS: Tallahassee, Florida.
27. Zheng, C., and P.P. Wang. 1999. MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multi-species model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in ground water systems: Documentation and user's guide. SERDP-99-1. Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.