Locus of response slowing resulting from alternation-based processing interference

Psychophysiology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 751-758

  Dudschig, Carolin ^a   Jentzsch, Ines ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Control adjustments; LRP; Response alternation; Response conflict; Sequential effects

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ALTERNATION BASED RESPONSE CONFLICT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COGNITION; CONFLICT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROL; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROOCULOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; LATERALIZED READINESS POTENTIAL; MALE; N1 EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; P1 EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 49649083340     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00686.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217 218.
2. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624 652.
3. Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251 269.
4. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G. Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69 89.
5. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G. Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682 692.
6. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H. Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 121, 480 506.
7. Jaskowski, P., Pruszewicz, A. Swidzinski, P. (1990). VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction time distribution. Psychological Research, 52, 28 34.
8. Jentzsch, I. (2001). Sequenzeffekte in Verhalten und Hirnelektrischen Potentialen: Komponentenseparation, Dipolquellenanalyse und Modellierung [Sequential effects in behavior and brain-electrical potentials: Component separation, dipole source analysis and modeling]. Aachen, Germany : Shaker Verlag.
9. Jentzsch, I. Dudschig, C. (2008). Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterror slowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Forthcoming.
10. Jentzsch, I. Leuthold, H. (2005). Response conflict determines sequence effects in serial response time tasks with short response-stimulus intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 731 748.
11. Jentzsch, I., Leuthold, H. Ulrich, R. (2007). Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm: The residual PRP effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 610 626.
12. Jentzsch, I. Sommer, W. (2002). Functional localization and mechanisms of sequential effects in serial reaction time tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1169 1188.
13. Jones, A. D., Cho, R. Y., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D. Braver, T. S. A. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 300 317.
14. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A. Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023 1026.
15. Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicœur, P. Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250 274.
16. Kirby, N. H. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129 172). London : Academic Press.
17. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792 795.
18. Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. London : Academic Press.
19. Laming, D. R. J. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199 224.
20. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W. Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307 323.
21. Melis, A., Soetens, E. van der Molen, M. W. (2002). Process-specific slowing with advancing age: Evidence derived from the analysis of sequential effects. Brain and Cognition, 49, 420 435.
22. Miller, J. O. Low, K. (2001). Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 266 289.
23. Miller, J., Patterson, T. Ulrich, R. (1998). A jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99 115.
24. Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R. Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597 611.
25. Oriet, C. Jolicœur, P. (2003). Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1036 1049.
26. Osman, A. Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292 1312.
27. Osman, A., Moore, C. M. Ulrich, R. (1995). Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: Precue effects of LRP onset. Acta Psychologica, 90, 111 127.
28. Rabbitt, P. M. A. Rogers, B. (1977). What does man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 232 240.
29. Sanders, A. F. (1990). Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123 167.
30. Soetens, E., Boer, L. C. Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 598 616.
31. Soetens, E. Notebaert, W. (2005). Response monitoring and expectancy in random serial RT tasks. Acta Psychologica, 119, 189 216.
32. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H. Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345 1363.
33. Ulrich, R. Miller, J. (2001). Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology, 38, 816 827.
34. Vaughan, H. G. J., Costa, L. D. Gilden, L. (1966). The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Research, 6, 645 656.