Space for Space, a transferable development rights initiative for changing the Dutch landscape

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 192-200

  Janssen Jansen, Leonie B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

European directives; Intensive livestock operations; Rural landscape; The Netherlands; Transferable development rights

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS;

EUROPEAN DIRECTIVE; INTENSIVE LIVESTOCK OPERATIONS; NETHERLANDS; RURAL LANDSCAPES; TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS;

AGRICULTURE;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; RURAL LANDSCAPE; SPACE USE; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 49649083268     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alexander G.S. Propriety through commodity? Why have legal environmentalists embraced market-based solutions?. In: Jacobs H.M. (Ed). Private Property in the 21st Century: the Future of an American Ideal (2004), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 75-91
2. Benjamin K., Bouchard A., and Domon G. Abandoned farmlands as components of rural landscapes: an analysis of perceptions and representations. Landsc. Urban Plan. 83 (2007) 228-244
3. Van den Berg L., and Wintjes A. New rural lifestyle estates in The Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plan. 48 (2000) 169-176
4. CBS (Dutch Statistics Agency), 2007. www.cbs.nl (last date of access: August 31, 2007).
5. Cho C.J. The Korean growth-management programs: issues, problems and possible reforms. Land Use Policy 199 (2002) 13-27
6. Chorus P. Planning in Tokyo, a matter of negotiation. Nova Terra 6 (2006) 19-23 (in Dutch)
7. Daniels T.L. The purchase of development rights: preserving agricultural land and open space. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 57 (1991) 421-431
8. Van Dijk T. Scale dependent synergy between risk management and open space preservation. Proceedings of the Paper Presented at AESOP 2007 Conference Planning for the Risk Society. Naples, July 2007 (2007)
9. Einig, K., 2005. Regulation of growth of built-up areas as challenge for Planning Law, DISP, 160, 48-57 (in German).
10. Freyfogle E.T. The Land We Share: Private Property and the Common Good (2003), Island Press, Washington, DC
11. Janse de Jonge, E., 2002. Renewal Rural Area in Danger. Brabants Dagblad, December 12, 2002 (in Dutch).
12. Janssen-Jansen L.B. Challenged Regions, "Growth Management" as inspiration for new proactive spatial planning. Van Gorcum, Assen. (2004) (in Dutch)
13. Janssen-Jansen L.B., and Mulders M.J.C.B. Conversion implies tears? The development oriented approach of "Space for Space". Bestuurskunde 14/5 (2005) 12-20 (in Dutch)
14. Johnston R.A., and Madison M.E. From landmarks to landscapes, a review of current practices in the transfer of development rights. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 63/3 (1997) 365-379
15. LEI (Agricultural-Economic Institute), 2004. Tradable Developments Rights in Limburg; Rights for Quality, Quality for Rights, LEI, The Hague (in Dutch).
16. MacHemer, P.L., Kaplowitz, M., Edens, T.C., 1999. Managing growth and addressing urban sprawl: The transfer of development rights. Research Report 563. East Lansing, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, Michigan State University.
17. MacHemer P.L., Thomas J., and Hamlin R. Transferable Development Rights, a Policy Brief for the Michigan Legislature (2000), Michigan State University
18. MacHemer P.L., and Kaplowitz M.D. A Framework for evaluating transferable development rights programs. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 45 (2002) 773-795
19. Micelli E. Development rights markets to manage urban plans in Italy. Urban Stud. 39/1 (2002) 141-154
20. Ministry of LNV (Agriculture, Nature Maintenance and Fishery), 2000. Letter to Parliament: proposal for Reconstruction Law Concentration Areas, Trc. 2000/6485, Ministry of LNV, The Hague [in Dutch].
21. Ministry of LNV (Agriculture, Nature Maintenance and Fishery), 2000b. Administrative Agreement "Pact of Brakkenstein", Ministry of LNV, The Hague [in Dutch].
22. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM), LNV (Agriculture, Nature Maintenance and Fishery), EZ (Economic Affairs) and V&W (Traffic and Waterworks), 2004. Report on Space: Space for Development, Ministry of VROM, The Hague [in Dutch].
23. Mulders, M., 2003. Pink for Green, research about the improvement of spatial quality in Brabant as a result of the Space for Space provision, Province of North Brabant, Den Bosch [in Dutch].
24. Needham B. Planning, Law and Economics, the Rules we make for using land, RTPI Library Series (2006), Routledge, London/New York
25. Needham B. Dutch land use planning, planning and managing land use in The Netherlands, the principles and the practice (2007), Sdu Publishers, The Hague
26. Novek J. Intensive hog farming in Manitoba: transnational treadmills and local conflicts. Can. Rev. Sociol. Anthropol. 40 1 (2003) 3-26
27. Novek J. Intensive livestock operations, disembedding, and community polarization in Manitoba. Soc. Nat. Resour. 16 (2003) 567-581
28. Province of North Brabant, 2002. Brabant in Balance, regional plan North Brabant 2002 and development program spatial planning, Province of North Brabant, Den Bosch (in Dutch).
29. Province of North Brabant, 2003. Administrative Agreement 2003-2007 Implementation partnerships, Province of North Brabant, Den Bosch (in Dutch).
30. Province North Brabant, 2006. Progress report Space for Space June 2006, Province of North Brabant, Den Bosch (in Dutch).
31. Pruetz R. Beyond Takings and Givings, Saving Natural Areas, Farmland and Historic Landmarks with Transfer of Development Rights and Density Transfer Charges (2003), Arje Press, Burbank, CA
32. Putters, B., 2007. Transferable Development Rights-US Examples. Paper presented during the Inaugural Conference of the International Academic Forum on Planning, Law and Property Rights, Amsterdam February 7/8, 2007.
33. Renard V. Property rights and the 'transfer of development rights': questions of efficiency and equity. Town Plan. Rev. 78/1 (2007) 41-60
34. Romero-Calcerrada R., and Perry G.L.W. The role of land abandonment in landscape dynamics in the SPA 'Encinares del rio Alberche Y Cofio', Central Spain 1984-1999. Landsc. Urban Plan. 18 (2004) 211-220
35. RPB (Dutch Spatial Planning Agency), 2006. Where Agriculture Disappears. The Dutch Culture Land moving, RPB, The Hague (in Dutch).
36. Scientific Council for Governmental Policy, 1998. Spatial Development Politics, Sdu Publisher, The Hague (in Dutch).
37. Süess A., and Gmünder M. Less sprawl as result of transferable development rights and swiss spatial planning. DISP 2005/160 (2005) 58-66 (in German)
38. Swanborn P.G. Case Studies: What When and How (1996), Boom, Amsterdam (in Dutch)
39. Tavares, A., 2003. Can the market be used to preserve land? the case for transfer of development rights, Paper presented at the European Regional Science Association 2003.
40. TK (Dutch Parliament), 2004. Letter of the minister of Spatial Planning about Land Policy in relation to the implementation of the Report on Space, 2004-2005, 27581, 20, Parliament, The Hague (in Dutch).
41. TK (Dutch Parliament), 2005. Establishment of the Spatial Planning Budgets 2006, 2005-2006, 30000 XI, 70, Parliament, The Hague (in Dutch).
42. Van der Valk A. The Dutch planning experience. Landsc. Urban Plan. 58 (2002) 201-210
43. Verhoeven M. Limburg and TDRs. Rooilijn 38/6 (2005) 280-285 (in Dutch)
44. VROM-Council, 2004. Tools for Development Politics, VROM-Council, The Hague (in Dutch).
45. Wesseling J.W. New solutions for industry land vacancy: tradable industry land quota. Bedrijventerrein (2007 February) 10-15 [in Dutch]