Systematic computational study of the effect of silver nanoparticle dimers on the coupled emission from nearby fluorophores

Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Volumn 112, Issue 30, 2008, Pages 11236-11249

  Chowdhury, Mustafa H ^a   Pond, James ^b   Gray, Stephen K ^c   Lakowicz, Joseph R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Lumerical Solutions Inc   (Canada)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSED SURFACES; COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; EMISSION QUENCHING; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; FAR FIELDS; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME-DOMAIN METHODS; FLUORESCENCE EMISSION INTENSITY; FLUOROPHORE; METAL SURFACES; NEAR FIELDS; POINT DIPOLES; RADIATED POWER; RADIATIVE DECAY RATES; SILVER NANO-PARTICLES; SINGLE NANO-PARTICLE; SURFACE PLASMON EXCITATIONS; TOTAL POWER;

DECAY (ORGANIC); FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FLUOROPHORES; LIGHT EMISSION; LUMINESCENCE; METALS; METHOD OF MOMENTS; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOSTRUCTURES; OLIGOMERS; QUENCHING; SILVER;

FLUORESCENCE;

EID: 49449115885     PISSN: 19327447     EISSN: 19327455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp802414k     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hemmila, I. A. Applications of Fluorescence in Immunoassays; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1992.
2. Mao, C.; Flavin, K. G.; Wang, S.; Dodson, R.; Ross, J.; Shapiro, D. J. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 350, 222.
3. Chen, X.; Levine, L.; Kwok, P-Y. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 492.
4. Ullman, E. F.; Schwarzberg, M.; Rubenstein, K. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1976, 251, 4172.
5. Schobel, U.; Egelhaaf, H-J.; Brecht, A.; Oelkrug, D.; Gauglitz, G. Bioconjugate Chem. 1999, 10, 1107.
6. Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, 2006.
7. Slavik, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1982, 694, 1.
8. Daniel, E.; Weber, G. Coop Effects Binding Albumin 1966, 5, 1893.
9. Hao, E.; Schatz, G. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 357.
10. Atay, T.; Song, J-H.; Nurmikko, A. V. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1627.
11. Taflove, A.; Hagness, S. C. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, 3rd ed.; Artech House: Boston, 2005.
12. Sullivan, D. M. Electromagnetic Simulation Using the FDTD Method; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, 2000.
13. Taflove, A.; Brodwin, M. E. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech q 1975, 23, 623.
14. Yee, K. S. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1966, AP-14, 302.
15. Yang, P.; Liou, N. K. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1995, 12 (1), 162.
16. Yang, P.; Liou, N. K. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1996, 13 (10), 2072.
17. Prather, D. W.; Shi, S. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1999, 16, 1131.
18. Guiffaunt, G.; Mahdjoubi, K. IEEE Ant. Prop. Mag. 2001, 43, 94.
19. Berenger, J. P. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 114, 185.
20. Reference Guide for FDTD Solutions™ Release 5.0 (2007), http://www.lumerical.com/fdtd.
21. Johnson, P. B.; Christy, R. W. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370.
22. Kaminski, F.; Sandoghdar, V.; Agio, M. J. Comp. Theor. Nanosci. 2007, 4, 635.
23. Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1975.
24. Chowdhury, M. H.; Gray, S. K.; Pond, J.; Geddes, C. D.; Asian, K.; Lakowicz, J. R. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2007, 24, 2259.
25. Härding, T.; Reichenbach, P.; Eng, L. M. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 12806.
26. Liaw, J-W. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 46 (8A), 5373.
27. Drexhage, K. H. J. Luminesc 1970, 1 (2), 693.
28. Chance, R. R.; Miller, A. H.; Prock, A.; Silbey, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 63 (4), 1589.
29. Shadowitz, A. The Electromangetic Field; Dover: New York, 1988.