What do juvenile offenders know about being tried as adults? Implications for deterrence

Juvenile and Family Court Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 35-44

  Redding, Richard E ^b   Fuller, Elizabeth J ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4944267514     PISSN: 01617109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2004.tb00167.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Andreasen, A. A., & Andreasen, A. R. (1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development and the environment. New York: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bailey, W. C. (1990). Murder, capital punishment, and television: Execution publicity and homicide rates. American Sociological Review, 55, 628-633.
3. Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (2000). Consequences of transfer. In J. Fagan & F. E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 227-276). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bowers, W. C. (1998). Deterrence, brutalization, and the death penalty: Another examination of Oklahoma's return to capital punishment. Criminology, 36, 711-733.
5. Bowers, W. C., & Pierce, G. L. (1980). Deterrence or brutalization: What is the effect of executions? Crime & Delinquency, 26, 453-484.
6. Burnett, R. (2000, March). Understanding criminal careers through a series of in-depth interviews. Offender Programs Report, 4(1), 1, 14-16.
7. Corrado, R. R., Cohen, I. M., Glackman,W., & Odgers, C. (2003). Serious and violent young offenders' decisions to recidivate: An assessment of five sentencing models. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 179-200.
8. Elder, R. W., Shults, R. A., Sleet, D. A., Nichols, J. L.,Thompson, R. S., & Rajab, W. (2004). Effectiveness of mass media campaigns for reducing drinking and driving and alcohol-involved crashes: A systemic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), 57-65.
9. Fagan, J., & Zimring, F. E. (Eds.). (2000). The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Finckenauer, J. O., & Gavin, P. W. (1999). Scared straight: The panacea phenomenon revisited. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
11. Georgia Indigent Defense Council. (2002). Juveniles arrested as adults under SB440: Fiscal year 2002 final report. Atlanta, GA: Author.
12. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. (1999). Lifetime likelihood of going to a Georgia state prison. Atlanta, GA: Author.
13. Glassner, B., Ksander, M., Berg, B., & Johnson, B. D. (1983). A note on the deterrent effect of juvenile versus adult jurisdiction. Social Problems, 31, 219-221.
14. Grahn-Farley, M. (2002). A child perspective on the juvenile justice system. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 6, 297-335.
15. Griffin, E (2003). Trying and sentencing juveniles as adults: An analysis of state transfer and blended sentencing laws. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
16. Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K.J. (2003). Opportunity is in the eye of the beholder: The role of publicity in crime prevention. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 497-524.
17. Kleiman, M. (1999). Getting deterrence right: Applying tipping models and behavioral economics to the problems of crime control. In Perspectives on crime and justice: 1998-1999 lecture series (Vol. 3, pp. 1-29). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
18. Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. S. (1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27, 721-726.
19. Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: John Wiley.
20. McCord, J. (1999). Interventions: Punishment, diversion, and alternative routes to crime prevention. In A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 559-579). New York: Wiley.
21. Michaelis, K. L. (2001). School violence: The call for a critical theory of juvenile justice. B.Y.U. Education & Law Journal, 2001, 299-326.
22. Morris, A., & Giller, H. (1987). Understanding juvenile justice. New York: Croom Helm.
23. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
24. Peterson-Badali, M., Ruck, M. D., & Koegl, C. J. (2001). Youth court dispositions: Perceptions of Canadian juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 593-605.
25. Redding, R. E. (1997). Juveniles transferred to criminal court: Legal reform proposals based on social science research. Utah Law Review, 709-763.
26. Redding, R. E. (1999). Juvenile offenders in criminal court and adult prison: Legal, psychological, and behavioral outcomes. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 50(1), 1-20.
27. Redding, R. E. (2003). The effects of adjudicating and sentencing juveniles as adults: Research and policy implications. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 1, 128-155.
28. Redding, R. E., & Mrozoski, B. S. (In press). Adjudicatory and dispositional decision making in juvenile justice. In K. Heilbrun, N. Goldstein, & R. Redding (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency: Prevention, assessment and intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Redding, R. E., & Shalf, S.A. (2000).The legal context of school violence: The effectiveness of federal, state, and local law enforcement efforts to reduce gun violence in schools. Law & Policy, 23, 297-343.
30. Sanborn, J. B. (2003). Hard choices or obvious ones: Developing policy for excluding youth from juvenile court. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 198-214.
31. Scott, E. S., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. L. (1995). Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law & Human behavior, 19, 221-244.
32. Steinberg, L., & Cauffman. E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law & Human Behavior, 20, 249-272.
33. Steiner, M. A., & Hemmens, C. (2003). Juvenile waiver 2003: Where are we now? Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 54(2), 1-24.
34. Thomas, C.W., & Bishop, D. M. (1984).The impact of legal sanctions on delinquency: A longitudinal comparison of labeling and deterrence theories. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 75, 1222-1245.
35. Thomson, E. (1997). Deterrence versus brutalization:The case of Arizona. Homicide Studies, 1, 110-128.
36. Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E., Burney, E., & Wikstrom, P. O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. Oxford, UK: Hart.
37. Wheeler, J. A., Worthington, K. L., McCann, T., & Phillips, D. (1999). Once we know who, what, & where, will we ask why?: Demographics and dispositions of children processed in the adult criminal justice system in Georgia. Quinnipiac Law Review, 18, 597-642.
38. Winner, L., Lanza-Kaduce, L., Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (1997). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Reexamining recidivism over the long term. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 548-563.
39. Zimring, F. E. (2000). The punitive necessity of waiver. In J. Fagan & F. E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 207-226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.