The effects of adjudicating and sentencing juveniles as adults: Research and Policy Implications

Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 128-155

  Redding, Richard E ^a  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

criminal court; incarceration; juvenile offenders; sentencing; transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 4944240446     PISSN: 15412040     EISSN: 15569330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1541204002250875     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Ainsworth, J.E. (1991). Re-imagining childhood and reconstructing the legal order: The case for abolishing the juvenile court. North Carolina Law Review, 69, 1083-1140.
2. Altschuler, D.M., & Armstrong, T.L. (1994). Intensive aftercare for high-risk juveniles: A community care model (Summary). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
3. Annino, P.G. (2000). Children in adult prisons: A call for a moratorium. Florida State University Law Review, 28, 471-490.
4. Austin, J.P., Johnson, K.D., & Gregoriou, M. (2000). Juveniles in adult prisons and jails: A national assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
5. Barton, W.H., & Butts, J.A. (1990). Viable options: Intensive supervision programs for juvenile delinquents. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 238-256.
6. Bazemore, G. (1992, September). On mission statements and reform in juvenile justice: The case of a “balanced approach.” Federal Probation Quarterly, 64-70.
7. Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 296-316.
8. Bebchuk, L.A., & Kaplow, L. (1992). Optimal sanctions when individuals are imperfectly informed about the probability of apprehension. Journal of Legal Studies, 21, 365-370.
9. Bennett, W.J., DiIulio, J.J., & Walters, J.P. (1996). Body count: Moral poverty and how to win America's war against crime and drugs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10. Beyer, M. (1997). Experts for juveniles at risk of adult sentences. In P. Puritz, A. Capozello, & W. Shang (Eds.), More than meets the eye: Rethinking assessment, competency and sentencing for a harsher era of juvenile justice (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: American Bar Association, Juvenile Justice Center.
11. Bishop, D.M. (2000). Justice offenders in the adult criminal justice system. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 26, 81-167). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Bishop, D.M., & Frazier, C.E. (1991). Transfer of juveniles to criminal court: A case study and analysis of prosecutorial waiver. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Policy, 5, 281-302.
13. Bishop, D.M., & Frazier, C.E. (2000). Consequences of transfer. In J. Fagan & F.E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 227-276). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Bishop, D.M., Frazier, C.E., & Henretta, J.C. (1989). Prosecutorial waiver: Case study of questionable reform. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 179-201.
15. Bishop, D.M., Frazier, C.E., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Winner, L. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference? Crime and Delinquency, 42, 171-191.
16. Bonnie, R.J. (1989). Juvenile homicide: A study in legal ambivalence. In E.P. Benedek & D.G. Cornell (Eds.), Juvenile homicide (pp. 185-217). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
17. Borduin, C.M., Mann, B.J., Cone, L.T., Henggeler, S.W., Fucci, B.R., Blaske, D.M., et al. (1995). Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 569-578.
18. Bortner, M.A. (1986). Traditional rhetoric, organizational realities: Remand of juveniles to adult court. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 53-73.
19. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Brown, J., & Langan, P. (1998). State court processing of convicted felons, 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1998). Washington, DC: Author.
22. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2000). Profile of state prisoners under age 18, 1985-97. Washington, DC: Author.
23. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
24. Butts, J.A. (1997). Necessarily relative: Is juvenile justice speedy enough? Crime and Delinquency, 43, 3-23.
25. Butts, J.A., & Connors-Beatty, D.J. (1992). A comparison of juvenile court's and criminal court's response to violent offenders: 1985-1989. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
26. Butts, J.A., & Halemba, G.J. (1996). Waiting for justice. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
27. Champion, D.J. (1989). Teenage felons and waiver hearings: Some recent trends, 1980-1988. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 577-585.
28. City of Jacksonville, Florida. (2001). Juvenile justice comprehensive strategy. Retrieved April 30, 2001, from www.oiidp.ncirs.org
29. Clarke, E.E. (1996). A case for reinventing juvenile transfer. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 47, 3-21.
30. Cover, R.M. (1986). Violence and the word. Yale Law Journal, 95, 1601-1629.
31. Dawson, R.O. (1992). An empirical study of Kent style juvenile transfers to criminal court. St. Mary's Law Journal, 23, 975-1054.
32. Dawson, R.O. (2000). Judicial waiver theory and practice. In J. Fagan & F.E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 45-81). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. DiIulio, J.J., & Piehl, A.M. (1995). “Does prison pay?” Revisited. Brookings Review, 13, 21-25.
34. Eisikovits, Z., & Baizerman, M. (1983). “Doin’ time”: Violent youth in a juvenile facility and in an adult prison. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 6(3), 5-20.
35. Fagan, J.A. (1990). Social and legal policy dimensions of violent juvenile crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 93-133.
36. Fagan, J.A. (1996). The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Law and Policy, 18, 77-113.
37. Fagan, J., Forst, M., & Vivona, S.T. (1987). Racial determinants of the judicial transfer decision: Prosecuting violent youth in criminal court. Crime and Delinquency, 33, 259-286.
38. Fagan, J.A., & Freeman, R.B. (1999). Crime and work. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 25, 225-290). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Feld, B.C. (1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 156-210.
40. Feld, B.C. (1993). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, 197-280). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Feld, B.C. (2000). Legislative exclusion of offenses from juvenile court jurisdiction: A history and critique. In J. Fagan & F.E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 83-144). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Fendrich, M., & Archer, M. (1998). Long-term rearrest rates in a sample of adjudicated delinquents: Evaluating the impact of alternative programs. Prison Journal, 78, 360-389.
43. Finckenauer, J.O., & Gavin, P.W. (1999). Scared straight: The panacea phenomenon revisited. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
44. Fisher, W.S., & Teichman, L. (1986). Juvenile waivers to adult court: A report to the New Jersey state legislature. Criminal Justice Quarterly, 9, 68-103.
45. Forst, M., Fagan, J., & Vivona, S.T. (1989). Youth in prisons and training schools: Perceptions and consequences of the treatment-custody dichotomy. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 40, 1-14.
46. Fried, C.S., & Reppucci, N.D. (2001). Criminal decision making: The development of adolescent judgment, criminal responsibility, and culpability. Law and Human Behavior, 25(2), 45-61.
47. Fritsch, E.J., Caeti, T.J., & Hemmens, C. (1996). Spare the needle but not the punishment: The incarceration of waived youth in adult prisons. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 593-609.
48. General Accounting Office. (1995). Juveniles processed in criminal court and case dispositions. Washington, DC: Author.
49. Gilliard, D.K. (1999). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
50. Glassner, B., Ksander, M., Berg, B., & Johnson, B.D. (1983). A note on the deterrent effect of juvenile versus adult jurisdiction. Social Problems, 31, 219-221.
51. Glick, B., & Sturgeon, W. (2001). Recess is over: A handbook for managing youthful offenders in adult systems. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
52. Goodstein, L. (1979). Inmate adjustment to prison and the transition to community life. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16, 246-272.
53. Gottfredson, S.D., & Gottfredson, D.M. (1986). Accuracy of prediction models. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J.A. Roth, & C.A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and “career criminals” (Vol. 2, 212-290). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. Gragg, F. (1986). Juveniles in adult court: A review of transfers at the habitual serious and violent juvenile offender program sites (Working paper). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Delinquency and Prevention.
55. Heilbrun, A.B. (1979). Psychopathology and violent crime. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 509-516.
56. Heilbrun, K., Leheny, C., Thomas, L., & Huneycutt, D. (1997). A national survey of U.S. statutes on juvenile transfer: Implications for policy and practice. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 125-149.
57. Henggeler, S.W., Schoenwald, S.K., Borduin, C.M., Rowland, M.D., & Cunningham, P.B. (1998). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.
58. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. Houghtalin, M., & Mays, L.G. (1991). Criminal dispositions of New Mexico juveniles transferred to adult court. Crime and Delinquency, 37, 393-407.
60. Howell, J.C. (Ed.). (1995). Guide for implementing the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders (Summary). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
61. Howell, J.C. (1996). Juvenile transfers to the criminal justice system: State of the art. Law and Policy, 18, 17-60.
62. Howell, J.C. (1997). Juvenile justice and youth violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Jensen, E.L. (1994). The waiver of juveniles to criminal court: Policy goals, empirical realities, and suggestions or change. Idaho Law Review, 31, 173-204.
64. Jensen, E.L., & Metsger, L.K. (1994). A test of the deterrent effect of legislative waiver on violent juvenile crime. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 96-104.
65. Kahan, D.M. (1997). Between economics and sociology: The new path of deterrence. Michigan Law Review, 95, 2477-2497.
66. Kennedy, D.M. (1997). Juvenile gun violence and gun markets in Boston. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
67. Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966).
68. Kinder, K., Veneziano, C., Fichter, M., & Azuma, H. (1995). A comparison of the dispositions of juvenile offenders certified as adult with juvenile offenders not certified. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 46(3), 37-42.
69. Kleiman, M. (1999). Getting deterrence right: Applying tipping models and behavioral economics to the problems of crime control. In Perspectives on crime and justice: 1998-1999 lecture series (Vol. 3, 1-29). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
70. Klepper, S., & Nagin, D.S. (1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27, 721-726.
71. Krisberg, B., & Howell, J.C. (1998). The impact of the juvenile justice system and prospects for graduated sanctions in a comprehensive strategy. In R. Loeber & D.P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 346-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Langan, P.A. (1991). America's soaring prison population. Science, 251, 1568-1573.
73. Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1987). Negative reactions to processing and substance use among young incarcerated males. Deviant Behavior, 8, 131-148.
74. Levitt, S.D. (1996). The effect of prison population size on crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 319-351.
75. Levitt, S.D. (1998). Juvenile crime and punishment. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1156-1185.
76. Lipsey, M.W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T.D. Cook, H. Cooper, D.S. Cordray, H. Hartman, L.V. Hedges, R.J. Knight, T.A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
77. Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (1998). Effective interventions with serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D.P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78. LIS, Inc. (1995). Offenders under age 18 in state adult correctional systems: A national picture (Special Issues in Corrections, No. 1). Longmont, CA: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
79. Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1995).
80. Mason, C.A. (2000). Juvenile sentencing advocacy project: Evaluation report. Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Defender's Office.
81. Mason, C.A., & Chang, S. (2001). Re-arrest rates among youth sentenced in adult court. Unpublished report, Miami-Dade County Public Defender's Office, Florida.
82. Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: John Wiley.
83. McShane, M.D., & Williams, F.P. (1989). The prison adjustment of juvenile offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 254-269.
84. Merlo, A.X., Benekos, P.J., & Cook, W.J. (1997). “Getting tough” with youth: Legislative waiver as crime control. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 48(3), 1-15.
85. Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
86. Myers, D.L. (2001). Excluding violent youths from juvenile court: The effectiveness of legislative waiver. New York: LFB Scholarly.
87. Nagin, D.S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23, 51-91.
88. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1996). Combating violence and delinquency: The national juvenile justice action plan (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
89. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2000). Census of juveniles in residential placement datebook (Fact sheet). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
90. Owens, T. (1999, April). Dual track management of the youthful offender. Corrections Today, 102-105.
91. Parent, D., Leiter, V., Livens, L., Wentworth, D., & Stephen, K. (1994). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1992: A national crime victimization survey report (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
92. Pasternoster, R. (1989a). Absolute and restrictive deterrence in a panel of youth: Explaining the onset, persistence/desistance, and frequency of offending. Social Problems, 36, 289-309.
93. Pasternoster, R. (1989b). Decisions to participate in and desist from four types of delinquency: Deterrence and the rational choice perspective. Social Problems, 23, 7-40.
94. Petersilia, J., Turner, S., Kahan, J., & Peterson, J. (1985). Executive summary of Rand's study: “Granting felons probation: Public risks and alternatives.” Crime and Delinquency, 31, 379-392.
95. Piaget, J. (1969). Le developpement de la notion de temps chez l’enfant [The child's conception of time]. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1927)
96. Podkopacz, M.R., & Feld, B.C. (1996). The end of the line: An empirical study of judicial waiver. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 449-492.
97. Puritz, P., & Scali, M.A. (1998). Beyond the walls: Improving conditions of confinement for youths in custody. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
98. Puzzanchera, C., Stahl, A.L., Finnegan, T.A., Snyder, H.N., Poole, R.S., & Tierney, N. (2000). Juvenile court statistics, 1997 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
99. Redding, R.E. (1997). Juveniles transferred to criminal court: Legal reform proposals based on social science research. Utah Law Review, 1997, 709-763.
100. Redding, R.E. (2003). “It's not a game anymore”: What criminal court adjudication teaches juvenile offenders. Unpublished manuscript, Villanova University.
101. Redding, R.E., & Howell, J.C. (2000). Blended sentencing in American juvenile courts. In J. Fagan & F.E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 145-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
102. Rudman, C., Harstone, E., Fagan, J., & Moore, M. (1986). Violent youth in adult court: Process and punishment. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 75-96.
103. Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points in life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
104. Scheidegger, K., & Rushford, M. (1999). The social benefits of confining habitual criminals. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 11, 59-64.
105. Schneider, A.L., & Ervin, L. (1990). Specific deterrence, rational choice, and decision heuristics: Applications in juvenile justice. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 585-601.
106. Scott, E.S., Reppucci, N.D., & Woolard, J.L. (1995). Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 221-244.
107. Sherman, L.W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 445-473.
108. Sickmund, M. (1994). How juveniles get to criminal court (Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
109. Sickmund, M., Snyder, H.N., & Poe-Yamagata, E. (1997). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1997 update on violence (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
110. Singer, S. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
111. Singer, S.I., & McDowall, D. (1988). Criminalizing delinquency: The deterrent effects of the New York juvenile offender law. Law and Society Review, 22, 521-535.
112. Snyder, H.N. (1998). Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders—An assessment of the extent of and trends in officially recognized serious criminal behavior in a delinquent population. In R. Loeber & D.P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: National report 1999 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
114. Snyder, H.N., Sickmund, M., & Poe-Yamagata, E. (1996). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1996 update on violence (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
115. State v. R.G.D., 527 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1987).
116. Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249-272.
117. Strom, K. (2000). Profile of state prisoners under age 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Statistics.
118. Strom, K., Smith, S., & Snyder, H. (1998). State court processing statistics, 1990-94: Juvenile felony defendants in criminal courts (Special report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
119. Tate, D.C., Reppucci, N.D., & Mulvey, E.P. (1995). Violent juvenile delinquents: Treatment effectiveness and implications for future action. American Psychologist, 50, 777-781.
120. Thomas, C.W., & Bishop, D.M. (1984). The impact of legal sanctions on delinquency: A longitudinal comparison of labeling and deterrence theories. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1222-1245.
121. Tittle, C. (1985). Can social science answer questions about deterrence for policy use? In R.L. Shotland & M.M. Mark (Eds.), Social science and social policy (pp. 265-294). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
122. Torbet, P., Gable, R., Hurst, H., Montgomery, I., Szymanski, L., & Thomas, D. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime (Research report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
123. Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). State legislative responses to serious and violent juvenile crime: 1996-97 update (Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
124. Tyler, T.R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
125. Virginia Commission on Youth. (1994). Report of the Virginia Commission on Youth on the study of serious juvenile offenders. Richmond: General Assembly, House of Virginia.
126. Virginia Commission on Youth. (1996). The study of juvenile justice system reform (House Document No. 37). Richmond: General Assembly of Virginia.
127. Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A.E., Burney, E., & Wikström, P.O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. Oxford, UK: Hart.
128. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (1998). Watching the bottom line: Cost-effective interventions for reducing crime in Washington. Olympia, WA: Author.
129. Wells, L.E., & Rankin, J.H. (1983). Self-concept as a mediating factor in delinquency. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 11-22.
130. Wilson, J.J., & Howell, J.C. (1993). A comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
131. Wilson, J.Q., & Herrnstein, R.J. (1985). Crime and human nature: The definitive study of the causes of crime. New York: Simon & Schuster.
132. Winner, L., Lanza-Kaduce, L., Bishop, D.M., & Frazier, C.E. (1997). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Reexamining recidivism over the long term. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 548-563.
133. Wooldredge, J.D. (1988). Differentiating the effects of juvenile court sentences on eliminating recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 264-300.
134. Ziedenberg, J., & Schiraldi, V. (1997). The risks juveniles face when they are incarcerated with adults. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from http://www.cjcj.org/jpi/risks.html
135. Zimring, F.E. (1998). American youth violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
136. Zimring, F.E. (2000). The punitive necessity of waiver. In J. Fagan & F.E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 207-226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.