Genetic privacy: Resolving the conflict between the donor and the child

Current Science

Volumn 86, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1363-1365

  Basu, Saionton ^a  

^a NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4944254560     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. 1. In the 26 years since its birth, IVF has improved greatly and diffused widely. With more than two thousand children born worldwide, the technique is now recognized as 'an acceptable treatment for achieving pregnancy for couples in which the wife has absent or irreparably damaged fallopian tubes'.
2. Annas and Elias, Fam. Law Q., 1983-84, 17, 199.
3. Curie-Cohen, M., Luttrell, L. and Shapiro, S., N. Engl. J. Med., 1979, 300, 585.
4. Lamport, A. T., Am. J. Law Med., 1988, 14, 109.
5. Bloodsaw vs. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories, No. 96-16526, 9th Cir. 3 February 1998.
6. Georgia Code Ann §33-54-3; Missouri Rev. Statute §191-317; Florida Statute Ann §405.01-405.03.
7. Maryland Code Ann §223.1.
8. Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilization and Embryology Report, 1984.
9. Deech, R., Mod. Law Rev., 1998, 61, 697.
10. In Re Linda M, 409 NYS 2d 638; In Re Assalone, 512 A. 2d 1383; Rhodes vs. Laurino, 444 F. Supp 170.
11. Mills vs. Atlantic City Department of Vital Statistics, 372 A.2d 646.
12. Mr. X vs. Hospital Z, 1998, 8 SCC 296.
13. Berry vs. Moench, 331 P.2d 814.
14. Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Subjects, Indian Council of Medical Research, 2000.
15. O'Donovan, K., Int. J. Law Fam., 1996, 4, 27; See also Freeman, M., Int. J. Child. Rights, 1996, 4, 273.
16. O'Donovan, K., Int. J. Law Fam., 1996, 4, 27; See also Freeman, M., Int. J. Child. Rights, 1996, 4, 273.
17. Section 50, Adoption Act, 1976 of the United Kingdom.
18. Davies, M., Textbook on Medical Law, Blackstone Press Limited, London, 1998, 2nd edn, p. 241.
19. Proceedings of the Third Session of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO, September 1995.
20. Arts. 7 and 8, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989; Art 8. European Convention on Human Rights, 1950. See also Preamble to the Council of Europe, Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine; UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Human Genome and Human Rights.
21. Arts. 7 and 8, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989; Art 8. European Convention on Human Rights, 1950. See also Preamble to the Council of Europe, Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine; UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Human Genome and Human Rights.
22. Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan, 1997, 6 SCC 241; Gramophone Company of India Ltd. vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey, AIR 1984 SC 667.
23. Guidelines for Assisted Reproductive Technologies in India, Indian Council of Medical Research. See also Dental Council of India vs. Subharti Charitable Trust, 2001, 5 SCC 486; Goa Foundation vs. Diksha Holdings Pvt Ltd, 2000 (7) SCALE 390; State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Ganesh Wood Products, AIR 1996 SC 149. (The Court upheld guidelines of the regulating agencies in each of the above-mentioned cases.)
24. Guidelines for Assisted Reproductive Technologies in India, Indian Council of Medical Research. See also Dental Council of India vs. Subharti Charitable Trust, 2001, 5 SCC 486; Goa Foundation vs. Diksha Holdings Pvt Ltd, 2000 (7) SCALE 390; State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Ganesh Wood Products, AIR 1996 SC 149. (The Court upheld guidelines of the regulating agencies in each of the above-mentioned cases.)
25. Per Bhagwati, J., In Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597; All India Bank Employees Association vs. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 171. See also Bhattacharjee, A. M., Equality Liberty and the Property under the Constitution of India, Eastern Law House, Calcutta, 1997, p. 60.
26. Per Bhagwati, J., In Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597; All India Bank Employees Association vs. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 171. See also Bhattacharjee, A. M., Equality Liberty and the Property under the Constitution of India, Eastern Law House, Calcutta, 1997, p. 60.
27. Chandra Bhavan vs. State of Mysore, AIR 1970 SC 2042; A. B. S. K. Sangh vs. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 298.