Bond strength of simplified-step adhesives to enamel prepared with two different diamond burs

Australian Dental Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 141-145

  Sevgican, F ^a   Inoue, S ^b   Koase, K ^c   Kawamoto, C ^c   Ikeda, T ^c   Sano, H ^c  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bond strength; Bur prepared enamel; Smear layer

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; DIAMOND; RESIN; WATER;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENAMEL; GRINDING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; TISSUE SECTION;

EID: 4944239133     PISSN: 00450421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2004.tb00063.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sano H, Inoue S, Noda M, et al. Long-term durability of resin-dentin bonds. In: Modern trends in adhesive dentistry. Osaka: Kuraray Co Ltd, 1999:32-38.
2. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;2:95-110.
3. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853.
4. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Operative Dent 2001;6:119-144.
5. Nakajima M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to demineralized dentin under wet vs. dry surface condition. In: Modern trends in adhesive dentistry. Osaka: Kuraray Co Ltd, 1999:134-140.
6. Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Abe Y, et al. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive. Dent Mater 2001;17:445-455.
7. Al-Omari WM, Mitchell CA, Cunningham JL. Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentine surfaces prepared with different dental burs. J Oral Rehabil 2001;7:645-650.
8. Xu HHK, Kelly JR, Jahanmir S, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Enamel subsurface damage due to tooth preparation with diamonds. J Dent Res 1997;10:1698-1706.
9. Inoue H, Inoue S, Uno S, et al. Microtensile bond strength of two single-step adhesive systems to bur-prepared dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;2:129-136.
10. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al. The microterisile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999;4:299-309.
11. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240.
12. Carvalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CAO, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effects of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhes Dent 2000;4:251-257.
13. Jung M, Wehlen LO, Klimek J. Surface roughness and bond strength of enamel to composite. Dent Mater 1999;15:250-256.
14. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:414-420.
15. Rosa BT and Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 2000;5:353-358.
16. Koase K, Inoue S, Noda M, et al. Effect of bur ground dentin on bond strength using two all-in-one and two-step adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent (in press).