The Value of Feedback in an Early Field Experience: Peer, Teacher, and Supervisor Coaching

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 66-74

  Anderson, Nancy A ^a   Radencich, Marguerite Cogorno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4944232761     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2001.10463076     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, N. A., 1998. Providing feedback to preservice teachers of reading in the field. Reading Research and Instruction, 37: 123–136.
2. Anderson, N. A., 1993. Problems encountered in an early field experience. Education, 113: 606–614.
3. Anderson, N. A., Caswell, I. J., and Hayes, M. E., 1994. “ Using peer coaching to provide additional feedback to preservice teachers of reading in an early field experience ”. In Pathways for literacy: Learners teach and teachers learn, 211–221. Columbia, MD: College Reading Association.
4. Anderson, N. A., and Greabell, L. C., 1990. Usefulness of an early field experience. The Teacher Educator, 26 (2): 13–20.
5. Baxter-Magolda, M. B., 1992. Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender related patterns in students' intellectual development, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
6. Bogdan, R. C., and Biklen, S. K., 1992. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods, 2nd ed., Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Brindley, R. N., 1996. The extent to which student teachers develop a constructivist epistemology and use it to guide their classroom practice, Athens: University of Georgia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
8. Buttery, T. J., and Weller, L. D., 1988. Group clinical supervision: A paradigm for preservice instructional enhancement. Action in Teacher Education, 10: 61–73.
9. Calderhead, J., 1991. The nature and growth of knowledge in student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7: 531–535.
10. Dodds, P., 1979. A peer assessment model for student teacher supervision. Research Quarterly, 50: 18–29.
11. Fuller, F., and Brown, O., 1975. “ Becoming a teacher ”. In Teacher education, Edited by: Ryan, K., 25–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 74th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. II.
12. Gleissman, D. H., 1984. “ Changing teaching performance ”. In Advances in teacher education, Vol. 1, Edited by: Katz, L. G., and Raths, J. D., 95–111. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Gore, J. M., and Zeichner, K., 1991. Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7: 119–136.
14. Grimmet, P. P., 1991. “ Teacher planning, collegiality, and the education of teachers: A developmental integration of research-validated knowledge with practice ”. In Advances in teacher education, Vol. 4, Edited by: Katz, L. G., and Raths, J. D., 50–81. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Hatch, D. D., 1993. “ Early encounters: Coaching in teacher education ”. In Clinical supervision: Coaching for higher performance, Edited by: Anderson, R. H., Snyder, K. J., and Bahner, J. M., 169–182. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
16. Hendrickson, J. M., Sroka, K., and Gable, R. A., 1988. Peer coaching: A specific approach for improving teacher performance and trainee competence, Gainesville, FL: Department of Special Education, University of Florida. (Report No. EC 212 138). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 942)
17. Hollingsworth, S., 1994. Teacher research and urban literacy education: Lessons and conversations in a feminist key, New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Kagan, D. M., and Tippins, D., 1991. How teachers' classroom cases express their pedagogical beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education, 42: 281–291.
19. Lythcott, J., and Schwartz, F., 1994. “ Professional development in action: An idea with visiting rights ”. In Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession, Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L., 126–155. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Marshall, C., and Rossmann, G. B., 1989. Designing qualitative research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Morgan, R. L., Menlove, R., Salzberg, C. L., and Hudson, P., 1994. Effects of peer coaching on the acquisition of direct instruction skills by low-performing preservice teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 28: 59–76.
22. Nettle, T., 1988. A teaching and learning approach to supervision within a teacher education program. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14: 125–133.
23. Radencich, M. C., Richards, J., King, J. R., Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., Oropallo, K., and Draper, M., Themes in preservice teachers' case narratives: Comparisons across three field settings. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference. Charleston, SC. November.
24. Schwartz, F., 1996. Why many new teachers are unprepared to teach in most New York City schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78: 82–84.
25. Tabachnick, B. R., Popkewitz, T., and Zeichner, K., 1979. Teacher education and the professional perspectives of student teachers. Interchange on Educational Policy, 10: 12–29.
26. Van Manen, M., 1990. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
27. Wilkes, P. B., 1988. Mentor teams: A study of peer coaching and collaboration in elementary preservice field experiences (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49: 1122 (University Microfilms No. AAC8814199)
28. Wynn, M. J., 1988. Peer coaching enhances student teacher transfer of training. Florida ASCD Journal, 5 Fall: 29–32.