Structural Basis of PxxDY Motif Recognition in SH3 Binding

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 382, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 167-178

  Aitio, Olli ^a   Hellman, Maarit ^a   Kesti, Tapio ^b   Kleino, Iivari ^b   Samuilova, Olga ^b   Pääkkönen, Kimmo ^a   Tossavainen, Helena ^a   Saksela, Kalle ^b   Permi, Perttu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

CD3 ; complex structure; Eps8L1; NMR; SH3

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; CARBOXYL GROUP; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR PATHWAY SUBSTRATE 8; HYDROXYL GROUP; ISOLEUCINE; PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; PHENYLALANINE; PROLINE; PROTEIN SH3; TYROSINE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 49349107736     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cicchetti P., Mayer B.J., Thiel G., and Baltimore D. Identification of a protein that binds to the SH3 region of Abl and is similar to Bcr and GAP-rho. Science 257 (1992) 803-806
2. Musacchio A. How SH3 domains recognize proline. Adv. Protein Chem. 61 (2002) 211-268
3. Lee C.H., Saksela K., Mirza U.A., Chait B.T., and Kuriyan J. Crystal structure of the conserved core of HIV-1 Nef complexed with a Src family of SH3 domain. Cell 85 (1996) 931-942
4. Liu Q., Berry D., Nash P., Pawson T., McGlade J., and Li S.S.-U. Structural basis for specific binding of the Gads SH3 domain to an RxxK motif-containing SLP-76 peptide: a novel mode of peptide recognition. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 471-481
5. Hoelz A., Janz J.M., Lawrie S.D., Corwin B., Lee A., and Sakman T. Crystal structure of the SH3 domain of βPIX in complex with a high affinity peptide from PAK2. J. Mol. Biol. 358 (2006) 509-522
6. DiFiore P.P., and Scita G. Eps8 in the midst of GTPases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 34 (2002) 1178-1183
7. Offenhäuser N., Borgonovo A., Disanza A., Romano P., Ponzanelli I., Iannolo G., et al. The eps8 family of proteins links growth factor stimulation to actin reorganization generating functional redundancy in the Ras/Rac pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 15 (2004) 91-98
8. Mongiovi A.M., Romano P.R., Panni S., Mendoza M., Wong W.T., Musacchio A., et al. A novel peptide-SH3 interaction. EMBO J. 18 (1999) 5300-5309
9. Kesti T., Ruppelt A., Wang J.H., Liss M., Wagner R., Taskén K., and Saksela K. Reciprocal regulation of SH3 and SH2 domain binding via tyrosine phosphorylation of a common site in CD3epsilon. J. Immunol. 179 (2007) 878-885
10. Herrmann T., Guntert P., and Wüthrich K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 319 (2002) 209-227
11. 13C chemical shift statistics. J. Biomol. NMR 24 (2002) 149-154
12. Kishan K.V.R., Scita G., Wong W.T., Di Fiore P.P., and Newcomer M.E. The SH3 domain of Eps8 exists as a novel intertwined dimer. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4 (1997) 739-743
13. Würtz P., Aitio O., Hellman M., and Permi P. Simultaneous detection of amide and methyl correlations using a time shared NMR experiment: application to epitope mapping. J. Biomol. NMR 39 (2007) 97-105
14. 2O. J. Magn. Reson. B 102 (1993) 317-321
15. Breeze A.L. Isotope-filtered NMR methods for the study of biomolecular structure and interactions. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 36 (2000) 323-372
16. Feng S., Kasahara C., Rickles R.J., and Schreiber S.T. Specific interactions outside the proline-rich core of two classes of Src homology 3 ligands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995) 12408-12415
17. Arold S., Franken P., Strub M.P., Hoh F., Benichou S., Benarous R., and Dumas C. The crystal structure of HIV-1 Nef protein bound to the Fyn kinase SH3 domain suggests a role for this complex in altered T cell receptor signaling. Structure 5 (1997) 1361-1372
18. Mayer B.J., and Eck M.J. SH3 domain. Minding your p's and q's. Curr. Biol. 5 (1995) 364-367
19. Kay B.K., Williamson M.P., and Sudol M. The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J. 14 (2000) 231-241
20. Feng S., Chen J.K., Hongtao Y., Simon J.A., and Schreiber S.L. Two binding orientations for peptides to the Src SH3 domain: development of a general model for SH3-ligand interactions. Science 266 (1994) 1241-1247
21. Cesareni G., Panni S., Nardelli G., and Castagnoli L. Can we infer peptide recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains?. FEBS Lett. 513 (2002) 38-44
22. 13C-labeled proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 124 (1997) 274-278
23. Permi P. Intraresidual HNCA: an experiment for correlating only intraresidual backbone resonances. J. Biomol. NMR 23 (2002) 201-209
24. Tossavainen H., and Permi P. Optimal pathway selection in intra-residual triple-resonance experiments. J. Magn. Reson. 170 (2004) 244-251
25. Sattler M., Schleucher J., and Griesinger C. Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 34 (1999) 93-158
26. Permi P., and Annila A. Coherence transfer in proteins. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 44 (2004) 97-137
27. 13C labeling. Biochemistry 28 (1989) 7510-7516
28. 13C labeling. FEBS Lett. 249 (1989) 113-118
29. 15N resonance assignments of the N-terminal SH3 domain of drk in folded and unfolded states using enhanced-sensitivity pulsed field gradient NMR techniques. J. Biomol. NMR 39 (1994) 97-105
30. Case D.A., Cheatham III T.E., Darden T., Gohlke H., Luo R., Merz Jr. K.M., et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 26 (2005) 1668-1688
31. Laskowski R.A., Rullmannn J.A., MacArthur M.W., Kaptein R., and Thornton J.M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8 (1996) 477-486