Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 103, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 2068-2074

  Cornett, Daniel ^a   Barancin, Courtney ^a   Roeder, Brent ^a   Reichelderfer, Mark ^a   Frick, Terrance ^a   Gopal, Deepak ^a   Kim, David ^a   Pickhardt, Perry J ^a   Taylor, Andrew ^a   Pfau, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COLON DILATATION; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATHOLOGY; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOID TUMOR; COHORT STUDIES; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 49349097361     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01919.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechtold RE, et al. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality [Abstract]. Am J Roentgenol 1994 162 (Suppl s104.
2. Dachman AH, Yoshida H. Virtual colonoscopy: Past, present, and future. Radiol Clin North Am 2003 41 : 377 93.
3. Coin CG, inventor Bond WC, Stafford TP, assignees. Computed tomographic colonoscopy. United States patent 5458111. October 17, 1995.
4. Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V, et al. Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: Applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology 1996 199 : 321 30.
5. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: Feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology 1996 110 284 90.
6. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: Two-versus three dimensional techniques: Work in progress. Radiology 1996 200 : 49 54.
7. Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, et al. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: Two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR 1997 169 : 1237 42.
8. Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening in the unscreened population in the United States Gastroenterology 2004 127 : 1661 69.
9. Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: Assessment of risk in amulticenter cohort. Radiology 2006 239 : 457 63.
10. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT Colography: Initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 1997 205 : 59 65.
11. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, et al. A comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999 341 : 1496 503.
12. Pickhardt, PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003 349 23 : 2191 200.
13. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004 291 : 1713 9.
14. Rockey DC, Paulsen EK, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: Prospective comparison. Lancet 2005 365 : 305 11.
15. Pickhardt PJ. Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). RadioGraphics 2004 24 : 1535 56.
16. Pickhardt PJ. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): Comparison of three commercially available systems. AJR 2003 181 : 1599 606.
17. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004 127 : 1623 32.
18. Pickhardt PJ. CT colonography without catharsis: The ultimate study or useful additional option Gastroenterology 2005 128 : 521 2
19. Van Rijn JC, Reisma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: A systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 : 343 50.
20. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997 112 : 24 8.
21. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1991 37 : 125 7.
22. Mataushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K, et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without a cap. Endoscopy 1998 30 : 444 7.
23. Rex DK, Chalalawada V, Helper DJ, et al. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: Impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 : 2000 5.
24. Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 : 519 22.
25. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of missed adenomas by optical colonoscopy. Ann Int Med 2004 141 : 352 60.
26. Jass JR. Hyperplastic polyps of the colorectum-innocent or guilty Dis Colon Rectum 2001 44 : 163 6.
27. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl MP, et al. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 4 : 343 8.
28. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, et al. Flat colorectal lesions in symptomatic adults: Implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR 2004 183 : 1343 47.
29. Stanford MF, Pickhardt PJ. Diagnostic performance of primary 3-dimensional computed tomography colonography in the setting of colonic diverticular disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 4 : 1039 47.