Re-innovation: The construct, measurement, and validation

Technovation

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 658-666

  Cheng, Chi Jyun ^a   Shiu, Eric C C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Construct; Innovation; Re innovation; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; RHENIUM; TESTING;

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES; CONSTRUCT; FUTURE RESEARCH; INNOVATION; INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS; LITTLE RESEARCH; RE-INNOVATION; REDUCED COSTS; RELIABILITY MEASURES; TAIWAN; VALIDITY TESTS;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 49349091371     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson J.C., and Gerbing D. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 3 (1988) 411-423
2. Bagozzi R., and Yi Y. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 14 3 (1988) 74-94
3. Bagozzi R., Yi Y., and Phillips L. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (1991) 42-458
4. Bentler P.M., and Wu E. EQS/Windows user's Guide (1983), BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles
5. Chang P., Hsu C., and Tsai C. A stage approach for industrial technology development and implementation-the case of Taiwan's computer industry. Technovation 19 (1999) 233-241
6. Cheng, C., Shiu, E., 2006. Re-innovation-What is it and what could influence its performance?, Conference Paper no. 254, Academy of Marketing Conference, London, UK.
7. Cheng, C., Shiu, E., forthcoming. Preconditions for product re-innovation in Taiwan: evidence from high-technology firms. Asia Pacific Business Review.
8. Churchill Jr. G.A. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing research 16 (1979) 64-73
9. Churchill Jr. G.A. Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. 6th ed (1995), The Dryden Press, Chicago
10. Cooper R.G., and Kleinschmidt E. Success factors in product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 16 3 (1987) 215-233
11. Fornell C., and Larcker F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of marketing Research 18 1 (1981) 39-50
12. Garcia R., and Calantone R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19 2 (2002) 110-132
13. Gatignon H., Tushman M., Smith W., and Anderson P. A structural approach to assessing innovation: construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Science 48 (2002) 1103-1122
14. Govindarajan V., and Kopalle P. Disruptiveness of Innovations: Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal 27 2 (2006) 189-199
15. Hair J., Black W., Babin W., Anderson R., and Tatham R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed (2006), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
16. Joreskog K.G., and Sorbom D. Testing structural equation models. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing Structural Equation Models (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
17. Joreskog K.G., and Sorbom D. LISREL 7: A Guide to the program and applications (1989), SPSS Inc, Chicago
18. Lau, L.J., 1994. The Competitive Advantage of Taiwan. Journal of Far Eastern Business, Autumn.
19. Mac R.C., Browne M., and Sugawara H. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological methods 1 (1996) 130-149
20. Madanmohan T. Incremental Technical Innovations and their Determinants. International Journal of Innovation Management 9 4 (2005) 481-510
21. Mudrak T., van Wagenberg A., and Wubben E. Innovation Process and Innovativeness in Facility Management Organizations. Facilities 23 3/4 (2005) 103-118
22. Netermeyer R., Johnston M., and Burton S. Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equation framework. Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (1990) 148-157
23. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York
24. O'Connor G., and DeMartino R. Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management System in Large Established Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 6 (2006) 475-497
25. Panne G., Beers C., and Kleinknecht A. Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review. International Journal of Innovation management 7 3 (2003) 309-388
26. Peter J.P. Construct validity: a review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research 18 2 (1981) 133-145
27. Riel A., Lemmink J., and Ouwersloot H. High-technology service innovation success: A decision-making perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21 5 (2004) 348-359
28. Rothwell R., and Gardiner P. Invention, Innovation, Re-innovation and the Role of the User: A Case Study of British Hovercraft Development. Technovation 3 (1985) 167-186
29. Rothwell R., and Gardiner P. Re-innovation and robust designs: producer and user benefits. Journal of Marketing Management 3 3 (1988) 372-389
30. Rothwell R., and Gardiner P. The strategic management of re-innovation. Research and Development Management 19 2 (1989) 147-159
31. Saunders M., Lewis P., and Thornhill A. Research Methods for Business Students (1997), Pitman Publishing, London
32. Simsek Z., and Veiga J. A primer on internet organizational survey. Organization Research Methods 4 3 (2001) 218-235
33. Song S.M., and Parry M.E. What Separates Japanese New Product Winners from Losers. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 5 (1996) 422-439
34. Song S.M., and Montoya-Weiss M. Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15 2 (1998) 124-135
35. Stanton J.M. An Empirical Assessment of Data Collection Using the Internet. Personnel Psychology 51 (1998) 709-725
36. Whyte J. Innovation and users: virtual reality in the construction sector. Construction Management and Economics 21 (2003) 565-572