Has the internet changed everything or nothing? Thoughts on examining and using emerging technologies in adolescent health research

Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 305-324

  Borzekowski, Dina L G ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; PATIENT SELECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 49249132989     PISSN: 19344287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Roberts DF, Foehr UG, Rideout V. Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-Olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2005. Available at: www.kff.org/entmedia/7251.cfm. Accessed June 1, 2007
2. Lenhart A, Madden M, Hitlin P. Pew Internet & American Life Project: teens and technologyyouth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Available at: www.pewin-ternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Teens.Tech-July2005web.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2005
3. Bridge Ratings. Youth spending more time with cell phones and MP3 players. Available at: www.bridgeratings.com. Accessed March 19, 2007
4. Martha C, Griffet J. Brief report: how do adolescents perceive the risks related to cell-phone use? J Adolesc. 2007;30:513-521
5. Lajunen HR, Keski-Rahkonen A, Pulkkinen L, Rose RJ, Rissanen A, Kaprio J. Are computer and cell phone use associated with body mass index and overweight? A population study among twin adolescents. BMC Public Health, 2007;7:24
6. Jung JY, Kim YC, Lin WY, Cheong PH. The influence of social environment on Internet connectedness of adolescents in Seoul, Singapore and Taipai. New Media and Soc. 2005;7: 64-88
7. Borzekowski DLG, Fobil JN, Asante KO. Online access by adolescents in Accra: Ghanaian teens' use of the Internet for health information. Dev Psychol. 2006;42:450-458
8. Ybarra ML, Kiwanuka J, Emenyonu N, Bangsberg DR. Internet use among Ugandan adolescents: implications for HIV intervention. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e433. Available at: http://medicin-e.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get- document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030433
9. Foehr UG. Media Multitasking Among American Youth: Prevalence, Predictors and Pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2006. Available at: www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7592.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2007
10. Lenhart A, Madden. Social networking Web sites and teens: an overview. Pew Internet Project Data Memo. Available at: www.pewintemet.org/pdfs/PIP-SNS- Data-Memo-Jan-2007.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2007
11. Arunachalam S. Assuring quality and relevance of Internet information in the real world. BMJ. 1998;317:1501-1502
12. Borzekowski DLG, Rickert VI. Adolescents, the Internet and health: issues of access and content J Appl Dev Psychol. 2001;22:49-59
13. Borzekowski DLG, Rickert VI. Adolescent cybersurfing for health information: a new resource that crosses barriers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:813-817
14. Rideout V. Generation rx.com: How Young People Use the Internet for Health Information. Washington, DC: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2001
15. Robinson Thomas N, Borzekowski, Dina LG. Effects of the SMART classroom curriculum to reduce child and family media use. J Commun. 2006;56:1-26
16. Borzekowski DLG, Robinson TN. The remote, the mouse, and the no.2 pencil: The household media environment and academic achievement among third grade students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:607-613
17. Roberts DF, Foehr UG. Kids and Media in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2004
18. Singer DG, Singer JL, eds. Handbook of Children and the Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000
19. Subrahmanyam K, Kraut R, Greenfield PM, Gross EF. New forms of electronic media: The impact of interactive games and the Internet on cognition, socialization, and behavior. In: Singer DL, Singer JL, eds. Handbook of Children and the Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001: 73-99
20. Gross EF. Adolescent Internet use: what we expect, what teens report Appl Dev Psychol. 2004;25:633-649
21. Turow J. The Internet and the Family: The View From the Family, the View From the Press. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg Public Policy Center; 1999
22. Boyer EW, Shannon M, Hibberd P. The Internet and psychoactive substance use among adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005;115:302-305
23. Boyer EW, Lapen PT, Macalino G, Hibberd P. Dissemination of psychoactive substance information by innovative drug users. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007; 10:1089
24. Wilson JL, Peebles R, Hardy KK, Litt IF. Surfing for thinness: a pilot study of pro-eating disorder Web site usage in adolescents with eating disorders. Pediatrics. 2006:118(6). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/ content/full/118/6/el635
25. Whitlock JL, Powers JL, Eckenrode J. The virtual cutting edge: The Internet and adolescent self-injury. Dev Psychol. 2006;42:407-417
26. Jacobson CM, Gould M. The epidemiology and phenomenology of non-suicidal self-injurious behavior among adolescents: a critical review of the literature. Arch Suicide Res. 2007;11:129-147
27. Lapinski MK. StarvingforPerfect.com: a theoretically based content analysis of pro-eating disorder Web sites. Health Commun. 2006;20:243-253
28. Witte K. Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Commun Monogr. 1992;61:113-134
29. Bleakley A, Merzel CR, VanDevanter NL, Messeri P. Computer access and Internet use among urban youths. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:744-746
30. Yang CK, Choe BM, Baity M, Lee JH, Cho JS. SCL-90-R and 16PF profiles of senior high school students with excessive Internet use. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50:407-414
31. Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J. The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet Youth Soc. 2003;34:330-358
32. Wolak J, Mitchell K, Finkelhor D. Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a national sample of youth Internet users. Pediatrics. 2007;119:247-257
33. Eppright T, Allwood M, Stern B, Theiss T. Internet addiction: a new type of addiction? Mo Med. 1999;96:133-136
34. Young KS, Rodgers RC. The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1:25-28
35. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/118/4/ell69
36. Woodruff SI, Conway TL, Edwards CC, Elliott SP, Crittenden J. Evaluation of an Internet virtual world chat room for adolescent smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2006; In press
37. Runge C, Lecheler J, Horn M, Tews JT, Schaefer M. Outcomes of a Web-based patient education program for asthmatic children and adolescents. Chest. 2006;129:581-593
38. Williamson DA, Walden HM, White MA, et al. Two-year Internet-based randomized controlled trial for weight loss in African American girls. Obesity. 2006;14:1231-1243
39. Puccio JA, Belzer M, Olson J, et al. The use of cell phone reminder calls for assisting HIV-infected adolescents and young adults to adhere to highly active antiretroviral therapy: a pilot study. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006;20:438-444
40. Gribble JN, Miller HG, Rogers SM, Turner CE. Interviews mode and measurement of sexual behaviors: methodological issues. J Sex Res. 1999;36:16-24
41. Romer D, Hornik R, Stanton B, et al. "Talking" computers: a reliable and private method to conduct interviews on sensitive topics with children. J Sex Res. 1997;34:3-9
42. Trapl ES, Borawski EA, Stork PP, et al. Use of audio-enhanced personal digital assistants for school-based data collection. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37:296-305
43. Koo M, Skinner H. Challenges of Internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e6. Available at: www.jmir.org/2005/1/e6
44. Gordon JS, Akers L, Severson HH, Danaher BG, Boles SM. Successful participant recruitment strategies for an online smokeless tobacco cessation program. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8(suppl 1):S35-S41
45. Obermayer JL, Riley WT, Asif O, Jean-Mary J.. College smoking-cessation using cell phone text messaging. JAm Coll Health. 2004;53:71-78
46. Bersamin M, Paschall MJ, Feamow-Kenney M, Wyrick D. Effectiveness of a Web-based alcohol-misuse and harm-prevention course among high- and low-risk students. J Am Coll Health. 2007;55:247-254
47. Lou C, Zhao Q, Gao E, Shah IH. Can the Internet be used effectively to provide sex education to young people in China? J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:720-728
48. Gilbert LK, Temby JRE, Rogers SE. Evaluating a teen STD prevention Web site. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37:236-242
49. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet: principles governing AMA Websites. JAMA. 2000;283:1600-1601
50. Childress CA, Asamen JK. The emerging relationship of psychology and the Internet: proposed guidelines for conducting Internet intervention research. Ethics Behav. 1998;8:19-35
51. Buchanan T, Smith JL. Research on the Internet: validation of a World-Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999;31:565-571
52. Fortson BL, Scotti JR, Del Ben KS, Chen YC. Reliability and validity of an Internet traumatic stress survey with a college student sample. J Trauma Stress. 2006;19:709-720
53. Raat H, Mangunkusumo RT, Landgraf JM, Kloek G, Brug J. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of ad health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire Child Form (CHQ-CF): Internet administration compared with the standard paper version. Qual Life Res. 2007; 16:675-685
54. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the Internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:e10. Available at: www.jmir.org/2006/2/e10
55. Bull SS, McFarlane M, King D. Barriers to STD/HIV prevention on the Internet. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:661-670