Fast modal sounds with scalable frequency-domain synthesis

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Bonneel, Nicolas ^a   Drettakis, George ^a   Tsingos, Nicolas ^a   Viaud Delmon, Isabelle ^b   James, Doug ^c  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b CNRS UMR 7593 Vulnerabilite Adaptation et Psychopathologie   (France)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology

Author keywords

Modal synthesis; Physically based animation; Real time audio rendering; Sound synthesis

Indexed keywords

AUDIO PROCESSING; AUDIO RENDERING; AUDITORY MASKING; FAST MODE; FOURIER DOMAINS; FREQUENCY DOMAINS; FREQUENCY-DOMAIN SYNTHESIS; HIGH-QUALITY; IMPACT SOUND; INTERACTIVE 3D; MODAL SYNTHESIS; PHYSICALLY BASED ANIMATION; REAL TIME; REAL-TIME AUDIO RENDERING; SHORT-TIME FOURIER TRANFORMS; SOUND SOURCES; SOUND SYNTHESIS; TEST SCENES; TIME-DOMAIN SOLUTIONS; TO EFFECT; USER EVALUATIONS;

ACOUSTIC WAVES; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPLEXATION; DEBRIS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; PIPELINE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PIPELINES; SULFATE MINERALS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

EID: 49249131456     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1360612.1360623     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ALAIS, D., AND CARLILE, S. 2005. Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102, 6, 2244-7.
2. BEOAULT, D. 1999. Auditory and non-auditory factors that potentially influence virtual acoustic imagery. In Proc. AES 16th Int. Conf. on Spatial Sound Reproduction, 13-26.
3. FUJISAKI, W., SHIMOJO, S., KASHINO, M., AND NISHIDA, S. 2004. Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nature Neuroscience 7, 7, 773-8.
4. GUSKI, R., AND TROJE, N. 2003. Audiovisual phenomenal causality. Perception and Psychophysics 65, 5, 789-800.
5. HORMANDER, L. 1983. The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I. Springer-Verlag.
6. HOWELL, D. C. 1992. Statistical Methods for Psychology. PWSKent.
7. ITU. 2001-2003. Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems, rec. ITU-R BS. 1534-1, http://www.itu.int/.
8. JAMES, D. L., BARBIC, J., AND PAI, D. K. 2006. Precomputed acoustic transfer: Output-sensitive, accurate sound generation for geometrically complex vibration sources. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ACM SIGGRAPH) 25, 3 (July), 987-995.
9. LARSSON, P., VÄSTFJÄLL, D., AND KLEINER, M. 2002. Better presence and performance in virtual environments by improved binaural sound rendering. Proc AES 22nd Intl. Conf. on virtual, synthetic and entertainment audio (June), 31-38.
10. MOECK, T., BONNEEL, N., TSINGOS, N., DRETTAKIS, G., VIAUD-DELMON, I., AND ALOZA, D. 2007. Progressive perceptual audio rendering of complex scenes. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symp. on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games (I3D), 189-196.
11. O'BRIEN, J. F., SHEN, C., AND GATCHALIAN, C. M. 2002. Synthesizing sounds from rigid-body simulations. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symp. on Computer Animation, 175-181.
12. OPPENHEIM, A. V., SCHAFER, R. W., AND BUCK, J. R. 1999. Discrete-Time Signal Processing (2nd edition). Prentice-Hall.
13. PAI, D. K., VAN DEN DOEL, K., JAMES, D. L., LANG, J., LLOYD, J. E., RICHMOND, J. L., AND YAU, S. H. 2001. Scanning physical interaction behavior of 3d objects. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 2007, 87-96.
14. PRESS, W. H., TEUKOLSKY, S. A., VETTERLING, W. T., AND FLANNERY, B. P. 1992. Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press.
15. RAGHUVANSHI, N., AND LIN, M. C. 2006. Interactive sound synthesis for large scale environments. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symp. on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games (I3D), 101-108.
16. RODET, X., AND DEPALLE, P. 1992. Spectral envelopes and inverse FFT synthesis. In Proc. 93rd Conv. AES, San Francisco.
17. SEKULER, R., SEKULER, A. B., AND LAU, R. 1997. Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385, 6614, 308.
18. SUGITA, Y., AND SUZUKI, Y. 2003. Audiovisual perception: Implicit estimation of sound-arrival time. Nature 421, 6926, 911.
19. TSINGOS, N., GALLO, E., AND DRETTAKIS, G. 2004. Perceptual audio rendering of complex virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ACM SIGGRAPH) 23, 3 (July), 249-258.
20. TSINGOS, N. 2005. Scalable perceptual mixing and filtering of audio signals using an augmented spectral representation. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects, 277-282.
21. VAN DEN DOEL, K., AND PAI, D. K. 1998. The sounds of physical shapes. Presence 7, 4, 382-395.
22. VAN DEN DOEL, K., AND PAI, D. K. 2003. Modal synthesis for vibrating objects. Audio Anecdotes.
23. VAN DEN DOEL, K., KRY, P. G., AND PAI, D. K. 2001, FoleyAutomatic: Physically-based sound effects for interactive simulation and animation. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 2001, 537-544.
24. VAN DEN DOEL, K., PAI, D. K., ADAM, T., KORTCHMAR, L., AND PICHORA-FULLER, K. 2002. Measurements of perceptual quality of contact sound models. Intl. Conf on Auditory Display, (ICAD), 345-349.
25. VAN DEN DOEL, K., KNOTT, D., AND PAI, D. K. 2004. Interactive simulation of complex audiovisual scenes. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 1, 99-111.
26. ZÖLZER, U. 2002. Digital Audio Effects (DAFX), chapter 8. Wiley.