When does ecosystem engineering cause invasion and species replacement?

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1247-1257

  Gonzalez, Andrew ^a   Lambert, Amaury ^b   Ricciardi, Anthony ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; DOMINANCE; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERING; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; NATURAL ENEMY;

EID: 49249118855     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16419.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Altman, S. Whitlatch, R. B. 2007. Effects of small-scale disturbance on invasion success in marine communities J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 342:15 29.
2. Anderson, J. M. 1950. Some aquatic vegetation changes following fish removal J. Wildlife Manage. 14:206 209.
3. Aplet, G. H. et al. 1991. Association between feral pig disturbance and the composition of some alien plant assemblages in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Vegetatio 95:55 62.
4. Bais, H. P. et al. 2003. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: from molecules and genes to species interactions Science 301:1377 1380.
5. Berkman, P. A. et al. 1998. Zebra mussels invade Lake Erie muds Nature 393:27 28.
6. Brooks, M. L. et al. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes BioScience 54:677 688.
7. Callaway, R. M. et al. 2004. Soil biota and exotic plant invasion Nature 427:731 733.
8. Colautti, R. I. et al. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7:721 733.
9. Creed, R. P. 1998. A biogeographic perspective on Eurasian milfoil declines: additional evidence for the role of herbivorous weevils in promoting declines? J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 36:16 22.
10. Crooks, J. A. 2002. Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers Oikos 97:153 166.
11. Crooks, J. A. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion Ecoscience 12:316 329.
12. Crooks, J. A. Soulé, M. E. 1999. Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications Sandlund, O. T. Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer 103 125.
13. Cuddington, K. Hastings, A. 2004. Invasive engineers Ecol. Modell. 178:335 347.
14. Cuddington, K. et al. 2007. Ecosystem engineers. Academic Press.
15. D'Antonio, C. M. Vitousek, P. M. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:63 87.
16. Davis, M. A. et al. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility J. Ecol. 88:528 534.
17. Duda, J. J. et al. 2003. Differences in native soil ecology associated with invasion of the exotic annual chenopod, Halogeton glomeratus. Biol. Fertility Soils 38:72 77.
18. Ervin, G. N. Wetzel, R. G. 2003. An ecological perspective of allelochemical interference in land-water interface communities Plant Soil 256:13 28.
19. Gido, K. B. Brown, J. H. 1999. Invasion of North American drainages by alien fish species Freshwater Biol. 42:387 399.
20. Gurney, W. S. C. Lawton, J. H. 1996. The population dynamics of ecosystem engineers Oikos 76:273 283.
21. Gutiérrez, J. L. et al. 2003. Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats Oikos 101:79 90.
22. Hastings, A. et al. 2007. Ecosystem engineering in space and time Ecol. Lett. 10:153 164.
23. Hänfling, B. Kollman, J. 2002. An evolutionary perspective of biological invasions Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:545 546.
24. Hierro, J. L. et al. 2006. Disturbance facilitates invasion: the effects are stronger abroad than at home Am. Nat. 167:144 156.
25. Jones, C. G. et al. 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers Ecology 78:1946 1957.
26. Jones, R. C. et al. 1983. Phytoplankton as a factor in the decline of the submersed macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum L. in Lake Wingra, Wisconsin, USA Hydrobiologia 107:213 219.
27. Keane, R. M. Crawley, M. J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:164 170.
28. Kourtev, P. S. et al. 2002. Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil Ecology 83:3152 3166.
29. Ligon, J. D. Stacey, P. B. 1996. Land use, lag times and the detection of demographic change: the case of the acorn woodpecker Conserv. Biol. 10:840 846.
30. Link, S. O. et al. 2006. Bromus tectorum cover mapping and fire risk Int. J. Wildland Fire 15:113 119.
31. Lockwood, J. L. et al. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:223 228.
32. Lougheed, V. L. et al. 1998. Predictions on the effect of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exclusion on water quality, zooplankton, and submergent macrophytes in a Great Lakes wetland Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55:1189 1197.
33. Lougheed, V. L. et al. 2004. Carp exclusion, food-web interactions and the restoration of Cootes Paradise Marsh J. Great Lakes Res. 30:44 57.
34. Mack, M. C. D'Antonio, C. M. 1998. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:195 198.
35. Mortl, M. Rothhaupt, K. O. 2003. Effects of adult Dreissena polymorpha on settling juveniles and associated macroinvertebrates Int. J. Hydrobiol. 88:561 569.
36. Myers, J. H. et al. 2000. Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:316 320.
37. Ntiba, M. J. et al. 2001. Management issues in the Lake Victoria watershed Lake Reserv. Manage. 6:211 216.
38. Odling-Smee, F. J. et al. 2003. Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton Univ. Press.
39. Pipalova, I. 2002. Initial impact of low stocking density of grass carp on aquatic macrophytes Aquat. Bot. 73:9 18.
40. Ramcharan, C. W. et al. 1992. A multivariate model for predicting population fluctuations of Dreissena polymorpha in North American lakes Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49:150 158.
41. Ricciardi, A. 2003. Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions Freshwater Biol. 48:972 981.
42. Ricciardi, A. et al. 1995. Predicting the intensity and impact of Dreissena infestation on native unionid bivalves from Dreissena field density Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52:1449 1461.
43. Ricciardi, A. et al. 1996. Impact of the Dreissena invasion on native unionid bivalves in the upper St. Lawrence River Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53:1434 1444.
44. Richardson, D. M. et al. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions Div. Distr. 6:93 107.
45. Richardson, M. J. 1996. Factors limiting the colonization success of an introduced exotic fish (Carassius auratus) PhD thesis. - McGill Univ., Montreal.
46. Richardson, M. J. Whoriskey, F. G. 1992. Factors influencing the production of turbidity by goldfish (Carassius auratus) Can. J. Zool. 70:1585 1589.
47. Richardson, M. J. et al. 1995. Turbidity generation and biological impacts of an exotic fish Carassius auratus, introduced into shallow seasonally anoxic ponds J. Fish Biol. 47:576 585.
48. Sax, D. F. Brown, J. H. 2000. The paradox of invasion Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 9:363 371.
49. Sax, D. F. et al. 2002. Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds Am. Nat. 160:766 783.
50. Scheffer, M. et al. 2003. Floating plant dominance as a stable state Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100:4040 4045.
51. Shigesada, N. Kawasaki, K. 1997. Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford Univ. Press.
52. Simberloff, D. Gibbons, L. 2004. Now you see them, now you don't! - population crashes of established introduced species Biol. Invas. 6:161 172.
53. Strayer, D. L. Malcom, H. M. 2007. Shell decay rates of native and alien freshwater bivalves and implications for habitat engineering Freshwater Biol. 52:1611 1617.
54. Talley, T. S. Levin, L. A. 2001. Modification of sediments and macrofauna by an invasive marsh plant Biol. Invas. 3:51 68.
55. Taylor, C. M. Hastings, A. 2005. Allee effects in biological invasions Ecol. Lett. 8:895 908.
56. van den Brink, F. W. B. et al. 1993. Ecological aspects, explosive range extension and impact of a mass invader, Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Crustacea: Amphipoda), in the lower Rhine (the Netherlands) Oecologia 93:224 232.
57. van der Velde, G. et al. 1994. Decline of zebra mussel populations in the Rhine: competition between two mass invaders (Dreissena polymorpha and Corophium curvispinum) Naturwissenschaften 81:32 34.
58. Vanderploeg, H. A. et al. 2002. Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Pont-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59:1209 1228.
59. Veltman, C. J. et al. 1996. Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds Am. Nat. 147:542 557.
60. Vilá, M. Weiner, J. 2004. Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species - evidence from pair-wise experiments Oikos 105:229 238.
61. Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies Oikos 57:7 13.
62. Vitousek, P. M. et al. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change N. Z. J. Ecol. 21:1 16.
63. Vivrette, N. J. Muller, C. H. 1977. Mechanism of invasion and dominance of coastal grassland by Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Ecol. Monogr. 47:301 318.
64. Yang, S. Y. et al. 1992. Isolation and identification of antialgal compounds in root system of water hyacinth Acta Phytophysiol. Sin. 18:399 402.
65. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall.
66. Zambrano, L. et al. 1999. Impact of introduced carp (Cyprinus carpio) in subtropical shallow ponds in Central Mexico J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recovery 6:281 288.