Effects of biofouling on performance of moored data logging acoustic receivers

Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 327-335

  Heupel, Michelle R ^a   Reiss, Katie L ^b   Yeiser, Beau G ^a   Simpfendorfer, Colin A ^c  

^a CENTER FOR SHARK RESEARCH   (United States)

^b WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNELIDA; ASCIDIACEA; THORACICA; UROCHORDATA;

EID: 49249094984     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15415856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2008.6.327     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Afsar, A., R. De Nys, and P. Steinberg. 2003. The effects of foulrelease coatings on the settlement and behaviour of cyprid larvae of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite amphitrite Darwin. Biofouling 19:105-110.
2. Callow, M. E., and J. A. Callow. 2002. Marine biofouling: a sticky problem. Biologist 49:1-5.
3. Clare, A. S. 1998. Towards nontoxic antifouling. J. Mar. Biotechnol. 6:3-6.
4. Clements, S., D. Jepsen, M. Karnowski, and C. B. Schreck. 2005. Optimization of an acoustic telemetry array for detecting transmitter-implanted fish. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 25:429-436.
5. Domeier, M. L. 2005. Methods for the deployment and maintenance of an acoustic tag tracking array: An example from California's Channel Islands. Mar. Tech. Soc. J. 39:74-80.
6. Finstad, B., F. Økland, E. B. Thorstad, P. A. Bjørn, and R. S. McKinley. 2005. Migration of hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon and wild anadromous brown trout post-smolts in a Norwegian fjord system. J. Fish Biol. 66:86-96.
7. Fitzgerald, J. W., M. E. Davis, and B. G. Hurdle. 1947. Some acoustic properties of marine fouling. J. Acoustic. Soc. 19:332-337.
8. Heupel, M. R., J. M. Semmens, and A. J. Hobday. 2006. Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays. Mar. Freshw. Res. 57:1-13.
9. Klimley A. P., F. Voegeli, S. C. Beavers, and B. J. Le Boeuf. 1998. Automated listening stations for tagged marine fish. Mar. Tech. Soc. J. 32:94-101.
10. Lacroix, G. L., and F. A. Voegeli. 2000. Development of automated monitoring systems for ultrasonic transmitters, pp. 37-50. In A. Moore and I. Russell [eds.], Advances in Fish Telemetry. Lowestoft: CEFAS.
11. Lacroix, G. L., F. A. Voegeli, and A. B. Collins. 2008. Variation in the performance of acoustic receivers and its implication for positioning algorithms in a riverine setting. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65:482-492.
12. Thorstad, E. B., F. Okland, D. Rowsell, and R. S. McKinley. 2000. A system for automated recording of fish tagged with acoustic transmitters. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 7:281-294.
13. Voegeli, F. A., and D. G. Pincock. 1996. Overview of underwater acoustics as it applies to telemetry, pp. 23-30. In E. Baras and J.C. Philippart [eds.], Underwater Biotelemetry. Univ. of Liege.
14. Voegeli, F. A., G. L. Lacroix, and J. M. Anderson. 1998. Development of miniature pingers for tracking Atlantic salmon smolts at sea. Hydrobiologia 371-372:35-46.
15. Voegeli, F. A., M. J. Smale, D. M. Webber, Y. Andrade, and R. K. O'Dor. 2001. Ultrasonic telemetry, tracking and automated monitoring technology for sharks. Environ. Biol. Fish. 60:267-281.