Variation in the performance of acoustic receivers and its implication for positioning algorithms in a riverine setting

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 482-492

  Simpfendorfer, Colin Ashley ^a,c   Heupel, Michelle RaNae ^a,c   Collins, Angela B ^a,b,d  

^a CENTER FOR SHARK RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SHARK;

CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; CARCHARHINUS LEUCAS; CHONDRICHTHYES; RHINOPTERA BONASUS; RHINOPTERINAE;

EID: 40849097542     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F07-180     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Burrell, K.H., Iselv, J.J., Bunnell, D.B., Van Lear, D.H., and Dolloff, C.A. 2005. Seasonal movement of brown trout in a southern Appalachian river. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 129: 1373-1379.
2. Clement, S., Jepsen, D., Karnowski, M., and Schreck, C.B. 2005. Optimization of an acoustic telemetry array for detecting transmitter-implanted fish. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 25: 429-436.
3. Heupel, M.R., and Hueter, R.E. 2001. Use of a remote acoustic telemetry system to monitor shark movements in a coastal nursery area. In Electronic tagging and tracking in marine fisheries. Edited by J.R. Sibert and J.L. Nielsen. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. pp. 217-236.
4. Heupel, M.R., Simpfendorfer, C.A., and Lowe, C.G. 2005. Passive acoustic telemetry technology: current applications and future directions. Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Fla. Tech. Rep. No. 1066. pp. 1-98.
5. Heupel, M.R., Semmens, J.M., and Hobday, A.J. 2006. Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays. Mar. Freshw. Res. 57: 1-13.
6. Klimley, A.P., and Holloway, C.F. 1999. School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar. Biol. 133: 307-317.
7. Klimley, A.P., Voegeli, F., Beavers, S.C., and Le Boeuf, B.J. 1998. Automated listening stations for tagged marine fishes. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 32: 94-101.
8. Lacroix, G.L., and Voegeli, F.A. 2000. Development of automated monitoring systems for ultrasonic transmitters. In Advances in fish telemetry. Edited by A. Moore and I. Russell. CEFAS, Suffolk, UK. pp. 37-50.
9. Lacroix, G.L., Knox, D., and Stokesbury, M.J.W. 2005. Survival and behaviour of post-smolt Atlantic salmon in coastal habitat with extreme tides. J. Fish Biol. 66: 485-498.
10. Lowe, C.G., Topping, D.T., Cartamil, D.P., and Papastamatiou, Y.P. 2003. Movement patterns, home range, and habitat utilization of adult kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus in a temperate no-take marine reserve. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 256: 205-216.
11. Simpfendorfer, C.A., Heupel, M.R., and Hueter, R.E. 2002. Estimation of short-term centers of activity from an array of omnidirectional hydrophones and its use in studying animal movements. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 23-32.
12. SFWMD. 2000. Caloosahatchee water management plan. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Fla.
13. Thorstad, E.B., Økland, F., Rowsell, D., and McKinley, R.S. 2000. A system for automatic recording of fish tagged with coded acoustic transmitters. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 7: 281-294.
14. Voegeli, F.A., and Pincock, D.G. 1996. Overview of underwater acoustics as it applies to telemetry. In Underwater biotelemetry. Edited by E. Baras and J.C. Philippart. University of Liege, Belgium. pp. 23-30.
15. Voegeli, F.A., Lacroix, G.L., and Anderson, J.M. 1998. Development of miniature pingers for tracking Atlantic salmon smolts at sea. Hydrobiologia, 371-372: 35-46.