Integration of conventional cytogenetics, comparative genomic hybridisation and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the detection of genomic rearrangements in acute leukaemia

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 903-908

  McGrattan, Peter ^a   Campbell, S ^b   Cuthbert, R ^a   Jones, F G C ^a   McMullin, M F ^a   Humphreys, M ^a  

^a BELFAST CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

ACUTE GRANULOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD CELL; BONE MARROW CELL; CHILD; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME G BAND; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INTERPHASE; KARYOTYPE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME BANDING; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; GENE REARRANGEMENT; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INTERPHASE; KARYOTYPING; LEUKEMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION;

EID: 49149127393     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2008.056465     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 Trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood 1998;92:2322-33.
2. Secker-Walker LM, Lawler SD, Hardisty RM. Prognostic implications of chromosomal findings in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia at diagnosis. BMJ 1978;2:1529-30.
3. Chessels JM, Swansbury GJ, Reeves B, et al. Cytogenetics and prognosis in childhood lymphoblastic leukemia: results of MRC UKALL X. Medical Research Council Working Party in Childhood Leukaemia. Br J Haematol 1997;99:93-100.
4. Scholz I, Popp S, Granzow M, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in childhood acute leukemia: correlation with interphase cytogenetics and loss of heterozygosity analysis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001;124:89-97.
5. Weiss MM, Hermsen MA, Meijer GA, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Pathol 1999;52:243-51.
6. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, et al. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA seguence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1994;10:231-43.
7. Shaffer LG, Tommerup N, eds. ISCN 2005. An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Basel: S Karger, 2005.
8. Association of Clinical Cytogenetics. Professional guidelines for clinical cytogenetics. Haemato-Oncology Best Practice Guidelines. Association of Clinical Cytogenetics, 2005.
9. Casas S, Aventn, A, Fuentes F, et al. Genetic diagnosis by genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2004;153:16-25.
10. Jarošová M, Holzerová M, Jedlič ková K, et al. Importance of using comparative genomic hybridization to improve detection of chromosomal changes in childhood acute leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000;123:114-22.
11. Verdorfer I, Brecevic L, Saul W, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization-aided unraveling of complex karyotypes in human haematopoietic neoplasias. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001;124:1-6.
12. Barth TFE, Benner A, Bentz M, et al. Risk of false positive results in comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;28:353-7.
13. Bentz M, Plesch A, Stilgenbauer S, et al. Minimal size of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998;21:172-5.
14. Kirchoff M, Gerdes T, Maahr J, et al. Deletions below 10 megabasepairs are detected in comparative genomic hybridization by standard reference intervals. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;25:410-3.
15. Gebhart E, Verdorfer I, Saul W, et al. Delimiting the use of comparative genomic hybridization in human myeloid neoplastic disorders. Int J Oncol 2000;16:1099-105.
16. Parente F, Gaudray P, Carle GF, et al. Experimental assessment of the detection limit of genomic amplification by comparative genomic hybridization CGH. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997;78:65-8.
17. Coe BP, Ylstra B, Carvalho B, et al. Resolving the resolution of array CGH. Genomics 2007;89:647-53.
18. Aissani B, Sinnett D. Fine physical and transcript mapping of a 1.8 Mb region spanning the locus for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia on chromosome 12p12.3. Gene 1999;240:297-305.
19. Baens M, Wlodarska I, Corveylen A, et al. A physical transcript, and deletion map of chromosome region 12p12.3 flanked by ETV6 and CDKN1B: hypermethylation of the LRP6 CpG island in two leukemia patients with hemizygous del(12p). Genomics 1999;56:40-50.